Tendencias de IA para la educación universitaria: un enfoque bibliométrico
Esprint Investigación,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
4(1), С. 154 - 171
Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2025
En
los
últimos
años,
la
inteligencia
artificial
(IA)
ha
revolucionado
radicalmente
el
ámbito
educativo
al
ofrecer
herramientas
innovadoras
que
transforman
tanto
enseñanza
como
aprendizaje.
No
obstante,
comprensión
sobre
su
impacto
específico
en
educación
universitaria
sigue
siendo
limitada.
Por
ello,
este
estudio
tiene
objetivo
analizar
las
tendencias
emergentes
de
IA
superior
utilizando
un
enfoque
bibliométrico.
lo
tanto,
se
recopiló
información
base
datos
Scopus
mediante
una
estrategia
búsqueda
específica
permitió
obtener
total
4146
documentos
para
análisis.
Se
utilizó
paquete
Bibliometrix
R
y
software
RStudio
procesar
visualizar
datos,
identificó
patrones
producción
científica,
así
principales
actores
influyentes
áreas
investigación
predominantes.
Los
resultados
indican
crecimiento
exponencial
número
publicaciones,
con
particular
aplicación
aprendizaje
personalizado
automatización
procesos
educativos.
Además,
análisis
temporal
palabras
clave
reveló
cambio
significativo
investigativas,
destacando
aumento
exploración
enfoques
basados
machine
learning
Sin
embargo,
persisten
desafíos
adopción
e
implementación
esta
tecnología
entornos
educativos,
relacionados
aspectos
seguridad,
ética
disponibilidad
recursos.
Este
proporciona
visión
integral
panorama
actual
relevante
futuras
investigaciones
campo.
Integration of AI-based applications in education: how students feel about the ChatGPT era?
Tuhin Ahmad Shubha,
Priya G. Vaidya,
P. M. Naushad Ali
и другие.
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 22, 2025
Purpose
This
study
aims
to
investigate
the
awareness,
utilisation,
perception
and
impact
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
tools
among
graduate
students
across
various
universities
in
Northeast
India.
In
addition,
it
delves
into
challenges
they
encounter
while
integrating
AI
their
education
learning.
Design/methodology/approach
used
a
survey
method
how
at
Indian
Universities
perceived
incorporation
assessed
its
on
educational
activities.
Both
qualitative
quantitative
data
were
gathered
for
using
questionnaire.
After
administering
constructed
questionnaire,
175
responses
received
out
calculated
sample
size
384
respondents.
The
was
statistically
analysed
Jeffreys’s
Amazing
Statistics
Programme
(JASP)
(Version
0.16.3.0;
JASP
Team,
2022)
MAXQDA
24
(VERBI
Software,
2024).
Findings
findings
reveal
that
male
are
relatively
more
aware
academic
writing,
with
mean
scores
ranging
from
2.394
3.385,
compared
female
ChatGPT,
QuillBot
Grammarly
most
prominent
accessing
via
smartphones.
analysis
two
open-ended
questions
revealed
mixed
perceptions
towards
use
indicating
usage
is
beneficial
only
shorter
period.
Several
issues
highlighted
like
inadequate
technical
assistance,
skills
constraints,
poor
connectivity
infrastructure.
These
have
been
categorised
positive
negative
opinions
recognising
AI’s
potential.
Originality/value
revolves
around
adoption
India,
unique
region
distinct
geographical
demographic
characteristics.
It
understand
select
settings
–
first
kind
best
authors’
knowledge.
Moreover,
this
sheds
light
potential
difficulties,
perspectives
influencing
landscape
integration
education,
providing
insightful
information
about
dynamics
contexts.
Язык: Английский
University Students’ Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Survey from China
Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
17(8), С. 3541 - 3541
Опубликована: Апрель 15, 2025
The
rapid
development
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(GenAI)
technology
has
triggered
extensive
discussions
about
its
potential
applications
in
sustainable
higher
education.
Based
on
the
acceptance
model
(TAM)
and
task–technology
fit
(TTF)
theory,
this
research
aimed
to
investigate
current
situations
challenges
Chinese
university
students
using
GenAI
four
typical
task
scenarios.
This
was
performed
a
cross-sectional
design.
data
were
collected
via
questionnaire,
with
486
undergraduates
from
participating.
analysis
methods
include
descriptive
statistics,
inferential
content
analysis.
results
show
that
more
than
70%
actively
use
GenAI,
but
nearly
half
them
are
not
very
proficient
use.
Doubao
ERNIE
Bot
tools
they
prefer
most.
primary
functions
text
production
information
retrieval.
They
mainly
learn
relevant
knowledge
skills
through
self-media
knowledge-sharing
platforms.
Among
scenarios,
is
widely
used
course
learning
activities,
while
application
daily
life
job
search
relatively
limited.
demographic
variables
shows
grade
major
have
significant
impact
students’
GenAI.
In
addition,
suggest
universities
should
offer
courses
or
lectures
provide
comprehensive
technical
support
improve
popularity
operability
study
provides
suggestions
for
universities,
education
administration
departments,
departments
services.
It
will
help
optimize
allocation
educational
resources
promote
equity
sustainability.
Язык: Английский
The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI
Intelligence,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
108, С. 101880 - 101880
Опубликована: Дек. 3, 2024
Язык: Английский
Can AI Level the Playing Field? How AI-Assisted Assessment Impacts Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Marketing Instructors
Journal of Marketing Education,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024
Marketing
instructors
increasingly
are
using
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
to
improve
efficiency
in
course
planning
and
assessment.
However,
scholarship
has
yet
show
how
such
use
impacts
student
evaluations,
which
often
skewed
by
gender
bias.
Toward
this
aim,
we
conducted
a
quasi-experiment
college-student
participants
viewed
work
along
with
instructor
feedback
under
four
experimental
conditions.
In
one
condition,
were
told
the
grade
written
and,
another,
that
was
generated
an
AI
tool
trained
instructor.
Instructor
also
manipulated.
Participants
evaluated
assessment
measures
of
agency
competence.
We
found
perceptions
competence
higher
for
male
than
female
who
did
not
tool.
when
used
AI,
marked
reductions
differences
occurred.
These
findings
suggest
complicates
enough
potentially
level
playing
field
instructors.
universally
more
negative
created
regardless
gender.
Therefore,
attempts
as
should
be
made
caution.
Язык: Английский