Internal and external factors influencing Gen Z wellbeing
BMC Public Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
25(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025
Gen
Z,
the
cohort
of
individuals
born
approximately
between
mid-to-late
1990s
and
early
2010s,
has
been
noted
to
experience
challenges
regarding
their
wellbeing.
Yet,
addressing
wellbeing
issues
among
in
productive
years
is
crucial
due
significant
impacts
on
innovation,
productivity,
performance.
Wellbeing
influenced
by
internal
external
factors.
One
important
factor
technology.
Concerns
such
as
excessive
screen
time
constant
need
for
updated
information,
often
referred
Fear
Missing
Out
(FoMO),
have
associated
with
a
decline
Nevertheless,
comprehensive
research
examining
effects
FoMO
remains
limited.
This
study
aims
explore
both
(such
FOMO,
extraversion,
resilience)
factors
social
support
time)
that
contribute
Z
individuals.
The
adopted
quantitative
approach
involving
408
participants,
Smart-PLS
utilized
measurement
model
analysis
structural
analysis.
Findings
from
reveal
how
support,
factor,
positively
influencing
resilience.
also
shows
resilience
plays
role
Therefore,
total
impact
strong,
directly
indirectly.
positive
personal
traits,
specifically
extraversion
However,
this
fails
show
dark
side
technology
impacted
expands
knowledge
direct
relationship
resilience,
well-being,
revealing
significantly
affects
well-being
indirectly
through
Additionally,
it
confirms
factors,
highlights
technology,
especially
(FoMO)
time,
well-being.
Practically,
encourages
parents
educators
fostering
open
communication,
guiding
development,
monitoring
usage
combat
potential
negative
like
FoMO.
Язык: Английский
Scoping Review of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Japanese Healthcare Providers
Опубликована: Июль 26, 2024
A
recent
publication
regarding
a
March
2023
Google
Scholar
search
found
Japan
unique
in
healthcare
providers’
reaction
to
COVID-19
vaccines.
According
one
article,
negative
sentiment
by
providers
toward
vaccines
defines
the
research
this
area,
with
concerns
about
side
effects
outweighing
worries
infection.
This
current
study
investigates
anomaly
through
scoping
review
of
“COVID-19,
Japan,
vaccine
hesitancy”
six
relevant
databases:
Cochrane
Study
Register,
OVID,
ProQuest,
PubMed,
Scopus,
and
Web
Science.
By
following
PRISMA
guidelines,
intent
is
more
thorough
examination
unusual
evalua-tion
Japanese
than
offered
search.
The
finding
that
997
returns,
only
four
were
for
assessment
inclusion.
Of
these
four,
three,
published
Vaccines,
support
hesitancy
their
becoming
so
subsequent
dose
vaccine.
One
article
BMJ
Open
did
not
find
this.
Yet,
design
none
studies
was
specific
investigating
providers,
making
conclusion
questionable.
Suggest-ed
future
directions
include
primacy
those
databases
searched
need
timeliness
examining
anomalies
Язык: Английский