DOMINANSI TIPE-TIPE ARGUMENTASI ANAK-ANAK USIA DINI DALAM PERSPEKTIF STEPHEN TOULMIN: STUDI KASUS DICTO DAN IVO DOI Open Access

Yuliana Setyaningsih

Linguistik Indonesia, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 42(2), С. 425 - 444

Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2024

Kajian terhadap penalaran anak usia dini erat kaitannya dengan perkembangan metakognisi anak. Anak yang kuat mengemukakan argumennya dalam berkomunikasi biasanya mempunyai kemampuan metakognitif tinggi. mengenai hal ini masih sangat jarang ditemukan di Indonesia berdasarkan penelusuran peneliti dari berbagai sumber referensi dapat diakses. Sementara itu, argumen-argumen tersebut mendesak untuk dideskripsikan mengingat keterkaitannya muda sebagai generasi penerus bangsa. Berdasarkan asumsi maka dilakukan penelitian argumentasi dini. Tujuan adalah mendeskripsikan dominasi tipe pada Perspektif teoritis digunakan teori argumen Stephen Toulmin. Penelitian merupakan studi kasus. Studi kasus menempatkan Dicto dan Ivo subjek ini. Kedua kecil berjenis kelamin laki-laki, berusia 4 tahun berlatar belakang etnis Sunda, sedangkan 6 Jawa. Data berupa tuturan argumentatif sejumlah klaim tanggapan situasi dikonstruksikan instrumen penelitiannya. Peneliti menganalisis transkripsi teks video atau audio berisi spontan dikonstruksi oleh disampaikan kepada kedua melalui orang tuanya. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dominan Claim + Ground.

Embodied, dramatizing performances in science class: multimodal spaces and places of knowledge and identity construction DOI
María Varelas, Amanda R. Diaz, Rebecca Kotler

и другие.

Research in Science & Technological Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 42(1), С. 157 - 179

Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2024

We explored the semiotic choices children in grades 1–6 made that nurtured embodied, dramatizing performances science classes at urban public schools, serving predominantly students of color a large US city. studied how such school and home settings (when instruction was remote during COVID-19 pandemic) were implicated children's knowledge identity construction related to available resources positionings. Multimodality social semiotics, practice theory, positioning theory three theoretical anchors guided study, along with sociocultural sociopolitical framings education. The study took place context multi-year collaboration STAGE (Science Theatre for Advancing Generative Engagement) among teachers university educators designing studying pedagogies embodiment as part students' engagement science. ethnographic design larger research allowed us engage over year each class. focus this is on teachers, who collaborated teaching artist, using data from video-recordings, fieldnotes, conversations teachers. findings point generative nature embodiments terms both identities constructing factors shaped generativity. These include (a) available, (b) own particular interests sources excitement, (c) simultaneous use multiple tools offer different affordances meaning making. affirm multimodal embodied create spaces (classrooms gatherings, like auditoria) provide opportunities desettle expected axiological, ontological, epistemological norms often dominate teaching. power performing arts facilitating development connections, solidarity, feelings peoples materials.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

A close look at children’s and adolescents’ arguments: combining a developmental, educational, and philosophical perspective DOI Creative Commons
Chrysi Rapanta, Fabrizio Macagno, Gard B. Jenset

и другие.

European Journal of Psychology of Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 40(1)

Опубликована: Ноя. 15, 2024

Abstract It is broadly admitted that social contexts of reasoning may prompt children and adolescents to improve the quality their reasoning. However, it not clear how this be assessed when comes arguments expressed within oral interactions in diverse settings (whole-class or small-group discussions) by students different ages cultural backgrounds. This study aims offer a methodological contribution issue argument assessment adolescents, looking at large, annotated corpus dialogic discussions during 111 lessons taking place five countries. Our analysis combines structural (Toulmin Argument Pattern) functional (Walton’s argumentation schemes) approach argumentative findings show significant variations across age groups settings. The discussion points out importance sociocultural framing development continuation research methods able grasp important developmental variations.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Argumentation in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Jarmila Bubikova-Moan,

Margareth Sandvik

Human Development, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 66(6), С. 397 - 413

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022

While scientific evidence on argumentation among preschool children is the rise, it dispersed over a number of different fields, which may obfuscate its visibility, merit, and potential. The aim this systematic review was to synthesize existing research and, as such, shed more concerted theoretical empirical light origins well early development human capacity argue. Based 57 included studies, we show that has been approached from numerous perspectives, with dialogic view productive eclecticism between argumentation, developmental, learning, linguistic theories main denominators. also documents young children’s displays range structural-discursive, socio-interactional, developmental features, positioning them argumentative agents in their own right. We discuss implications our findings terms further theory building practical significance.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Teachers’ interventions in science education at primary school. The role of semiotic resources during argumentative interactions in classroom DOI Creative Commons
Josephine Convertini, Francesco Arcidiacono,

Céline Miserez-Caperos

и другие.

Research in Science & Technological Education, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 42(1), С. 94 - 113

Опубликована: Авг. 11, 2023

Background In the field of science education, adults often set up practical-based activities with idea stimulating children's reasoning and approaching in a playful way. Although potential role objects social practices has been considered literature, how teachers work on semiotic aspects argumentation is still less explored.Purpose this paper, purpose to identify practice-based experiences settled by shape education.Sample design methods We analyzed tasks involving total 39 children (6–7 years old) their three teachers, coming from two different classrooms cycle 1 (Harmos, grades 3–4)Footnote1 recruited French speaking-part Switzerland. The were video-recorded then transcribed. Through lenses pragma-dialectical approach, we selected argumentative discussions emerging during performed qualitative analysis these interactions, looking at resources: speech, gaze direction, deictic gestures, position physical objects.Results findings show that play crucial sustaining integration resources activities.Conclusion As classroom evolves through mobilization various communicative tools, present study can contribute strengthen interplay between channels interaction education primary school.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Recreation of Construction Patterns by 4-, 5- and 6-year-old Children 70 Years Ago and Today. Comparison of Test Results DOI Creative Commons
Jan Jelínek

Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 42(2), С. 77 - 91

Опубликована: Авг. 28, 2023

Introduction: Recreation of construction patterns is an important form supporting students’ cognitive development. Unfortunately, a lack research makes it impossible to characterise the skills contemporary children. Research Aim: To establish current ability pre-school children reproduce constructions and determine how these have changed in relation conducted 70 years earlier (Popiel, 1955–1957). Method: In order compare results conducted, tools were recreated method was repeated. Seven finished presented recreating them recorded. The description included correctness reconstructed construction. Results: level reproduction similar. However, modern are better at more difficult constructions. small number subjects limits generalising power study. Conclusions: study shed some light on children’s constructional abilities. They indicate that situation can be used as mental differences studies caution should exercised citing findings living many earlier. needed explore issues depth.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

DOMINANSI TIPE-TIPE ARGUMENTASI ANAK-ANAK USIA DINI DALAM PERSPEKTIF STEPHEN TOULMIN: STUDI KASUS DICTO DAN IVO DOI Open Access

Yuliana Setyaningsih

Linguistik Indonesia, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 42(2), С. 425 - 444

Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2024

Kajian terhadap penalaran anak usia dini erat kaitannya dengan perkembangan metakognisi anak. Anak yang kuat mengemukakan argumennya dalam berkomunikasi biasanya mempunyai kemampuan metakognitif tinggi. mengenai hal ini masih sangat jarang ditemukan di Indonesia berdasarkan penelusuran peneliti dari berbagai sumber referensi dapat diakses. Sementara itu, argumen-argumen tersebut mendesak untuk dideskripsikan mengingat keterkaitannya muda sebagai generasi penerus bangsa. Berdasarkan asumsi maka dilakukan penelitian argumentasi dini. Tujuan adalah mendeskripsikan dominasi tipe pada Perspektif teoritis digunakan teori argumen Stephen Toulmin. Penelitian merupakan studi kasus. Studi kasus menempatkan Dicto dan Ivo subjek ini. Kedua kecil berjenis kelamin laki-laki, berusia 4 tahun berlatar belakang etnis Sunda, sedangkan 6 Jawa. Data berupa tuturan argumentatif sejumlah klaim tanggapan situasi dikonstruksikan instrumen penelitiannya. Peneliti menganalisis transkripsi teks video atau audio berisi spontan dikonstruksi oleh disampaikan kepada kedua melalui orang tuanya. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dominan Claim + Ground.

Процитировано

0