Reacting to Generative AI: Insights from Student and Faculty Discussions on Reddit DOI Open Access
Chuhao Wu, Xinyu Wang, John M. Carroll

и другие.

Опубликована: Янв. 18, 2024

Generative Artificial intelligence (GenAI) such as ChatGPT has elicited strong reactions from almost all stakeholders across the education system. Education-oriented and academic social media communities provide an important venue for these to share experiences exchange ideas about GenAI, which is constructive developing human-centered policies. This study examines early user consisting of 725 Reddit threads between 06/2022 05/2023. Through natural language processing (NLP) content analysis, we observe increasingly negative sentiment in discussion identify six main categories student faculty GenAI education. These reflect concerns integrity AI's impact on value traditional Our analysis also highlights additional workload imposed by new technologies. findings suggest that dialogue community critical can mitigate sources tension students faculty.

Язык: Английский

Exploring the Ethical Implications of Using Generative AI Tools in Higher Education DOI Creative Commons

Elena Đerić,

Domagoj Frank, Dijana Vuković

и другие.

Informatics, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 12(2), С. 36 - 36

Опубликована: Апрель 7, 2025

A significant portion of the academic community, including students, teachers, and researchers, has incorporated generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into their everyday tasks. Alongside increased productivity numerous benefits, specific challenges that are fundamental to maintaining integrity excellence must be addressed. This paper examines whether ethical implications related copyrights authorship, transparency, responsibility, influence usage GenAI in higher education, with emphasis on differences across segments. The findings, based a survey 883 researchers at University North Croatia, reveal awareness roles, gender, experience tools. Teachers demonstrated highest principles, personal potential negative consequences, while students—particularly undergraduates—showed lower levels, likely due limited exposure structured training. Gender were also significant, females consistently demonstrating all dimensions compared males. Longer was associated greater awareness, emphasizing role familiarity fostering understanding. Although strong correlations observed between dimensions, connection future adoption weaker, highlighting need integrate education practical strategies for responsible tool use.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

From GPT-3.5 to GPT-4.o: A Leap in AI’s Medical Exam Performance DOI Creative Commons
Markus Kipp

Information, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 15(9), С. 543 - 543

Опубликована: Сен. 5, 2024

ChatGPT is a large language model trained on increasingly datasets to perform diverse language-based tasks. It capable of answering multiple-choice questions, such as those posed by medical examinations. has been generating considerable attention in both academic and non-academic domains recent months. In this study, we aimed assess GPT’s performance anatomical questions retrieved from licensing examinations Germany. Two different versions were compared. GPT-3.5 demonstrated moderate accuracy, correctly 60–64% the autumn 2022 spring 2021 exams. contrast, GPT-4.o showed significant improvement, achieving 93% accuracy exam 100% exam. When tested 30 unique not available online, maintained 96% rate. Furthermore, consistently outperformed students across six state exams, with statistically mean score 95.54% compared students’ 72.15%. The study demonstrates that outperforms its predecessor, GPT-3.5, cohort students, indicating potential powerful tool education assessment. This improvement highlights rapid evolution LLMs suggests AI could play an important role supporting enhancing training, potentially offering supplementary resources for professionals. However, further research needed limitations practical applications systems real-world practice.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Students’ perceptions about the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in higher education: a cross-sectional survey based in China DOI
Xi Cao, Yu‐Jia Lin, Jiahui Zhang

и другие.

Education and Information Technologies, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 10, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Exploring ChatGPT’s role in English grammar learning: A Kolb model perspective DOI
Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Brandford Bervell

Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 17

Опубликована: Янв. 10, 2025

This study investigated the application of Kolb model to assess efficacy ChatGPT in enhancing English grammar learning. Data were gathered through interviews and observations. By analysing data across model's stages - concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, active experimentation both strengths weaknesses become apparent. The results indicated that while encourages interactive learning enthusiasm among students, there is a prevailing doubt regarding its accuracy, underscoring necessity maintaining critical mindset towards AI-generated content. Participants emphasised ChatGPT's supportive role education, aiding understanding applying concepts. However, concerns occasional inaccuracies struggles understand contextual nuances are observed. highlights importance human involvement AI tools need for students develop technological literacy. Furthermore, it proposes pedagogical effectively utilising education

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

On Continually Tracing Origins of LLM-Generated Text and Its Application in Detecting Cheating in Student Coursework DOI Creative Commons
Quan Wang, Haoran Li

Big Data and Cognitive Computing, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 9(3), С. 50 - 50

Опубликована: Фев. 20, 2025

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in text generation, which also raise numerous concerns about their potential misuse, especially educational exercises and academic writing. Accurately identifying tracing the origins of LLM-generated content is crucial for accountability transparency, ensuring responsible use LLMs environments. Previous methods utilize binary classifiers to discriminate whether a piece was written by human or generated specific LLM employ multi-class trace source from fixed set. These methods, however, are restricted one several pre-specified cannot generalize new LLMs, continually emerging. This study formulates class-incremental learning (CIL) fashion, where emerge, model incrementally learns identify without forgetting old ones. A training-free continual method further devised task, idea extract prototypes emerging using frozen encoder, then perform origin via prototype matching after delicate decorrelation process. For evaluation, two datasets constructed, English Chinese. simulate scenario six emerge over time used generate student essays, an detector has expand its recognition scope as appear. Experimental results show that proposed achieves average accuracy 97.04% on dataset 91.23% Chinese dataset. validate feasibility verify effectiveness detecting cheating coursework.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Unmonitored Online Exams: Valid Assessment or Score Inflation? DOI Creative Commons
Daniel G. Lannin,

Taylor Flinn,

Alexandra Ilie

и другие.

Teaching of Psychology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 11, 2025

Background The validity of unmonitored online exams has raised concerns about academic integrity and grade inflation, especially given the rise artificial intelligence–powered tools. Objective This study evaluates by comparing student performance between two sections an undergraduate personality psychology course: one section completed multiple-choice final exam while other in-person exam. Method A quasi-experimental design was used with course sections. Section 1 (Spring 2022, n = 153) took exam, 2 2023, 160) Both identical throughout semester. Results Online scores were significantly higher than scores. correlation regular strong for but weak Exam format a stronger predictor prior performance. Conclusion Unmonitored lead to inflated may not reflect students’ true abilities. Teaching Implications Educators should reconsider using high-stakes assessments explore alternative methods or enhanced monitoring maintain integrity.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Examining predictors of generative-AI acceptance and usage in academic research: a sequential mixed-methods approach DOI
Sushma Verma, Neerja Kashive, Ashish Gupta

и другие.

Benchmarking An International Journal, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 24, 2025

Purpose This research uses a mixed-methods approach to identify predictors of Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) adoption and usage among academics educational researchers. It examines drivers barriers based on the diffusion innovation theory (DIT) planned behaviour (TPB). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative investigation was carried out by conducting interviews academic researchers who used Gen-AI tools such as ChatGPT. Based DIT, TPB analysis results, an integrated model proposed tested using survey data collected from analysed partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Findings The study demonstrated that relative advantages observability influence attitude subjective norms, these in turn impact behavioural intentions. Researchers' perception advantage their intentions use were found lead positive behaviours. However, technical limitations ethical concerns acted key moderators between intention norms intention, respectively. Mediation effects also observed. Research limitations/implications utilised DIT its base models, future could incorporate additional constructs other technology theories. concentrated had subsequently reported significant factors affecting usage. Future studies should consider perspective non-users tools. Further, geographical focus India, broaden scope. Practical implications community must unite develop guidelines for plagiarism research. be emphasising importance highlights need establishing standards, comprehensive transparently within framework. Originality/value results can greatly enhance understanding researchers, particularly light about integrity potential negative consequences

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence DOI
Boris van Breugel,

Tennison Liu,

Dino Oglić

и другие.

Nature Reviews Bioengineering, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Окт. 8, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Exploring user perceptions: The impact of ChatGPT on high school students' physics understanding and learning DOI Creative Commons
Muhammad Fadillah,

Usmeldi Usmeldi,

Lufri Lufri

и другие.

Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 4(2), С. 1197 - 1207

Опубликована: Дек. 4, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) in education is increasing, including ChatGPT as a learning tool physics subjects. This study aims to analyze high school students' perceptions of using learning, focusing on demographic factors such gender, academic level, and duration use. Involving 167 students, the used survey evaluate views various aspects experience with ChatGPT, effectiveness, clarity, consistency information, tool's ability enrich understanding concepts. Results showed that were positive overall, perceived helping deepen concept understanding, improving correct misconceptions, providing an enjoyable experience. Significant differences found based gender while use no overall significant effect, though longer enhanced specific benefits. These findings highlight potential support by addressing diverse needs outcomes, offering insights for educators integrating AI tools effectively into classrooms.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: Rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education DOI
Edmund Evangelista

Contemporary Educational Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 17(1), С. ep559 - ep559

Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2024

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly OpenAI’s ChatGPT, has significantly impacted higher education institutions (HEIs), offering opportunities and challenges. While these tools enhance personalized learning content generation, they threaten academic integrity, especially in assessment environments. This study systematically examines the impact ChatGPT on integrity HEIs, focusing exam design, strategies, AI detection tools, policy frameworks. research draws from current literature expert recommendations to identify practical approaches for developing assessments that foster critical thinking deep cognitive engagement, making them less susceptible AI-generated content. Key areas explored include creation complex, analytical formats, deploying advanced software counter AI-assisted cheating, formulating institutional policies promote ethical use AI. comprehensive framework aims equip educators administrators with strategies preserve standards while harnessing potential benefits AI, ensuring continued validity AI-driven educational landscape.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3