Carbon Emission Evaluation System for Foundation Construction Based on Entropy–TOPSIS and K-Means Methods DOI Open Access
Yuan Chen,

Gangfeng He,

Yuan Fang

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 17(1), С. 369 - 369

Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2025

Green construction evaluation systems can assist building stakeholders in scientifically evaluating the carbon emission performance of projects. However, most green tools and methods fail to explicitly incorporate indicators, let alone a quantitative evaluation. Therefore, this study proposes system based on entropy–TOPSIS K-means for foundation In study, we innovatively divided process into three phases, namely, transportation emission, excavation earthwork pile work considering their different characteristics reduction difficulties by nature. Different from traditional methods, phases were evaluated separately against baseline value obtained local quota. After that, was weighted method, then rated via method. Based case 19 residential buildings, weights 27.66% (transportation), 42.34% (excavation earthwork), 29.99% (pile work). The cases method four levels: six “Excellent”, five “Good”, “Fair”, “Poor”. proposed expected objectively evaluate rate process, provided theoretical basis decision makers identify hotspots formulate specific measures.

Язык: Английский

Carbon Emission Evaluation System for Foundation Construction Based on Entropy–TOPSIS and K-Means Methods DOI Open Access
Yuan Chen,

Gangfeng He,

Yuan Fang

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 17(1), С. 369 - 369

Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2025

Green construction evaluation systems can assist building stakeholders in scientifically evaluating the carbon emission performance of projects. However, most green tools and methods fail to explicitly incorporate indicators, let alone a quantitative evaluation. Therefore, this study proposes system based on entropy–TOPSIS K-means for foundation In study, we innovatively divided process into three phases, namely, transportation emission, excavation earthwork pile work considering their different characteristics reduction difficulties by nature. Different from traditional methods, phases were evaluated separately against baseline value obtained local quota. After that, was weighted method, then rated via method. Based case 19 residential buildings, weights 27.66% (transportation), 42.34% (excavation earthwork), 29.99% (pile work). The cases method four levels: six “Excellent”, five “Good”, “Fair”, “Poor”. proposed expected objectively evaluate rate process, provided theoretical basis decision makers identify hotspots formulate specific measures.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0