Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials
Mohammed Hammamy,
Silvia Rojas Rueda,
Antonio Pio
и другие.
Materials,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
18(2), С. 265 - 265
Опубликована: Янв. 9, 2025
Two
3D-printed
crown
materials
(Crown
and
Ceramic
Crown)
were
examined
to
determine
the
best
surface
treatment
primers
for
bonding.
Discs
of
two
printed
mounted
with
their
"intaglio"
surfaces
untouched.
Half
specimens
from
each
group
sandblasted
50
µm
alumina.
Then,
divided
into
four
groups
(n
=
10):
Gr1-no
further
treatment;
Gr2-one
coat
silane;
Gr3-one
universal
adhesive;
Gr4-one
silane,
then
one
adhesive.
Bond
strength
prepared
an
Ultradent
shear
bond
apparatus
using
Filtek
Supreme
composite.
Specimens
stored
8
weeks
in
37
°C
water.
The
debonded
a
circular
notched-edge
blade
applied
at
1
mm/min,
was
calculated.
data
compared
two-way
ANOVA
(factors:
primer)
Tukey
post
hoc
analysis
both
independently,
p
<
0.01
considered
meaningful.
filler
content
(burned
ash)
resin
(FTIR)
determined.
For
materials,
factors
primer
significant
(p
0.01),
but
interaction
not
0.43
Crown
0.34
Crown).
Alumina
air
particle
abrasion
improved
materials.
grouped
treatments
same
statistically
different
materials:
Gr1
Gr2
Gr3
Gr4.
percentage
32.7%
48.2%.
Resin
similar
most
effective
method
crowns
(regardless
percentage)
sandblast
alumina
apply
layer
adhesive
(with
or
without
previous
application
silane).
Язык: Английский
Optical properties of repaired additively manufactured resin composites and zirconia and subtractively manufactured ceramics: a comparative study of composite resins
BMC Oral Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
25(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 27, 2025
Язык: Английский
3D-printed resin for permanent/definitive restorations: meta-analysis for bond strength
PeerJ Materials Science,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
7, С. e35 - e35
Опубликована: Май 20, 2025
Background
Three-dimensional
(3D)
printing
technologies
have
gained
increasing
popularity
in
restorative
dentistry
for
fabricating
polymer-based
restorations.
However,
limited
evidence
exists
regarding
the
bond
strength
between
3D-printed
materials
and
resin
cements,
particularly
considering
effects
of
surface
treatments
aging
conditions.
This
meta-analysis
aimed
to
synthesize
current
knowledge
on
adhesion
restorations
cements
identify
areas
future
research.
Methodology
A
literature
search
was
conducted
PubMed,
Google
Scholar,
Web
Science
databases
using
following
keywords:
“3D
-
printing”,
“additive
manufacturing”,
“bond
strength”,
“resin
cement”,
“surface
treatment”,
“aging”.
Inclusion
criteria
were
studies
evaluating
polymer
published
English,
with
full-text
availability.
Data
values,
failure
modes,
treatments,
protocols,
material
characterization
extracted
analyzed.
Results
Nine
included
review.
Digital
light
processing
(DLP)
stereolithography
(SLA)
predominant
3D
technologies.
Airborne-particle
abrasion
(APA)
50
µm
aluminum
oxide
particles
used
five
significantly
improved
strengths
compared
untreated
controls.
Chemical
such
as
silane
coupling
agents
universal
adhesives
containing
10-MDP
some
further
enhanced
when
combined
APA.
Thermocycling
5,000
cycles,
simulating
6
months
clinical
service,
most
common
protocol.
Bond
generally
decreased
after
aging,
treatment
combinations
showing
greater
stability
than
others.
Conclusions
APA
is
an
effective
method
improving
cement.
The
combination
mechanical
chemical
provides
additional
benefits.
Material
composition,
use
UDMA-based
resins,
influences
aging.
Standardized
protocols
3D-printing,
post-processing,
testing
methods
are
essential
consistent
results.
Further
investigations
needed
establish
long-term
performance
guidelines
optimize
bonding
these
innovative
materials.
Язык: Английский
Effectiveness of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Prosthesis,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
7(3), С. 56 - 56
Опубликована: Май 23, 2025
Objectives:
The
widespread
adoption
of
three-dimensional
(3D)-printed
resins
in
restorative
dentistry
has
introduced
significant
challenges
establishing
strong
and
lasting
bonds
with
resin-based
cements.
Despite
the
development
numerous
surface
treatment
techniques
designed
to
improve
adhesion,
a
clear
consensus
on
most
effective
approach
remains
elusive.
This
systematic
review
meta-analysis
critically
examined
impact
various
protocols
bond
strength
3D-printed
resins.
By
comparing
treated
versus
untreated
surfaces,
study
aimed
determine
reliable
strategies
for
enhancing
ultimately
offering
evidence-based
guidance
inform
clinical
decision-making.
Methods:
identified
relevant
studies
through
comprehensive
search
MEDLINE
via
PubMed,
Web
Science,
Scielo,
Scopus,
EMBASE
databases,
supplemented
by
manual
reference
checks,
identify
vitro
published
up
February
2025.
Studies
assessing
bonding
following
treatments
were
included.
Data
outcomes,
such
as
shear
strength,
microtensile
microshear
extracted.
extraction
included
details,
type
resin
printing
technology,
protocols,
testing
methods,
storage
conditions,
results.
quality
was
assessed
using
ROBDEMat
tool.
Meta-analyses
performed
Review
Manager
Software
(version
5.4,
Cochrane
Collaboration,
Copenhagen,
Denmark),
statistical
significance
set
at
p
<
0.05.
Statistical
heterogeneity
among
evaluated
Cochran
Q
test
I2
inconsistency
test.
Results:
Nine
met
criteria
qualitative
analysis,
eight
meta-analysis.
findings
revealed
that
significantly
enhanced
immediate
(p
=
0.01),
only
sandblasting
silane
demonstrating
statistically
effect
0.007).
Similarly,
after
aging,
continued
hydrofluoric
acid
being
methods
produce
increase
values
0.001).
Conclusions:
underscores
importance
combining
mechanical
chemical
treatments,
especially
application,
achieve
durable
Язык: Английский