Open Research Europe,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
4, С. 245 - 245
Опубликована: Ноя. 7, 2024
The
interplay
between
work
and
non-work
in
academic
settings
has
been
the
subject
of
extensive
research,
particularly
relation
to
work-life
balance
work-nonwork
conflict.
However,
much
this
literature
tended
overlook
specific
dynamics
boundaries.
Moreover,
while
prior
research
explored
general
patterns
conflict
balance,
it
not
sufficiently
addressed
unique
pressures
that
academics
face,
such
as
high
autonomy,
irregular
working
hours,
competing
demands.
This
review
critically
examines
how
nature
shapes
boundaries
non-work,
advancing
conversation
beyond
traditional
approaches.
The
central
question
guiding
is:
How
do
aspects
shape
blurring
boundaries?
Through
a
problematizing
approach,
relies
on
41
articles
broaden
enhance
our
understanding
boundary
challenges
encounter.
Findings
reveal
blurred
academia
are
driven
by
demand
overload,
work-family
conflicts,
lack
organizational
support,
compounded
digitalisation
neoliberal
practices.
Heightened
managerialism,
careerism,
precarity
exacerbate
these
boundaries,
affecting
academics'
well-being
identity
work.
By
addressing
gaps,
offers
nuanced
construct,
navigate,
negotiate
within
complex
environment
shaped
pressures.
limitations
conventional
approaches
interface
advocating
for
more
context-sensitive,
perspective.
Journal of Management Studies,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Ноя. 17, 2024
Abstract
It
is
clear
that
contemporary
management
education
(ME)
needs
to
be
transformed
tackle
complex
social‐ecological
crises
effectively.
However,
the
concept
of
transformation
often
ill‐defined
in
context
ME;
while
there
also
a
lack
understanding
about
what
concrete
trajectories
(also
called
scaling
pathways)
are
available
educators.
This
conceptual
paper
adopts
systems
lens
shed
light
on
basics
(the
why,
what,
where,
when
and
who);
combined
with
social
innovation
provide
more
clarity
transformation's
practical
specificity
how).
Rooted
vision
ME
aimed
at
cultivating
flourishing
(i.e.
civic
ME),
this
integrates
different
theoretical
lenses
assert
possibility
of–and
outline
for–transformation
business
school.
work
contributes
developing
approach
proposing
multiple
pathways
support
ME.
highlights
stands
crossroads:
educators
could
passively
wait
until
forced
by
unintended
crossing
tipping
points;
or
deliberately
collectively
navigate
it.
Ultimately,
emerges
from
delicate
interplay
structure
inescapable
structural
barriers)
agency
intentional
transformative
actions).
Business History,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
66(4), С. 802 - 806
Опубликована: Март 5, 2024
This
is
a
short
essay
in
response
to
the
editorial
by
Lubinski,
Decker,
and
MacKenzie
(this
issue),
which
authors
emphasise
need
for
scientific
peer-review,
but
also
scrutinise
it
its
potential
necessity
be
'revised
resubmitted'.
Finding
much
agreement
with
their
engaging
insightful
editorial,
I
elaborate
little
on
some
of
arguments
(especially
'snarky
reviewers'),
add
piece
highlighting
that
there
are
many
external
parties
–
from
accreditation
bodies
publishers
OpenAI
et
al.
prompt
evolution
peer-review
ways
increasingly
slips
out
academic
control.
Therefore,
when
question
asked
'whether
peer
review
ripe
revise
resubmit?',
my
concern
academics
become
less
party
answering
question.
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
3(3), С. 986 - 991
Опубликована: Авг. 31, 2024
The
development
of
science
and
technology
in
this
era
is
proliferating.
effect
implementing
these
regulations
resulted
the
teaching
learning
process
that
should
have
been
carried
out
face-to-face
becoming
network-based
learning.
research
method
used
experimental
research,
which
a
to
see
whether
there
change
occurs
after
giving
treatment
subjects
who
are
source
data
for
researchers.
use
e-learning
media
expected
overcome
barriers.
aims
improve
students'
knowledge
outcomes.
So,
when
conducting
it
was
found
with
had
not
able
provide
satisfactory
results
on
student
outcomes,
where
outcomes
did
reach
target
KKM
value
75.
Many
factors
influenced
this,
including
all
students
having
smartphones
low
network
signal
quality.
Open Research Europe,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
4, С. 245 - 245
Опубликована: Ноя. 7, 2024
The
interplay
between
work
and
non-work
in
academic
settings
has
been
the
subject
of
extensive
research,
particularly
relation
to
work-life
balance
work-nonwork
conflict.
However,
much
this
literature
tended
overlook
specific
dynamics
boundaries.
Moreover,
while
prior
research
explored
general
patterns
conflict
balance,
it
not
sufficiently
addressed
unique
pressures
that
academics
face,
such
as
high
autonomy,
irregular
working
hours,
competing
demands.
This
review
critically
examines
how
nature
shapes
boundaries
non-work,
advancing
conversation
beyond
traditional
approaches.
The
central
question
guiding
is:
How
do
aspects
shape
blurring
boundaries?
Through
a
problematizing
approach,
relies
on
41
articles
broaden
enhance
our
understanding
boundary
challenges
encounter.
Findings
reveal
blurred
academia
are
driven
by
demand
overload,
work-family
conflicts,
lack
organizational
support,
compounded
digitalisation
neoliberal
practices.
Heightened
managerialism,
careerism,
precarity
exacerbate
these
boundaries,
affecting
academics'
well-being
identity
work.
By
addressing
gaps,
offers
nuanced
construct,
navigate,
negotiate
within
complex
environment
shaped
pressures.
limitations
conventional
approaches
interface
advocating
for
more
context-sensitive,
perspective.
