Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(10), С. 3570 - 3570
Опубликована: Май 20, 2023
Low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
is
a
well-established
biomarker
in
the
management
of
dyslipidemia.
Therefore,
we
aimed
to
evaluate
concordance
LDL-C-estimating
equations
with
direct
enzymatic
measurement
diabetic
and
prediabetic
populations.
The
data
31,031
subjects
included
study
were
divided
into
prediabetic,
diabetic,
control
groups
according
HbA1c
values.
LDL-C
was
measured
by
homogenous
assay
calculated
Martin-Hopkins,
Martin-Hopkins
extended,
Friedewald,
Sampson
equations.
statistics
between
measurements
estimations
obtained
evaluated.
All
evaluated
had
lower
compared
non-diabetic
group.
Even
so,
extended
approach
demonstrated
highest
statistic
patients.
Further,
found
have
correlation
other
Over
190
mg/dL
concentrations,
equation
again
extended.
In
most
scenarios,
performed
best
groups.
Additionally,
methods
can
be
used
at
low
values
non-HDL-C/TG
ratio
(<2.4),
as
performance
estimation
decreases
decreases.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
15(9), С. e0239934 - e0239934
Опубликована: Сен. 30, 2020
Background
Low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
is
a
target
for
cardiovascular
prevention.
Contemporary
equations
LDL-C
estimation
have
limited
accuracy
in
certain
scenarios
(high
triglycerides
[TG],
very
low
LDL-C).
Objectives
We
derived
novel
method
from
the
standard
lipid
profile
using
machine
learning
(ML)
approach
utilizing
random
forests
(the
Weill
Cornell
model).
compared
its
correlation
to
direct
with
Friedewald
and
Martin-Hopkins
estimation.
Methods
The
study
cohort
comprised
convenience
sample
of
measurements
(with
directly
measured
components
total
[TC],
high-density
[HDL-C],
TG)
as
well
chemical-based
performed
on
same
day
at
New
York-Presbyterian
Hospital/Weill
Medicine
(NYP-WCM).
Subsequently,
an
ML
algorithm
was
used
construct
model
Results
are
reported
held-out
test
set,
coefficients
absolute
residuals
assess
performance.
Between
2005
2019,
there
were
17,500
profiles
10,936
unique
individuals
(4,456
females;
40.8%)
aged
1
103.
Correlation
between
estimated
values
0.982
model,
0.950
0.962
method.
consistently
better
across
subgroups
stratified
by
TG
values,
including
>500
<70.
Conclusions
An
found
than
either
formula
or
equation,
setting
elevated
LDL-C.
International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
12(6), С. 2613 - 2620
Опубликована: Май 31, 2025
Background:
Globally,
non-communicable
diseases
(NCDs)
are
a
leading
cause
of
morbidity
and
mortality.
Occupational
lifestyle,
particularly
in
professions
like
truck
driving,
increases
exposure
to
NCD
risk
factors.
Early
detection
at
the
community
level
is
vital
for
prevention
ensuring
well-being.
M/S
Primary
Healthtech
Private
Limited,
collaboration
with
Indian
Institute
Technology
Guwahati,
developed
“Mobilab”
portable,
battery-operated,
IoT-enabled
biochemistry
analyzer.
To
support
early
screening,
health
camps
targeting
drivers
key
contributors
national
supply
chain
were
conducted.
Methods:
Two
organized
Binola
(Camp-1)
Greater
Noida
(Camp-2),
screening
382
234
participants
respectively
over
8
days
each.
Screening
used
Mobilab
device
assess
various
biochemical
physiological
parameters
NCDs.
Results:
Parameters
tested
included
cholesterol
(CHOL),
triglyceride
(TGL),
LDL,
HDL,
uric
acid
(UA),
creatinine
(CRE),
glucose
(GLU),
hemoglobin
(HB),
total
bilirubin
(TBIL),
protein
(TP),
albumin
(ALB),
globulin
(GLO),
albumin/globulin
ratio
(A/G).
Camp-2
showed
higher
prevalence
kidney
issues
(41.1%)
anemia
(39%)
compared
Camp-1
(26.18%
18%,
respectively).
Diabetes
was
low
both
camps:
2.88%
2.16%
Camp-2.
Conclusions:
This
community-based
among
highlights
effectiveness
using
portable
diagnostic
tools.
The
study
underscores
importance
regular
check-ups,
especially
kidney-related
complications,
need
sustained
preventive
healthcare
initiatives
high-risk
occupational
groups.
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
27(12), С. 1359 - 1373
Опубликована: Июль 1, 2020
The
importance
of
precisely
quantifying
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
has
become
more
pronounced
over
the
years,
with
rise
metabolic
syndrome
in
population
and
reduction
LDL-C
treatment
goals.
This
study
aims
to
compare
two
novel
equations
indirectly
estimating
assess
their
compatibility
Friedewald
formula,
a
high
cardiovascular
risk.This
is
retrospective
analysis
lipid
profiles
10,006
patients
who
underwent
coronary
angiography.
was
calculated
using
Friedewald,
Martin,
Sampson
equations,
between
estimations
compared
methods
concordance
reclassification.Our
findings
show
that
Martin
displayed
rates
upward
reclassification
(10.8%
7.5%,
respectively)
when
equation.
In
comparison
method,
also
reclassified
3.8
%
higher
category.
magnitude
discordance
estimates
hypertriglyceridemic
patients,
this
increased
progressively
LDL-C.
proportion
<70
mg/dL
category
reached
44%
(Sampson
vs.
Friedewald),
65%
(Martin
37%
vs.Sampson)
those
triglyceride
levels
200
399
mg/dL.Both
significant
categories
particularly
elevated
triglycerides
low
LDL-C,
whom
accurate
estimation
required.
Further
studies
are
warranted
validate
recently
developed
equation
method
tended
significantly
overestimate
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
9(2), С. 148 - 155
Опубликована: Окт. 25, 2022
Low-density
lipoprotein
(LDL-C)
lowering
is
imperative
in
cardiovascular
disease
prevention.
We
aimed
to
compare
accuracy
of
three
clinically-implemented
LDL-C
equations
a
clinical
trial
cholesterol
ester
transfer
protein
(CETP)
inhibition.Men
and
women
aged
18-75
years
with
dyslipidaemia
were
recruited
from
17
sites
the
Netherlands
Denmark.
Patients
randomly
assigned
one
nine
groups
using
various
combinations
CETP
inhibitor
TA-8995
(obicetrapib),
statin
therapy,
placebo.
In
pooled
measurements
over
12
weeks,
we
calculated
by
Friedewald,
Martin/Hopkins,
Sampson
equations,
compared
values
preparative
ultracentrifugation
(PUC)
overall
special
interest
low
LDL-C/high
triglycerides
subgroup.
There
242
patients
contributing
921
observations.
Overall
median
differences
between
estimates
PUC
small:
0.00
(25th,
75th:
-0.10,
0.08)
mmol/L
[0
(-4,
3)
mg/dL];
0.02
(-0.08,
0.10)
[1
(-3,
4)
Sampson,
0.05
(-0.03,
0.15)
[2
(-1,
6)
mg/dL].
subgroup
estimated
<1.8
(<70
mg/dL)
1.7-4.5
(150-399
mg/dL),
Friedewald
equation
underestimated
difference
versus
-0.25
(-0.33,
-0.10)
[-10
(-13,
-4)
mg/dL],
whereas
Martin/Hopkins
was
mg/dL]
-0.06
(-0.13,
0.00)
[-2
(-5,
0)
this
subgroup,
proportion
observations
that
correctly
classified
71.4%
vs.
100.0%
93.1%
Sampson.In
European
receiving
inhibitor,
found
improved
contemporary
equation,
greatest
observed
equation.ClinicalTrials.gov,
NCT01970215.
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
25(7), С. 643 - 652
Опубликована: Май 22, 2018
The
Friedewald
equation
is
the
standard
method
for
estimating
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
levels
[LDL-C(F)]
and
fixes
ratio
of
triglyceride
(TG)
to
very
LDL-C
at
5.
However,
this
has
been
reported
underestimate
LDL-C,
particularly
in
patients
with
<70
mg/dL.
A
novel
estimation
[LDL-C(M)]
using
an
adjustable
factor
instead
a
fixed
value
5
recently
proposed.
purpose
study
was
validate
LDL-C(M)
Japanese
cardiovascular
disease
(CVD)
treated
statins.In
385
consecutive
CVD
statins,
LDL-C(F)
were
compared
directly
measured
[LDL-C(D)].Mean
LDL-C(D),
LDL-C(F),
81.7±25.5,
76.4±24.6,
79.9±24.5
mg/dL,
respectively.
In
all
patients,
both
significantly
correlated
LDL-C(D)
[LDL-C(F)
vs.
LDL-C(D):
R=0.974,
p<0.001;
R=0.987,
p<0.001].
showed
better
correlation
LDLC(D)
[LDL-C(M)
R=0.935,
LDLC(D):
R=0.868,
contrast,
or
similar
≥70
mg/dL.In
level
estimated
by
might
be
more
accurate
than
those
Medical Principles and Practice,
Год журнала:
2017,
Номер
27(1), С. 8 - 14
Опубликована: Дек. 4, 2017
This
study
was
conducted
to
validate
the
Martin
method
in
coronary
atherosclerosis
comparison
with
Friedewald
equation.A
total
of
299
participants
a
artery
calcium
score
(CACS)
≥300
and
serum
triglyceride
(TG)
level
<400
mg/dL
at
Seoul
National
University
Hospital
Healthcare
System
Gangnam
Center,
Seoul,
Korea,
were
enrolled
this
study.
Low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
directly
measured
homogeneous
assay
(DLDL)
estimated
by
both
equation
(FLDL)
(MLDL).
Overall
concordances
between
DLDL
LDL-C
estimates
calculated
as
percent
agreement.
The
McNemar
test
used
compare
rate
reclassification
FLDL
MLDL,
determine
which
differed
significantly
from
each
other.Overall
concordance
MLDL
slightly
higher
than
that
(73.2
vs.
70.9%,
p
<
0.001).
showed
poor
performance
when
TG
≥200
mg/dL,
mostly
underestimation,
represented
64.7%
discordance
DLDL.
however,
did
not
exceed
35.3%
all
groups.The
estimate
using
strata-specific
TG:VLDL
ratio
2-fold
better
direct
compared
mg/dL.
finding
suggests
could
be
alternative
for
estimating
is
atherosclerosis.
Current Opinion in Lipidology,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
30(4), С. 273 - 283
Опубликована: Май 25, 2019
β-Quantification
is
considered
the
reference
measurement
procedure
for
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C).
However,
this
technique
time-consuming
and
thus
inappropriate
routine
clinical
practice.
Therefore,
Friedewald
equation
or
homogeneous
assays
have
been
widely
utilized.
As
several
pitfalls
exist
with
these
two
methods,
a
novel
method
estimating
LDL-C
was
developed
by
Martin
et
al.
RECENT
FINDINGS:
Martin's
uses
strata-specific
median
triglycerides/very
(VLDL-C)
ratio
on
basis
of
triglycerides
non-HDL-C
concentrations.
Recent
studies
show
that
better
correlates
β-quantification
compared
equation,
especially
values
at
least
150
mg/dl
and/or
LDL-CD
less
than
70
mg/dl.
Such
findings
also
demonstrated
in
other
ethnic
groups
(Japanese
Korean)
disease
populations,
including
diabetes
cardiovascular
disease,
which
triglycerides/VLDL-C
can
be
affected.For
current
therapeutic
goal
below
high-risk
patients,
accurate
assessment
levels
very
low
required.
could
overcome
such
as
underestimation
level.
Further
evaluation
participants
diverse
backgrounds
conditions
would
expand
implementation
method.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
59(5), С. 857 - 867
Опубликована: Дек. 24, 2020
Abstract
Objectives
Low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
is
the
main
laboratory
parameter
used
for
management
of
cardiovascular
disease.
The
aim
this
study
was
to
compare
measured
LDL-C
with
as
calculated
by
Friedewald,
Martin/Hopkins,
Vujovic,
and
Sampson
formulas
regard
triglyceride
(TG),
non-high-density
(non-HDL-C)/TG
ratio.
Methods
1,209
results
were
compared
using
ultracentrifugation-precipitation
(first
study)
direct
(second
methods.
Passing-Bablok
regression
applied
percentage
difference
between
(total
error)
number
exceeding
total
error
goal
12%
established.
Results
There
good
correlation
measurement
calculation
methods
(r
0.962–0.985).
median
ranged
from
−2.7%/+1.4%
(first/second
Vujovic
formula
−6.7%/−4.3%
Friedewald
formula.
numbers
underestimated
67
(Vujovic),
134
(Martin/Hopkins),
157
(Samspon),
239
(Friedewald).
Less
than
7%
those
obtained
samples
TG
>4.5
mmol/L.
From
57%
(Martin/Hopkins)
81%
(Vujovic)
a
non-HDL-C/TG
ratio
<2.4.
Conclusions
appear
be
more
accurate
To
minimize
significantly
results,
we
propose
implementation
risk
categories
according
suggest
that
<1.2,
level
should
not
but
independently
level.