Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations DOI Creative Commons
Carlo Galli,

Anna Viktorovna Gavrilova,

Elena Calciolari

и другие.

Information, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 16(5), С. 378 - 378

Опубликована: Май 1, 2025

Systematic reviews require labor-intensive screening processes—an approach prone to bottlenecks, delays, and scalability constraints in large-scale reviews. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a powerful alternative, capable of operating zero-shot or few-shot modes classify abstracts according predefined criteria without requiring continuous human intervention like semi-automated platforms. This review focuses on the central challenges that users biomedical field encounter when integrating LLMs—such GPT-4—into evidence-based research. It examines critical requirements for software data preprocessing, discusses various prompt strategies, underscores continued need oversight maintain rigorous quality control. By drawing current practices cost management, reproducibility, refinement, this article highlights how teams can substantially reduce workloads compromising comprehensiveness inquiry. The findings presented aim balance strengths LLM-driven automation with structured checks, ensuring systematic retain their methodological integrity while leveraging efficiency gains made possible by recent advances artificial intelligence.

Язык: Английский

Large Language Models for Screening Search Results in Systematic Reviews: Are We There Yet? DOI
S. Swaroop Vedula, Daniel Khashabi

Annals of Internal Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 24, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations DOI Creative Commons
Carlo Galli,

Anna Viktorovna Gavrilova,

Elena Calciolari

и другие.

Information, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 16(5), С. 378 - 378

Опубликована: Май 1, 2025

Systematic reviews require labor-intensive screening processes—an approach prone to bottlenecks, delays, and scalability constraints in large-scale reviews. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a powerful alternative, capable of operating zero-shot or few-shot modes classify abstracts according predefined criteria without requiring continuous human intervention like semi-automated platforms. This review focuses on the central challenges that users biomedical field encounter when integrating LLMs—such GPT-4—into evidence-based research. It examines critical requirements for software data preprocessing, discusses various prompt strategies, underscores continued need oversight maintain rigorous quality control. By drawing current practices cost management, reproducibility, refinement, this article highlights how teams can substantially reduce workloads compromising comprehensiveness inquiry. The findings presented aim balance strengths LLM-driven automation with structured checks, ensuring systematic retain their methodological integrity while leveraging efficiency gains made possible by recent advances artificial intelligence.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0