Human Brain Mapping,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
46(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
present
study
investigated
the
neuromodulatory
substrates
of
salience
processing
and
its
impact
on
memory
encoding
behaviour,
with
a
specific
focus
two
distinct
types
salience:
reward
contextual
unexpectedness.
46
Participants
performed
novel
task
paradigm
modulating
these
aspects
independently
allowing
for
investigating
their
interactive
effects
while
undergoing
high‐resolution
fMRI.
By
using
advanced
image
techniques
tailored
to
examine
midbrain
brainstem
nuclei
high
precision,
our
additionally
aimed
elucidate
differential
activation
patterns
in
subcortical
response
reward‐associated
contextually
unexpected
stimuli,
including
pathways
involving
particular
dopaminergic
modulation.
We
observed
involvement
ventral
striatum,
substantia
nigra
(SN)
caudate
nucleus,
as
well
functional
specialisation
within
subregions
cingulate
cortex
types.
Moreover,
SN
could
be
identified.
Dorsal
areas
preferentially
processed
related
stimulus
(of
both
unexpectedness),
were
involved
salience‐related
(for
unexpectedness
only).
These
specialisations
are
line
different
projection
dorsal
brain
supporting
attention
memory,
respectively.
disentangling
types,
we
hope
further
consolidate
understanding
structures'
roles
behavioural
responses
salient
events.
Nature Communications,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Дек. 21, 2023
Abstract
The
signed
value
and
unsigned
salience
of
reward
prediction
errors
(RPEs)
are
critical
to
understanding
reinforcement
learning
(RL)
cognitive
control.
Dorsomedial
prefrontal
cortex
(dMPFC)
insula
(INS)
key
regions
for
integrating
surprise
information,
but
conflicting
evidence
both
activity
has
led
multiple
proposals
the
nature
RPE
representations
in
these
brain
areas.
Recently
developed
RL
models
allow
neurons
respond
differently
positive
negative
RPEs.
Here,
we
use
intracranially
recorded
high
frequency
(HFA)
test
whether
this
flexible
asymmetric
coding
strategy
captures
diversity
human
INS
dMPFC.
At
region
level,
found
a
bias
towards
RPEs
areas
which
paralleled
behavioral
adaptation.
local
spatially
interleaved
neural
populations
responding
valence-specific
Furthermore,
directional
connectivity
estimates
revealed
leading
role
communicating
These
findings
support
across
distinct
intermingled
as
core
principle
processing
inform
theories
dMPFC
Event
boundaries
help
structure
the
content
of
episodic
memories
by
segmenting
continuous
experiences
into
discrete
events.
may
also
serve
to
preserve
meaningful
information
within
an
event,
thereby
actively
separating
important
from
interfering
representations
imposed
past
and
future
Here,
we
tested
hypothesis
that
event
organize
emotional
memory
based
on
changing
dynamics
as
events
unfold.
We
developed
a
novel
threat-reversal
learning
task
whereby
participants
encoded
trial-unique
exemplars
two
semantic
categories
across
three
phases:
preconditioning,
fear-acquisition,
reversal.
Shock
contingencies
were
established
for
one
category
during
acquisition
(CS+)
then
switched
other
reversal
(CS-).
Importantly,
was
either
separated
perceptible
boundary
(experiment
1)
or
occurred
immediately
after
acquisition,
with
no
context
shift
2).
In
surprise
recognition
test
next
day,
performance
tracked
contingences
encoding
in
experiment
1,
such
selectively
recognized
more
threat-associated
CS+
before
(retroactive)
but
this
pattern
reversed
toward
CS-
By
contrast,
encoding—without
between
conditioning
reversal—exhibited
undifferentiated
both
following
Further
analyses
highlight
nuanced
effects
reversing
conditioned
fear,
updating
mnemonic
generalization,
biasing
temporal
source
memory.
These
findings
suggest
provide
anchor
points
distinctly
information,
adaptively
structuring
our
experiences.
Contemporary
theories
guiding
the
search
for
neural
mechanisms
of
learning
and
memory
assume
that
associative
results
from
temporal
pairing
cues
reinforcers
resulting
in
coincident
activation
associated
neurons,
strengthening
their
synaptic
connection.
While
enduring,
this
framework
has
limitations:
Temporal
pairing-based
models
do
not
fit
with
many
experimental
observations
cannot
be
used
to
make
quantitative
predictions
about
behavior.
Here,
we
present
behavioral
data
support
an
alternative,
information-theoretic
conception:
The
amount
information
provide
timing
reward
delivery
predicts
Furthermore,
approach
accounts
rate
depth
both
inhibitory
excitatory
across
paradigms
species.
We
also
show
dopamine
release
ventral
striatum
reflects
cue-predicted
changes
reinforcement
rates
consistent
subjects
understanding
relationships
between
task
events.
Our
reshape
conceptual
biological
learning.
Human Brain Mapping,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
46(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
present
study
investigated
the
neuromodulatory
substrates
of
salience
processing
and
its
impact
on
memory
encoding
behaviour,
with
a
specific
focus
two
distinct
types
salience:
reward
contextual
unexpectedness.
46
Participants
performed
novel
task
paradigm
modulating
these
aspects
independently
allowing
for
investigating
their
interactive
effects
while
undergoing
high‐resolution
fMRI.
By
using
advanced
image
techniques
tailored
to
examine
midbrain
brainstem
nuclei
high
precision,
our
additionally
aimed
elucidate
differential
activation
patterns
in
subcortical
response
reward‐associated
contextually
unexpected
stimuli,
including
pathways
involving
particular
dopaminergic
modulation.
We
observed
involvement
ventral
striatum,
substantia
nigra
(SN)
caudate
nucleus,
as
well
functional
specialisation
within
subregions
cingulate
cortex
types.
Moreover,
SN
could
be
identified.
Dorsal
areas
preferentially
processed
related
stimulus
(of
both
unexpectedness),
were
involved
salience‐related
(for
unexpectedness
only).
These
specialisations
are
line
different
projection
dorsal
brain
supporting
attention
memory,
respectively.
disentangling
types,
we
hope
further
consolidate
understanding
structures'
roles
behavioural
responses
salient
events.