Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Nature Water, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Nature, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 639(8056), С. 861 - 863
Опубликована: Март 24, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Energy Research & Social Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 125, С. 104117 - 104117
Опубликована: Май 9, 2025
Процитировано
0
Oxford Open Climate Change, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 4(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Abstract Emissions reduction and removal are not proceeding at a pace that will limit global average warming to less than the Paris Agreement targets of 1.5°C or 2.0°C. Accelerating is indicated by record high 2023–2024 monthly temperatures annual 2023 mean surface around above pre-industrial levels. Only direct climate cooling has potential avert continued temperature rise in near term moderate least some projected change disruption including extreme weather, sea level rise, loss ice, glacier permafrost melting, coral reef die-off. Strategically deployed scale, starting term, several measures have reduce reverse warming. Others can exert local regional influences. The world needs an approach extends beyond sole reliance on emission reductions removal. We propose (i) researching, field testing deploying one more large-scale influence(s) perhaps initially polar regions applying also support adaptation, (ii) accelerating emissions with early prioritization short-lived drivers, (iii) large scale carbon draw down legacy greenhouse gas. authors make no attempt determine what mix optimal. That depend modeling experimentation. properly researched emergency “tourniquets,” near-term our “bleeding” Earth we slow then ongoing increasingly severe 21st Century.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2
Cooperation and Conflict, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 18, 2024
The Arctic has been identified by scientists as a relatively promising venue for controversial ‘solar geoengineering’ – technical schemes to reflect more sunlight counteract global warming. Yet contemporary regional security dynamics and the relative (in)significance of climate concerns among key states suggest different conclusion. By systematically juxtaposing recently published geoengineering with strategies littoral China, we reveal detail two conflicting imaginaries. Geoengineering scientifically securitise (and seek maintain) Arctic’s ‘great white shield’ protect ‘global’ humanity against tipping points invoke past era ‘exceptionality’ greater political feasibility research interventions here. Meanwhile, state imaginaries understand an increasingly contested region considerable geopolitical peril economic opportunity temperatures rise. Alongside entangled history science geopolitics in region, this suggests that are unlikely follow scientific visions, unless co-opted into competitive, extractivist imaginaries, may prove entirely infeasible. Moreover, if is ‘best-case’ politics, places huge question mark over other, prospects.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2
Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0