Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Nature Water, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 17, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Nature, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 639(8056), P. 861 - 863
Published: March 24, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Oxford Open Climate Change, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract Emissions reduction and removal are not proceeding at a pace that will limit global average warming to less than the Paris Agreement targets of 1.5°C or 2.0°C. Accelerating is indicated by record high 2023–2024 monthly temperatures annual 2023 mean surface around above pre-industrial levels. Only direct climate cooling has potential avert continued temperature rise in near term moderate least some projected change disruption including extreme weather, sea level rise, loss ice, glacier permafrost melting, coral reef die-off. Strategically deployed scale, starting term, several measures have reduce reverse warming. Others can exert local regional influences. The world needs an approach extends beyond sole reliance on emission reductions removal. We propose (i) researching, field testing deploying one more large-scale influence(s) perhaps initially polar regions applying also support adaptation, (ii) accelerating emissions with early prioritization short-lived drivers, (iii) large scale carbon draw down legacy greenhouse gas. authors make no attempt determine what mix optimal. That depend modeling experimentation. properly researched emergency “tourniquets,” near-term our “bleeding” Earth we slow then ongoing increasingly severe 21st Century.
Language: Английский
Citations
2Cooperation and Conflict, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Aug. 18, 2024
The Arctic has been identified by scientists as a relatively promising venue for controversial ‘solar geoengineering’ – technical schemes to reflect more sunlight counteract global warming. Yet contemporary regional security dynamics and the relative (in)significance of climate concerns among key states suggest different conclusion. By systematically juxtaposing recently published geoengineering with strategies littoral China, we reveal detail two conflicting imaginaries. Geoengineering scientifically securitise (and seek maintain) Arctic’s ‘great white shield’ protect ‘global’ humanity against tipping points invoke past era ‘exceptionality’ greater political feasibility research interventions here. Meanwhile, state imaginaries understand an increasingly contested region considerable geopolitical peril economic opportunity temperatures rise. Alongside entangled history science geopolitics in region, this suggests that are unlikely follow scientific visions, unless co-opted into competitive, extractivist imaginaries, may prove entirely infeasible. Moreover, if is ‘best-case’ politics, places huge question mark over other, prospects.
Language: Английский
Citations
2Elsevier eBooks, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
0