
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 100345 - 100345
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 100345 - 100345
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
The Internet and Higher Education, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 100996 - 100996
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1Computers & Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 105224 - 105224
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
5British Educational Research Journal, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2025
Abstract This study provides a comparative assessment of the capabilities leading artificial intelligence (AI) tools and human participants in business management education context. Specifically, we (a) assess how well current language models perform providing answers to standardised essay‐type assessments context, (b) examine efficacy emergent detecting AI‐generated texts (c) evaluate online AI rewriting paraphrasing their evading detection. Using an exploratory qualitative design, this generated evaluated 15 standard essays using ChatGPT ( n = 5), Bard 5) 5). A comparison is provided between average performance AI‐derived that ChatGPT‐generated across all five essays. The results suggest content can achieve reasonably high marks assessments. According findings study, AI's highly influenced by types prompts used, user's experience degree which user discern relevant irrelevant content. findings, Turnitin's detection tool effective at has been created AI, but effectiveness reduced rewriters. Turnitin tool, however, significantly more identifying compared with ChatGPT. results, produced better when clear outlined topic expectations, divided tasks into sections fed conversational manner train model. By utilising chatbots effectively, traditional teaching methods be supplemented targeted engaging learning experiences.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 100365 - 100365
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0TechTrends, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 19, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Teaching and Teacher Education, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 159, С. 104980 - 104980
Опубликована: Март 12, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Computers in Human Behavior, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 165, С. 108538 - 108538
Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
4Journal of Asian Public Policy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 29
Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2024
As Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) rapidly integrates into higher education, a critical question arises: should we focus on the technology's potential or essential role of stakeholders? While GAI offers transformative possibilities, its success hinges students, educators, administrators, and policymakers. This study examines structure these stakeholders patterns relationships between them. Utilizing systematic literature review, screened 224 studies selected 38 key articles to construct hierarchical framework illustrating complex interactions among stakeholders. The research reveals prominence administrators while reflecting increasing attention technology vendors government agencies. Interactions primarily fall four patterns: cooperation, control guidance, support dependency, as well competition conflict. Although existing extensively discusses GAI's potential, this argues that in-depth analyses stakeholder roles are lacking, particularly given real-world complexities. Future explore multidimensional promote responsible effective use in education.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 100345 - 100345
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0