Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Март 28, 2024
Abstract
We
designed
the
Relative
Risk
Tool
(RRT)
to
help
people
assess
relative
risks
associated
with
COVID-19
vaccination
and
infection.
In
May
2022
(
N
=
400)
November
615),
U.S.
residents
participated
in
a
survey
that
included
questions
about
of
both
cohorts,
we
found
an
association
between
risk
perception
vaccine
hesitancy.
Participants
cohort
were
randomly
assigned
intervention:
see
information
from
RRT
or
Centers
for
Disease
Control
Prevention
(CDC).
After
intervention,
participants
answered
same
intent
again.
The
was
more
effective
than
CDC
at
changing
increasing
intent.
November,
structure
same,
but
only
intervention
included,
confirmed
opinions
this
new
sample.
Importantly,
provided
accurate
serious
adverse
outcomes
still
increased
Our
work
suggests
helps
risk,
which
can
turn
empower
them
make
informed
decisions
ultimately
reduce
Health Psychology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
43(6), С. 426 - 437
Опубликована: Март 4, 2024
We
introduce
and
report
early
stage
testing
of
a
novel,
multicomponent
intervention
that
can
be
used
by
healthcare
professionals
(HCPs)
to
address
false
or
misleading
antivaccination
arguments
while
maintaining
empathy
for
understanding
people's
motivations
believe
misinformation:
the
"Empathetic
Refutational
Interview"
(ERI).
European journal of psychotraumatology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
15(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2024
:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
health-care
workers
(HCWs)
may
have
been
confronted
with
situations
that
culminate
in
moral
injury
(MI).
MI
is
psychological
distress
result
from
perpetrating
or
witnessing
actions
violate
one's
codes.
Literature
suggests
can
be
associated
mental
health
problems.
Abstract
Background
The
enduring
presence
of
COVID-19
skepticism
and
SARS-CoV-2
vaccine
hesitancy
is
an
ongoing
impediment
to
the
global
response
effort
current
pandemic.
This
study
seeks
identify
determinants
in
U.S.
adults.
Methods
Data
are
from
Values
Beliefs
American
Public
Survey,
conducted
2021
by
Gallup
Organization
conjunction
with
Baylor
University.
survey
used
stratified
random
probability
sampling
adult
population
(
N
=
1222).
Outcome
measures
were
respective
single
items
assessing
hesitancy.
Exposure
variables
included
political,
religious,
sociodemographic
indicators,
moderators
assessed
personal
history
losing
a
relative
or
close
friend
COVID-19.
Results
Skepticism
strongly
associated
conservative
Republican
political
preference
religious
beliefs,
less
so
socioeconomic
status.
Personal
experience
did
not
mitigate
effect
politics
on
barely
reduced
odds
for
confirm
that
attitudes
toward
politically
religiously
conditioned,
especially
product
preference.
Conclusion
about
regarding
vaccination
highest
among
right.
Efforts
increase
immunization
through
public
education
may
be
inadequate;
resistance
appears
ideological.
Other
solutions
need
considered,
which
risk
widespread
pushback
both
motivated.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
17(6), С. e0267734 - e0267734
Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2022
Vaccine
hesitancy
remains
an
issue
in
the
United
States.
This
study
conducted
online
survey
[N
=
3,013]
using
Social
Science
Research
Solution
[SSRS]
Opinion
Panel
web
panelists,
representative
of
U.S.
adults
age
18
and
older
who
use
internet,
with
oversample
rural-dwelling
minority
populations
between
April
8
22,
2021-
as
vaccine
eligibility
opened
to
country.
We
examined
relationship
COVID-19
exposure
socio-demographics
intentions
[eager-to-take,
wait-and-see,
undecided,
refuse]
among
unvaccinated
multinomial
logistic
regressions
[ref:
fully/partially
vaccinated].
Results
showed
varied
by
demographic
characteristics
experience
during
period
that
for
was
extended
all
adults.
At
time
approximately
40%
respondents
were
unvaccinated;
41%
knew
someone
had
died
COVID-19,
38%
experienced
financial
hardship
a
result
pandemic.
The
vaccinated
more
likely
be
highly
educated,
adults,
consistent
States
initial
criteria.
Political
affiliation
pandemic
two
most
salient
factors
associated
being
undecided
or
unwilling
take
vaccine.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
20(1), С. 665 - 665
Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2022
The
goal
of
this
research
was
to
provide
an
overview
the
role
trust
in
determining
COVID-19
vaccine
acceptance.
Trust
proved
be
a
key
issue
all
strategic
phases
pandemic,
decisive
element
for
success
worldwide
vaccination
campaign.
By
introducing
comprehensive
systematic
review
state-of-the-art
(N
=
43),
we
intend
shed
light
on
various
forms
that
have
been
considered
and
how
these
relate
citizens’
analysis
shows
has
used
extensively,
with
particular
reference
vaccine,
governments,
manufacturers,
healthcare
systems,
science.
A
more
in-depth
also
allowed
us
evaluate
factors
had
social
phenomena
which
they
decisive.
Most
notably,
that,
different
contributions,
strong
correlation
acceptance
(R
0.78,
p
<
0.01).
Overall,
emerges
as
complex
phenomenon
needs
understood
through
strictly
interlaced
relations
coming
into
play.
Besides
clarifying
what
happened
previous
years,
considerations
included
work
represent
important
useful
interpretative
framework
help
public
institutions
system
future.
Health Communication,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 14
Опубликована: Фев. 25, 2025
This
study
examines
how
message
frame
and
individual
differences
in
collectivism
perceived
risk
influence
intention
to
engage
precautionary
measures
for
COVID-19.
We
investigate
the
relationships
with
two
types
of
preventive
that
differ
features
relevant
hypothesis
like
uncertainty
or
about
outcome
health
behaviors:
vaccination
mask-wearing.
conducted
separate
online
experiments
each
behavior,
respectively.
The
results
reveal
individuals
a
moderate
collectivist
orientation
had
higher
wear
face
mask
than
those
very
low
when
exposed
gain-framed
message,
but
there
was
no
difference
loss-framed
message.
were
only
significant
among
people
No
such
effects
are
found
intention.
BMC Health Services Research,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
23(1)
Опубликована: Май 2, 2023
Abstract
Background
While
many
healthcare
providers
(HCPs)
have
navigated
patients’
vaccine
concerns
and
questions
prior
to
the
rollout
of
COVID-19
vaccines,
sentiments
surrounding
vaccines
presented
new
distinct
challenges.
Objective
To
understand
provider
experience
counseling
patients
about
vaccinations,
aspects
pandemic
environment
that
impacted
trust,
communication
strategies
found
supportive
patient
education.
Methods
7
focus
groups
were
conducted
recorded
during
December
2021
January
2022,
at
height
Omicron
wave
in
United
States.
Recordings
transcribed,
iterative
coding
analysis
was
applied.
Results
44
group
participants
representing
24
US
states
with
majority
(80%)
fully
vaccinated
time
data
collection.
Most
doctors
(34%)
or
physician’s
assistants
nurse
practitioners
(34%).
The
negative
impact
misinformation
on
patient-provider
both
intrapersonal
interpersonal
levels
as
well
barriers
facilitators
uptake
are
reported.
People
sources
play
a
role
health
(“messengers”)
persuasive
messages
behavior
attitudes
towards
vaccination
(“messages”)
described.
Providers
expressed
frustration
need
continuously
address
clinical
appointments
among
who
remained
unvaccinated.
Many
value
resources
provided
up-to-date
evidence-based
information
guidelines
continued
change.
Additionally,
indicated
patient-facing
materials
designed
support
education
not
frequently
available,
but
they
most
valuable
changing
environment.
Conclusions
decision-making
is
complex
hinges
diverse
factors
such
care
access
(i.e.,
convenience,
expense)
individual
knowledge,
can
major
navigating
these
their
patients.
But
strengthen
promote
uptake,
comprehensive
infrastructure
must
be
sustained
dyad.
findings
provide
recommendations
maintain
an
facilitates
effective
provider-patient
community,
organizational
policy
levels.
There
for
unified
multisectoral
response
reinforce
settings.
