Health Risk & Society,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
25(5-6), С. 252 - 267
Опубликована: Апрель 2, 2023
AbstractYoung
adults
are
the
most
prominent
users
of
cannabis
in
Canada,
which
was
legalised
for
recreational
use
2018.
Edibles
a
highly
popular
form
delivery
this
age
group,
yet
little
qualitative
research
explores
young
adult
perspectives
on
edibles,
including
how
edibles
function
socially
them,
or
viewed
terms
risk.
This
study
fills
gap,
conducting
focus
groups
with
57
(ages-18–24)
Calgary,
Alberta,
Canada
to
explore
‘risk
object’
edibles.
Findings
reveal
that
mechanism
–
is,
food
compared
smoked/inhaled
significantly
shifts
perceptions
risk
by
adults.
were
as
less
risky
than
smoking
cannabis,
and
participants
stated
they
more
willing
consume
any
other
(and
especially
social
settings).
Risks
associated
primarily
short-term/related
over-consumption
largely
mitigated
legalisation.
However,
also
emphasised
risks
others
(including
children
inexperienced
consumers).
Overall,
depending
audience
considered.
Participants
described
individual
consumers
shouldering
primary
responsibility
managing
related
despite
manufacturer
government
roles
regulating
product
quality
protecting
vulnerable
populations.Keywords:
ediblescannabisriskyoung
adultshealthlegalization
AcknowledgmentsThe
authors
gratefully
acknowledge
Research
Chairs
Program
(Dr.
Elliott),
Alberta
Children’s
Hospital
Institute
O’Brien
Public
Health,
provided
funding
study.Disclosure
statementNo
potential
conflict
interest
reported
authors.Data
availability
statementThe
data
support
findings
available
from
lead
author
(CE)
request.Notes1.
The
shifting
nature
when
it
comes
is
taken
up
Elliott
(2020).Additional
informationFundingThe
work
supported
[.];
Health
[.].
Objective:
Sexual
minority
women
(SMW)
have
higher
rates
of
cannabis
use
compared
to
heterosexual
women,
which
may
be
partially
attributed
lower
harm
perceptions.
However,
no
study
has
examined
if
the
association
between
perceptions
and
is
stronger
for
SMW
than
women.
This
sexual
identity
(SMW
vs.
woman)
moderated
past
30-day
among
a
sample
female
young
adults
(18-25
years
old).
Method:
Participants
were
949
(29.8%
SMW;
Mean
age
=
24.33;
92.1%
non-Hispanic
White)
females
(99.3%
cisgender)
recruited
from
Amazon
Mechanical
Turk
who
reported
weekly
use.
how
many
days
they
used
in
30-days
harmful
perceived
their
health
(not
at
all/slightly/somewhat
very/extremely
harmful).
An
Analysis
Covariance
aim.
Results:
A
significantly
larger
percentage
(45.2%
22.6%).
Those
more
frequent
past-30
days.
relative
those
held
perceptions;
there
significant
differences
Conclusions:
perceive
as
because
experiencing
consequences
It
important
interventions
public
campaigns
tailored
specifically
include
information
about
potential
harms
JAMA Network Open,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
8(4), С. e255819 - e255819
Опубликована: Апрель 18, 2025
Importance
A
year
after
dried
cannabis
was
legalized
across
Canada
in
October
2018,
Canadian
provinces
except
Quebec
sales
of
edibles
and
extracts,
including
youth-friendly
such
as
chocolates,
candies,
desserts
vaping
products.
Little
is
known
about
the
association
this
legalization
with
adolescent
use.
Objective
To
investigate
changes
use
harm
perceptions
associated
extracts
Canada.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
serial
cross-sectional
study
analyzed
data
from
students
grades
7
to
11
who
participated
nationally
representative
Student
Tobacco
Alcohol
Drugs
Surveys
2018
2019
2021
2022.
differences-in-differences
design
compared
outcomes
that
where
products
were
banned.
Data
June
2024
January
2025.
Exposure
Legalization
(except
Quebec)
2019.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
The
primary
past
12
months,
12-month
edible
use,
smoking,
vaping,
co-use
alcohol
cannabis.
Secondary
perception
occasional
regular
Results
In
sample
106
032
(54
441
male
[weighted
percentage,
51.3%]),
between
2022,
increased
14.6%
(6081
41
477
students)
15.9%
(6163
38
675
7.9%
(3268
373
9.5%
(3678
556
extracts.
Meanwhile,
declined
17.4%
(2264
13
030
15.6%
(1960
550
7.3%
(955
002
5.9%
(739
533
Quebec.
Regression
analyses
indicated
a
3.8
percentage
point
(95%
CI,
1.1
6.6
points;
P
=
.01)
or
26%
increase
3.4
1.9
4.9
.001)
43%
among
adolescents.
While
there
no
statistically
significant
change
legalization,
smoking
by
4.4
points
1.8
7.0
.004)
34%
2.4
0.5
4.3
.02)
28%.
also
lower
Conclusions
Relevance
adolescents
11,
an
not
only
but
overall
prevalence
cannabis,
highlighting
need
for
stricter
policy
measures
curb
adolescents’
access
greater
awareness
harms
Little
is
known
about
health-focused
cannabis
use
purposes
and
their
associations
with
risk
for
problematic
use.
This
cross-sectional
study
examined
three
broad
association
among
young
adult
users
who
report
using
>
1
health
reasons.Young
adults
completed
an
electronic
survey
as
part
of
ongoing
on
substance
health.
Those
self-reported
past
6-month
≥
products-smoking,
vaping,
dabbing,
eating,
blunts-were
included
in
the
analysis.
Their
were
coded
into
categories:
sleep,
mental,
physical
Problematic
(PCU)
was
measured
three-level
structure
Cannabis
Abuse
Screening
Test
(CAST-3).
Adjusted
multivariable
regression
models
used
to
estimate
associated
at
p
<
0.05
level.Participants
(n
=
954)
mostly
female
(63.94%)
Hispanic
(54.93%).
Mental
most
endorsed
reason
(73.38%)
sample.
Among
participants,
36.3%
classified
being
severe
(CAST-3
score
8).
There
a
significant
between
PCU
reporting
(p
0.01),
mental
health,
sleep
0.01)
purposes.
heath
had
four
times
(adjusted
relative
ratio
(aRRR)
4.38,
95%
CI
3.06-6.69),
those
(aRRR
2.81,
1.86-4.72),
almost
two
1.83,
1.17-2.63)
PCU.All
increased
Physical
highest
risk.
demonstrates
disorder
self-medicating
cannabis.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
21(8), С. 986 - 986
Опубликована: Июль 27, 2024
Given
diversified
cannabis
products,
we
examined
associations
between
consumption
methods
and
risk
perception
of
smoking
1–2
times
a
week.
Using
the
2022
U.S.
National
Survey
on
Drug
Use
Health
data
(N
=
12,796
past-year
adult
users;
M
6127
F
6669),
used
multinomial
binary
logistic
regression
models.
Smoking
was
most
prevalent
method,
followed
by
eating/drinking,
vaping,
dabbing.
One-half
users
reported
no
perceived
week,
37.5%
slight
risk,
9.2%
moderate
2.9%
great
risk.
Those
with
or
had
lower
likelihood
using
4+
(e.g.,
RRR
0.40,
95%
CI
0.20,
0.77
for
perception).
Any
associated
higher
odds
edibles/drinks
only
aOR
2.81,
1.43,
5.54
Along
medical
use
CUD,
sociodemographic
factors,
mental
illness,
other
substance
were
also
significant
correlates
methods.
Understanding
varying
perceptions
different
is
needed
harm
reduction
initiatives.
More
research
particularly
dabs/concentrates,
to
better
understand
potential
risks
them.