Applied Thermal Engineering, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 248, С. 123240 - 123240
Опубликована: Апрель 23, 2024
Язык: Английский
Applied Thermal Engineering, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 248, С. 123240 - 123240
Опубликована: Апрель 23, 2024
Язык: Английский
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 48, С. 102407 - 102407
Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
37Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 170, С. 139 - 156
Опубликована: Дек. 2, 2022
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
61Fuel, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 348, С. 128457 - 128457
Опубликована: Май 12, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
35Energy Conversion and Management, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 295, С. 117645 - 117645
Опубликована: Сен. 11, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
26Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 187, С. 549 - 580
Опубликована: Май 7, 2024
Gas turbine cycles (GTC), internal combustion engines (ICE), and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are three important sources of waste energy, although some studies have been done about their heat recovery (WHR) systems individually, there is a lack study comparing them to select the best solution. In present research, steam Rankine cycle, CO2 supercritical Brayton cycle (SBC), inverse (IBC), air bottoming used for WHR high-temperature exhausted gas 500 kW natural gas-fueled GTC ICE. Furthermore, organic (ORC), trilateral flash Kalina SBC utilized SOFC-gas (GT). The performance 13 proposed configurations compared through 4E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic, environmental) three-objective optimizations. Considering exergy efficiency, total cost rate, unit products as target functions, SOFC-GT-ORC system has with 64.74%, 92.51 $/h, 19.03 $/GJ. GTC-IBC ICE-IBC in respective categories.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
10Energy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 134994 - 134994
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 105810 - 105810
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1Energy Conversion and Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 332, С. 119762 - 119762
Опубликована: Апрель 5, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1The Science of The Total Environment, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 927, С. 171983 - 171983
Опубликована: Апрель 2, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2024
The necessity of energy solutions that are economically viable, ecologically sustainable and environmentally friendly has become fundamental to economic societal advancement nations. In this context, renewable sources emerge as the most vital component. Furthermore, hydrogen generation systems based on energies increasingly recognized crucial strategies mitigate global warming. present study, a comparative analysis is conducted from an exergy-economic perspective find efficient configuration among three different for renewable-based power production. These wind turbine, salinity gradient solar pond (SGSP), ocean thermal conversion (OTEC). SGSP OTEC coupled with production unit by trilateral cycle (TLC) improve temperature match heating process. heat waste within these recovered thermoelectric generator (TEG), proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEME) used Under base case input conditions, net PEME estimated be approximately 327.8 kW across all configurations. Additionally, 3E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic) performance evaluated parametric study design optimization. results best reveal exergy efficiency achievable wind-based system in range 5.8–10.47% average speed 8–12 m/s. Correspondingly, favorable total cost rate attributed at 8 m/s, equating 66.08 USD/h. Subsequently, SGSP-based economical, ranging 42.78 44.31 USD/GJ.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7