Multi-aspect optimization of a geothermal-based integrated Kalina-proton exchange membrane fuel cell with ejector cooling and desalination systems DOI
Tao Hai, A.S. El-Shafay, Amin Salih Mohammed

et al.

Applied Thermal Engineering, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 231, P. 120806 - 120806

Published: June 3, 2023

Language: Английский

Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyzes of a new biomass/solar-driven multigeneration energy system: An effort to maximum utilization of the waste heat of gasification process DOI
Amir Ghasemi, Hima Nikafshan Rad, Mohammad Akrami

et al.

Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 48, P. 102407 - 102407

Published: Jan. 16, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

35
Multi-criteria evaluation and optimization of a new multigeneration cycle based on solid oxide fuel cell and biomass fuel integrated with a thermoelectric generator, gas turbine, and methanation cycle DOI
Hongliang Wang,

Zhanguo Su,

Azher M. Abed

et al.

Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 170, P. 139 - 156

Published: Dec. 2, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

61
4E analysis and optimization of a biomass-fired waste-to-energy plant integrated with a compressed air energy storage system for the multi-generation purpose DOI
Tao Hai,

Mohammad Zoghi,

Kourosh Javaherdeh

et al.

Fuel, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 348, P. 128457 - 128457

Published: May 12, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

35
Thermoeconomic and optimization approaches for integrating cooling, power, and green hydrogen production in dairy plants with a novel solar-biomass cascade ORC system DOI

B. Karthikeyan,

G. Praveen Kumar

Energy Conversion and Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 295, P. 117645 - 117645

Published: Sept. 11, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

23
4E optimization comparison of different bottoming systems for waste heat recovery of gas turbine cycles, internal combustion engines, and solid oxide fuel cells in power-hydrogen production systems DOI Creative Commons

Mohammad Zoghi,

Nasser Hosseinzadeh,

Saleh Gharaie

et al.

Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 187, P. 549 - 580

Published: May 7, 2024

Gas turbine cycles (GTC), internal combustion engines (ICE), and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are three important sources of waste energy, although some studies have been done about their heat recovery (WHR) systems individually, there is a lack study comparing them to select the best solution. In present research, steam Rankine cycle, CO2 supercritical Brayton cycle (SBC), inverse (IBC), air bottoming used for WHR high-temperature exhausted gas 500 kW natural gas-fueled GTC ICE. Furthermore, organic (ORC), trilateral flash Kalina SBC utilized SOFC-gas (GT). The performance 13 proposed configurations compared through 4E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic, environmental) three-objective optimizations. Considering exergy efficiency, total cost rate, unit products as target functions, SOFC-GT-ORC system has with 64.74%, 92.51 $/h, 19.03 $/GJ. GTC-IBC ICE-IBC in respective categories.

Language: Английский

Citations

10
Optimization and 4E Analysis of a Hybrid Solar-Methane System for Hydrogen and Freshwater Production with Enhanced Waste Heat Recovery from Compressed Air Energy Storage System DOI
Wei Zhou,

Yaoting Lin

Energy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 134994 - 134994

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Capacity of waste heat recovery-based polygeneration to achieve sustainable development goals DOI

M. Ghema,

A. El Fadar,

O.B. Achkari

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 927, P. 171983 - 171983

Published: April 2, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

7
Energy and exergy-economic performance comparison of wind, solar pond, and ocean thermal energy conversion systems for green hydrogen production DOI Creative Commons

Mohammad Zoghi,

Nasser Hosseinzadeh,

Saleh Gharaie

et al.

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 1, 2024

The necessity of energy solutions that are economically viable, ecologically sustainable and environmentally friendly has become fundamental to economic societal advancement nations. In this context, renewable sources emerge as the most vital component. Furthermore, hydrogen generation systems based on energies increasingly recognized crucial strategies mitigate global warming. present study, a comparative analysis is conducted from an exergy-economic perspective find efficient configuration among three different for renewable-based power production. These wind turbine, salinity gradient solar pond (SGSP), ocean thermal conversion (OTEC). SGSP OTEC coupled with production unit by trilateral cycle (TLC) improve temperature match heating process. heat waste within these recovered thermoelectric generator (TEG), proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEME) used Under base case input conditions, net PEME estimated be approximately 327.8 kW across all configurations. Additionally, 3E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic) performance evaluated parametric study design optimization. results best reveal exergy efficiency achievable wind-based system in range 5.8–10.47% average speed 8–12 m/s. Correspondingly, favorable total cost rate attributed at 8 m/s, equating 66.08 USD/h. Subsequently, SGSP-based economical, ranging 42.78 44.31 USD/GJ.

Language: Английский

Citations

7
Eco-friendly multi-heat recovery applied to an innovative integration of flue gas-driven multigeneration process and geothermal power plant: Feasibility characterization from thermo-economic-environmental aspect DOI

Te Pang,

Luping Gao,

Wei Wu

et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 449, P. 141750 - 141750

Published: March 11, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

5
Waste heat recovery of a combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle for gas turbine based multi-generation hydrogen and freshwater purposes: 4E comparison with a simple coupled Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle DOI Creative Commons

Mohammad Zoghi,

Nasser Hosseinzadeh,

Saleh Gharaie

et al.

Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 53, P. 102718 - 102718

Published: June 28, 2024

Using gas turbine cycles in power generation layouts can lead to a significant amount of waste energy. The combined Brayton and inverse cycle (IBC), which are used such systems, has considerable energy the heat rejection stage exhausted gas, not been considered previous studies. In present research, simple coupled IBC (Configuration 1) is compared with multi-generation system 2) hot water unit, thermoelectric generator (TEG), an absorption chiller added Configuration 1 for utilization IBC. Furthermore, produced TEG directed proton exchange membrane electrolyzer reverse osmosis desalination unit hydrogen potable outputs. Results show that although total investment cost rate 2 higher than 1, fuel rate, environmental exergy destruction lower. at best performance point, efficiency products equal 40.77% 63.19 $/GJ. They by 5% 2%, respectively. Hence, 2, lower consumption accessible.

Language: Английский

Citations

5