Promoting mental health in out of home care in Australia DOI
Katherine Monson,

Kristen Moeller‐Saxone,

Cathy Humphreys

и другие.

Health Promotion International, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 35(5), С. 1026 - 1036

Опубликована: Авг. 15, 2019

Abstract Young people in out of home care (OoHC) typically have worse mental health outcomes than peers who grow up within a family origin. Innovations to improve the this group tended focus on pathology rather promotion and prevention illnesses, are often costly challenging implement. This qualitative study explored perspectives from young with experience OoHC Melbourne, Australia regarding OoHC. The informed subsequent development system-level intervention support workers carers evaluation its implementation, Ripple study. We conducted thematic analysis data interviews groups 14 aged 18–24 years diverse identities experiences foster, kinship residential care. identified four key themes. These were providing home-like environment; having someone talk to; connecting wider community opportunities become an active citizen. There is need for both treatment approaches interventions Mental strategies should include enhancing existing capacities workers. depends strong intersectoral collaboration youth participation.

Язык: Английский

Physical activity interventions to improve the health of children and adolescents in out of home care – A systematic review of the literature DOI

Brendan Wilson,

Lisa M. Barnett

Children and Youth Services Review, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 110, С. 104765 - 104765

Опубликована: Янв. 13, 2020

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

23

What Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions Work for Which Children and Young People in Care? Systematic Review of Potential Outcome Inequities DOI Creative Commons
Rhiannon Evans, Rob Trubey, Sarah MacDonald

и другие.

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 28, 2024

Abstract Children and young people with care-experience (e.g. foster, kinship residential care) report poorer mental health wellbeing than the general population. Despite an emerging evidence-base for intervention, it is not clear if current approaches create, exacerbate or mitigate outcome inequities between different types of participants. We conducted a systematic review international interventions targeting health, subjective suicide-related outcomes amongst care-experienced children aged up to 25 years old. The included narrative synthesis intervention inequities, exploring they were more less effective participant groups. Eight interventions, 14 study reports, presented relevant data. Overall, there was no evidence that participation could lead inequitable impacts, being However, some tentative indication individuals lower exposure maltreatment, fewer care placements, increased baseline problems, might be responsive other There limited data availability suicide. Future evaluation should focus on assessing potential sustain how may designed this risk.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Access to best‐evidenced mental health support for care‐experienced young people: Learnings from the implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD DOI Creative Commons
Rosie McGuire, Richard Meiser‐Stedman, Patrick Smith

и другие.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Июль 16, 2024

Abstract Objectives Rates of PTSD are up to 12 times higher in care‐experienced young people (CEYP) compared their peers. Trauma‐focused CBTs (tf‐CBT) the best‐evidenced treatment for youth with PTSD, yet, practice, CEYP often struggle access this treatment. We worked alongside services understand barriers and facilitators implementation cognitive therapy (a type tf‐CBT) CEYP. Design This was an active, open trial. Methods recruited 28 mental health teams across England, including general CAMHS, targeted CAMHS social care‐based teams. From these teams, participants were 243 professionals, from a wide variety professional backgrounds. Following recruitment/intervention training, participated rolling three monthly focus groups individual interviews, what helped hindered implementation. Data analysed using framework analysis conducted CFIR 2.0. Results Almost half able implement, but only approximately one quarter CEYP, specifically. Universal that discussed by almost all particularly highlighted service structures poor resourcing as major delivery well complexities person network. Unique factors differentiated who did not implement included commissioning practices, culture team, leadership engagement style, development supervision structures. Conclusions Findings offer key considerations leads, commissioners policy‐makers enhance treatments like CT‐PTSD,

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

[Parenting stress in long‐term foster carers: A longitudinal study] DOI Creative Commons
Hans Bugge Bergsund, Tore Wentzel‐Larsen, Heidi Jacobsen

и другие.

Child & Family Social Work, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 25(S1), С. 53 - 62

Опубликована: Ноя. 26, 2019

Abstract Background Children in foster care tend to exhibit adverse psychosocial functioning, and parents experience high levels of stress related their role as carers. Methods The study included 60 children 42 living biological families a comparison group. Caregiver was measured using the Parenting Stress Index, while child problem behavior Strengths Difficulties Questionnaire. primary carer were assessed when 2, 3, 8 years, respectively. Results results showed higher scores for at all time points, with difference being most pronounced child. Problem also age years. Foster parent increased domains during course study. Child domain only significant predictor behavior. Conclusion are overall more stressed than parents, increasing over time. have problems, these problems closely carers' child‐related stress. Further implications reduction parenting discussed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

22

Promoting mental health in out of home care in Australia DOI
Katherine Monson,

Kristen Moeller‐Saxone,

Cathy Humphreys

и другие.

Health Promotion International, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 35(5), С. 1026 - 1036

Опубликована: Авг. 15, 2019

Abstract Young people in out of home care (OoHC) typically have worse mental health outcomes than peers who grow up within a family origin. Innovations to improve the this group tended focus on pathology rather promotion and prevention illnesses, are often costly challenging implement. This qualitative study explored perspectives from young with experience OoHC Melbourne, Australia regarding OoHC. The informed subsequent development system-level intervention support workers carers evaluation its implementation, Ripple study. We conducted thematic analysis data interviews groups 14 aged 18–24 years diverse identities experiences foster, kinship residential care. identified four key themes. These were providing home-like environment; having someone talk to; connecting wider community opportunities become an active citizen. There is need for both treatment approaches interventions Mental strategies should include enhancing existing capacities workers. depends strong intersectoral collaboration youth participation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

18