Participatory
and
collaborative
processes
of
co-production
in
sustainability
science
combineknowledge
generation
action,
take
place
within
the
situations
addressed
by
policies
orinterventions,
stimulate
mutual
learning
through
inter-
transdisciplinary
methodologies.In
this
Chapter,
we
introduce
notion
practical
causal
knowledge
for
sustainability.
Usingexamples
from
participatory
modelling,
highlight
that
generated
coproductionin
can
be
both
practical.
It
is
as
it
allows
forunderstanding
complex
dynamics
underpinning
problems
potentialsolutions
ways
are
sensitive
to
context,
comprehensive,
inclusive.
bothbecause
emerges
because
oriented
towards
activities
performed
bydiverse
scientific
non-scientific
actors
specific
understand
addresscomplex
problems.
We
argue
an
appropriate
philosophical
account
practicalcausal
requires
major
shifts
existing
accounts
of‘causal
use
action’,
tailored
fields
not
andcollaborative.
conclude
arguing
does
notaim
predict
control
change,
but
help
navigate
find
orientationwithin
irreducibly
situations.
Ecosystems and People,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(1)
Опубликована: Март 19, 2023
The
importance
of
collaborative
approaches
to
governing
social-ecological
systems
(SES)
towards
more
transformative
outcomes
is
now
widely
acknowledged.
Theoretical
and
meth-
odological
frameworks
enable
such
collaborations
are
being
developed
across
a
range
disciplines.
Transdisciplinary
emerging
as
key
enabler
potentially
trans-
formative
in
SES,
particularly
where
these
characterized
by
'multiple
multi-
ples'
(e.g.
multiple
scales,
knowledge
systems,
etc.).
A
typical
approach
studying
complex
initiatives
contexts
comparative
case
study
research,
often
relying
on
researchers
embedded
cases.
In
this
approach,
qualitative
studies
coded
using
predetermined
variables
(based
ecological,
social,
features
cases)
comparison
cross-case
analysis.
our
experience,
the
process
coding
cases
into
quantitative
analysis
framework
can
be
hampered
what
we
term
'sticky
variables',
i.e.
which
difficult
code
for
reasons
related
aspects
intrinsic
complexity
systems.
Based
from
geographic
locations
Global
North
South,
identify
sticky
variables,
elucidate
their
'stickiness'.
We
propose
several
ways
working
with
learning
reflect
theoretical,
methodological
reflexive
transdisciplinary
research
collaborations.
Moreover,
suggest
that
might
'flags'
interesting
underlying
factors
influence
collaboration.
conclude
drawing
out
recommendations
practitioners
confronted
complexities
nuances
around
world.
Ecosystems and People,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 26, 2023
Postsecondary
and
informal
professional
educational
opportunities
have
increasingly
become
an
important
mode
of
supporting
the
understanding,
dissemination,
application
ecosystem
services
(ES).
The
development
activities
group
characteristics
(e.g.
a
shared
vocabulary,
common
objectives,
dedication
time)
together
with
teaching
education
are
instrumental
for
institutionalization
new
ideas,
concepts,
disciplines
in
society.
Integrating
ES
into
postsecondary
can
help
us
to
understand
complex
human-environment
interactions
shape
policy
towards
greater
socio-ecological
sustainability.
This
study
analyzes
current
status
ES-related
programs
courses
offered
at
levels
around
world.
We
collected
data
English
on
these
mid-2020
using
Internet
searches,
crowdsourcing
techniques,
personal
knowledge
discovered
20
degree-granting
112
focused
or
related
ES.
Our
analyses
suggest
that
most
is
uncoordinated
aimed
graduate
students
(master's
doctorate
level),
but
also
interdisciplinary
emphasis
as
plural
concept.
argue
continued
evolution
depends
concept's
integration
more
attention
should
be
paid
modes
sharing
building.
analysis
adds
understanding
available
formal
learning
about
provides
lens
by
which
we
envision
pathways
increasing
reach
effectiveness
training.
Environmental
degradation,
climate
change,
and
issues
of
social
justice
highlight
the
need
to
develop
transition
more
sustainable
modes
production,
consumption,
living.
Livestock
farming
in
Germany
is
a
sector
that
concerned
transition,
being
characterized
by
multitude
socio-ecological
both
discursive
legislative
pressure
change.
While
this
marked
persistent
mechanisms
culture
practices,
bioeconomic
innovation
actors
are
developing
innovations
may
contribute
sustainability-oriented
transitions
sector.
This
context
presents
possibility
observe
making.
Against
backdrop,
dissertation,
I
aim
at
understanding
mechanisms,
actors,
processes
currently
unfolding
livestock
focus
on
innovations,
incumbents,
imagined
futures.
operationalize
via
four
complementary
qualitative
case
studies,
focusing
(i)
contesting
imaginations
manure
futures
how
these
shape
trajectories
farming,
(ii)
role
contributing
toward
(iii)
as
shaped
technological
fixes,
last,
(iv)
farmers
incumbents
embedded
existing
regime
their
in/ability
drive
institutional
changes.
My
empirical
results
show
three
different
transitions,
namely
preservation,
modernization,
transformation.
These
Bioeconomic
intensive
system
imaginaries
follow
classical
paradigms,
have
rather
low
ability
reconfiguring
beyond
actor-technology
configurations.
On
contrary,
they
accompanied
expectations,
attract
capital
investments,
which
pose
risk
“colonizing”
future
through
sunken
costs
extra-semiotic
inscription
material
physical
infrastructures.
Farmers
very
stable
systems,
externalize
locale
experience
agency
for
Transitions
thus
mainly
visible
changes
configuration
result
adoption
driven
exogenous
such
NGOs
political-legislative
(e.g.,
EU’s
nitrate
directive
German
fertilizer
ordinance)
semiotic
space.
lack
capacity
imagine
real
alternatives
navigate
themselves.
In
addition
results,
my
dissertation
elucidates
important
sustainability
transitions.
Imagined
not
only
provide
spirit
but
also
same
time
diagnosis
present
problem(s)
individuals
collectives
regard
Without
alternative
futures,
reconfigure
limited.
Actors
with
material-semiotic
relationships
often
reductionist
problem
frames
issues,
while
complex
frames.
order
be
able
act
purposefully
despite
complexity
uncertainty,
relations
rely
frames,
established
inscribed
forms
change
or
conceptions
no
Relying
cognitive
path
dependencies
colonization
future.
The
underlying
underscores
avoid
phenomena
appearing,
it
great
importance
integrate
actors’
views
problems,
e.g.,
means
transdisciplinary
research
projects.
Here,
can
discuss
normative
orientations,
conflicting
views,
meaningful
current
system.
support
new
design
implemented,
could
help
navigating
experiencing
moment
Based
synthesis
theoretical
contributions
research,
sketches
avenues
an
in-depth
govern
these.
conclude
systems
allow
exchange
knowledge
contacts
bring
perspectives
systems.
achieve
these,
genuine
limited
because,
without
cultural
imaginative
input,
will
merely
reproduce
itself.
processes,
must
treated
arena
imaginations,
ontologies,
transformative
imaginations.
To
reproducing
reinforcing
power
hegemonies
structure
deliberative
challenged
adaptive
plural
accordingly
just
transformations
beyond.
Participatory
and
collaborative
processes
of
co-production
in
sustainability
science
combineknowledge
generation
action,
take
place
within
the
situations
addressed
by
policies
orinterventions,
stimulate
mutual
learning
through
inter-
transdisciplinary
methodologies.In
this
Chapter,
we
introduce
notion
practical
causal
knowledge
for
sustainability.
Usingexamples
from
participatory
modelling,
highlight
that
generated
coproductionin
can
be
both
practical.
It
is
as
it
allows
forunderstanding
complex
dynamics
underpinning
problems
potentialsolutions
ways
are
sensitive
to
context,
comprehensive,
inclusive.
bothbecause
emerges
because
oriented
towards
activities
performed
bydiverse
scientific
non-scientific
actors
specific
understand
addresscomplex
problems.
We
argue
an
appropriate
philosophical
account
practicalcausal
requires
major
shifts
existing
accounts
of‘causal
use
action’,
tailored
fields
not
andcollaborative.
conclude
arguing
does
notaim
predict
control
change,
but
help
navigate
find
orientationwithin
irreducibly
situations.