Unveiling relational values in agroecosystems through participatory video in a tropical agroforest frontier DOI
Savilu Fuente-Cid, M. Azahara Mesa‐Jurado, Mariana Pineda-Vázquez

и другие.

Agriculture and Human Values, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 2, 2024

Язык: Английский

Landscapes—a lens for assessing sustainability DOI Creative Commons
Marie C. Dade, Aletta Bonn, Felix Eigenbrod

и другие.

Landscape Ecology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 40(2)

Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2025

There are urgent calls to transition society more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes provide equitable access ecosystem services essential human wellbeing both current and future generations, provides an operational approach monitor these transitions. However, complexity of complicates how what consider when assessing LS. To identify important features that remain challenging in LS assessments guidance strengthen assessments. We conducted two workshops complex under-considered assessments, developed guidelines on better incorporate features. open connected boundaries diversity values as landscape must be considered risk exacerbating offstage burdens power inequalities. avoid pitfalls which emphasize service interactions across interconnected incorporating actors' diverse values. Our a stepping stone researchers practitioners complexities into inform landscape-level decisions actions.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Editorial overview: Leveraging the multiple values of nature for transformative change to just and sustainable futures — Insights from the IPBES Values Assessment DOI Open Access
Unai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera, Mike Christie

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101359 - 101359

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

24

Are Stakeholders Aware of the Contributions of Ecosystem Services for Their Well-Being? A Case Study of a UNESCO Geopark Project in Brazil DOI
Paula Oddone Souza, Daniel Callo-Concha, Hannah Kamau

и другие.

Human Ecology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 14, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice DOI Creative Commons
Marije Schaafsma,

Seongho Ahn,

Antonio Arjona Castro

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101350 - 101350

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods approaches exist to assess diverse value types. evidence is based largest review academic studies nature date, developed for (IPBES). We evaluate according environmental justice criteria. results suggest although types indicators are assessed across studies, few individual plural, fail provide distributive score low procedural indicators. a set recommendations incorporating issues in design studies.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

17

Incorporating diverse values of nature in decision-making—theory and practice DOI
Arild Vatn, Unai Pascual, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer

и другие.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 379(1903)

Опубликована: Апрель 21, 2024

Values play a significant role in decision-making, especially regarding nature. Decisions impact people and nature complex ways understanding which values are prioritised, left out is an important task for improving the equity effectiveness of decision-making. Based on work done IPBES Assessment, this paper develops framework to support analyses how decision-making influences as well whose get prioritised. The used analyse key areas environmental policy: a) present model protection market economies, b) valuation bringing into decisions, c) embedded policy instruments, exemplified by protected conservation payments ecosystem services. show that policies have been established mere additions structures foster economic expansion, undermines wide range nature's values. Moreover, themselves also focused limited set diverse This article part theme issue 'Bringing decision-making'.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

8

The pitfalls of plural valuation DOI Creative Commons
Sander Jacobs, Eszter Kelemen, Patrick O’Farrell

и другие.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 64, С. 101345 - 101345

Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2023

This paper critically examines the current political context in which valuation studies of nature are undertaken. It challenges belief that somehow, more and technically better will drive societal change toward just sustainable futures. Instead, we argue proposed practices risk to continue overrepresent values those who hold power dominate space, perpetuate discrimination views nondominant stakeholders. In tackling this politically sensitive issue, define a typology valuations, making explicit roles discrimination. is done provide professionals other actors with simple framework determine if actions activities constructive, inclusive, resolve injustices enable systemic change, or rather entrench status quo aggravate existing injustices. The objective buttress their decisions support, accept, improve, oppose, reject such valuations.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

12

Increasing uptake of ecosystem service assessments: best practice check-lists for practitioners in Europe DOI Creative Commons
David N. Barton, Bart Immerzeel, Luke Brander

и другие.

One Ecosystem, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 9

Опубликована: Июнь 14, 2024

Aiming at understanding the role of plural values in decision-making, IPBES Values Assessment defined nature valuation broadly as including biophysical, economic and socio-cultural assessments, ecosystem service assessment. reviews scientific literature revealed a lack documentation uptake by stakeholders across method types. The EU project SELINA aims to contribute increasing ES assessments different governance levels. This paper guidance national local applications compiling study design recommendations for from 111 documents on covering 12 European languages. Guidance are evaluated seven diagnostic topics suggested increase relevance robustness assessments: condition variables; capacity-potential; supply-demand; spatial scaling resolution capability; social health benefit compatibility; uncertainty develops these into set checklists practitioners contractors assessments. We find synergies between features gaps relation policy cycle. Checklists aimed projects self-assessing improving their implementation From knowledge supply perspective, this is expected likelihood results stakeholders. end with some cautions limitations perspectives demand political uses assessment knowledge.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Unveiling relational values in agroecosystems through participatory video in a tropical agroforest frontier DOI
Savilu Fuente-Cid, M. Azahara Mesa‐Jurado, Mariana Pineda-Vázquez

и другие.

Agriculture and Human Values, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Дек. 2, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0