Agriculture,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(10), С. 1665 - 1665
Опубликована: Окт. 11, 2022
From
the
perspective
of
water
resources,
revealing
potential
sustainable
production
crops,
clarifying
obstacles,
and
taking
effective
measures
in
advance
can
not
only
provide
residents
with
long-term
sufficient
nutritious
food
needs
but
also
help
to
promote
security
economic
benefits.
Previous
studies
on
this
aspect
have
mainly
focused
crops
paid
less
attention
cash
crops.
This
study
takes
Northwest
China
as
research
area,
which
is
a
typical
arid
semi-arid
region
most
prominent
contradiction
between
supply
demand.
We
analyzed
changing
characteristics
available
footprint,
total
footprint
over
time
from
systematically
analyze
for
development.
The
results
showed
that
regional
resource
consumption
2000–2020
significant
upward
trend
(p
<
0.01).
Similarly,
load
index
increased
period,
by
164.3%.
Water
resources
pressure
level
III
I,
there
no
further
development
potential.
At
same
time,
proportion
agricultural
was
forcibly
reduced
9.0%.
Fortunately,
crop
decreasing
0.01),
decrease
43.6%.
Among
them,
grain
decreased
45.4%
49.5%
respectively.
Although
reduced,
increasing
meet
consumer
increase
13.4%.
are
compressed,
amount
needed
significantly,
poses
challenges
According
results,
detailed
recommended
put
forward
available,
improving
utilization
efficiency
blue
green
water,
yield
level,
so
better
serve
global
security.
Foods,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(1), С. 150 - 150
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
With
the
expected
colonization
of
human
daily
life
by
artificial
intelligence,
including
in
industry
productivity,
deployment
Industry
4.0
(I4)
food
agriculture
(FAI)
is
to
revolutionize
and
galvanize
production
increase
efficiency
industry's
match,
tandem,
a
country's
gross
domestic
productivity.
Based
on
literature
review,
there
have
been
almost
no
direct
relationships
between
I4—Food-Agriculture
(I4FA)
Nexus
agroecosystem.
This
study
aimed
evaluate
state-of-the-art
I4FA
agroecosystem
discuss
challenges
sustainable
FAI
that
can
be
assisted
I4
technologies.
objective
was
fulfilled
(a)
reviewing
all
relevant
publications
(b)
drawing
conceptual
relationship
agroecosystem,
which
categorized
into
socio-economic
environmental
(SEE)
perspectives.
Four
points
are
highlighted
present
review.
First,
technology
projected
grow
agricultural
sectors
today
future.
Second,
output
may
benefit
from
considering
SEE
benefits.
Third,
implementing
challenging
journey
for
FAI,
especially
small
medium
enterprises
(SMEs).
Fourth,
environmental,
social,
governance
(ESG)
principles
help
manage
I4's
implementation
food.
The
advantages
include
social
benefits
like
increased
occupational
safety,
workers'
health,
quality,
security,
safety;
economic
benefits,
using
sensors
reduce
costs,
supply
chain;
(c)
reducing
chemical
leaching
fertilizer
use.
However,
more
studies
needed
address
adaptability,
trust,
privacy,
income
uncertainty,
SMEs
or
businesses
nations
with
lower
resources;
this
will
require
time
adaptation
make
transition
away
ecology.
For
ESG-sustainable,
could
an
answer
support
open-minded
dialogue
platform
ESG-minded
leaders
complement
agroecosystems
global
scale.
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
3, С. 100093 - 100093
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2021
The
seed
is
the
most
primary
requirement
of
agriculture.
Hence,
it
crucial
to
maintain
quality
seeds
through
nature-based
solutions
having
multiple
benefits.
Among
pre-sowing
techniques,
bio-priming
has
emerged
out
be
simple,
economical,
and
eco-friendly
delivery
system
beneficial
microorganisms
in
agroecosystem.
Therefore,
comprehension
regarding
applicability
restoring
soil
health,
improving
plant
nutrition,
maintaining
crop/seed
a
major
role
achieving
UN-Sustainable
Development
Goals
such
as
no
poverty,
zero
hunger,
good
health
well-being,
etc.
Our
efforts
minimize
nonrenewable
energy
sources
promote
use
microbial
resources
at
community
level
need
re-emphasized.
Identification
sustainability
indicators
like
enzymes,
growth
hormones,
organic
acids,
under
based
agroecosystems
imperative
for
utilizing
potential
microbes
best
manner.
This
review
highlights
pragmatic
technological
option
tripartite
goal
food-nutritional
security,
environmental
stewardship/quality,
agricultural
profitability
different
agroecosystems.
Land Degradation and Development,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
32(17), С. 4797 - 4816
Опубликована: Сен. 9, 2021
Abstract
Excessive
use
of
synthetic
chemicals
in
conventional
agriculture
largely
degraded
the
agroecosystems
that
constitute
approximately
40%
global
terrestrial
ecosystems.
Moreover,
changing
climate
resulted
a
substantial
loss
agricultural
productivity
(both
quantity
and
quality)
mainly
due
to
diverse
abiotic
biotic
stresses.
This
draws
public
awareness
about
depleting
natural
resources,
viz.,
soil,
land,
water
unsustainable
practices
equivalently
concerns
for
food‐related
animal
human
health
risks.
Modern
organic
has
shown
positive
impacts
terms
food/biomass
production,
resilience,
soil
health,
biodiversity,
nutritional
security,
good
quality
life;
is
prodigious
demand
nutrient‐rich
food
products.
In
ensuing
decade,
owing
principal
focus
aspects
or
benefits
agriculture,
this
review
explores
how
interventions
affect
value
yield
production
system;
enable
plants
adapt
adverse
futuristic
environmental
conditions,
address
security
challenges.
The
chronological
emergence,
current
status,
perceptions,
key
components
with
their
attached
are
inextricably
synthesized
herein.
Fostering
ethos
under
UN
Decade
on
Ecosystem
Restoration
(2021–2030)
highly
imperative
agroecosystem
restoration
its
sustainable
management.
multidimensional
paybacks
help
attaining
important
goals
targets
such
as
Bonn
Challenge
United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(UN‐SDGs)
by
year
2030.
Therefore,
invigorating
escalation
farming
concurrent
strategy
ecosystem
need
hour.
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
4, С. 100170 - 100170
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022
The
growing
movement
of
'regenerative
agriculture'
(RA)
claims
to
provide
a
way
adapt
changing
climate
by
regenerating
landscapes
while
meeting
the
social
and
economic
needs
farmers
their
communities.
Current
research
suggests
that
through
application
socio-ecological
(SES)
principles,
RA
can
build
farmer's
sense
ability
successfully
manage
land
for
range
outcomes
changes,
also
known
as
farming
self-efficacy.
Further,
it
is
argued
increasing
self-efficacy,
experience
improved
wellbeing.
Up
until
now,
role
self-efficacy
potential
wellbeing
pathway
has
only
been
examined
in
qualitative
literature.
We
address
this
gap
two-part
exploratory
study
Australian
graziers.
Firstly,
we
undertake
an
factor
analysis
(EFA)
identify
measure
principles.
then
use
examine
whether
mediates
effect
engaging
on
three
different
measures
subjective
(hedonic
wellbeing,
eudaimonic
evaluative
wellbeing).
Results
EFA
identified
two-factor
structure
These
were
labelled
"holistic
planning
monitoring"
"prioritising
landscape
regeneration".
Only
latter
was
strongly
associated
with
selfefficacy
Mediation
tested
separate
SEM
analyses.
Findings
showed
positive
relationship
between
regeneration"
all
significantly
mediated
Our
results
are
consistent
hypothesis
regenerative
agriculture
may
support
long-term
adaptation
climatic
variability
building