Iranian Journal of Microbiology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 16, 2023
Background
and
Objectives:
Since
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
began,
several
vaccines
have
been
manufactured
to
subside
it.
This
study
aimed
determine
prevalence
of
side
effects
after
injecting
common
COVID-19
available
in
Iran.
Materials
Methods:
cross-sectional
was
accomplished
on
Shahid
Beheshti
University
Medical
Sciences
(Tehran,
Iran)
employees
during
January
September
2022.
Eligible
participants
were
selected
based
simple
ran-
dom
method
interviewed
about
vaccine.
Results:
The
mean
age
656
38.03
±
9.53
years,
453
(69.1%)
female.
post-vac-
cination
higher
receiving
first
dose
(53.2%)
than
second
(35.9%)
third
(49.4%)
doses.
Across
all
three
vaccine
doses,
overall
proportion
following
AstraZeneca
others.
most
effect
myalgia
(41.9%),
followed
by
fever
(36.6%),
chills
(31.6%),
local
reactions
(27.0%),
headache
(25.5%),
sweating
(21.6%).
People
experienced
mainly
(23.3%)
(20.3%)
Additionally,
had
(37.2%),
(30.8%),
(29.2%),
(26.0%),
(24.4%)
Conclusion:
a
post-vaccination
adverse
Sputnik
V,
Pastocovac,
Sin-
opharm.
flu-like
syndrome
at
injection
site.
Furthermore,
people
rarely
life-threatening
effects.
Thus,
Iran
are
safe.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
36(5)
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2022
Abstract
After
about
2
years
since
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
(SARS‑CoV‑2),
first
infections
were
detected
in
Wuhan
city
of
China
December
2019,
which
was
followed
by
a
worldwide
pandemic
with
record
5.41
million
deaths.
Due
to
urgent
need
for
the
development
safe
and
effective
vaccine
disease
2019
(COVID‐19),
attempts
producing
efficient
vaccines
are
inexhaustibly
continuing.
According
report
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
on
COVID‐19
tracker
landscape,
there
149
candidates
all
over
world.
Inactivated
SARS‐CoV‐2
as
conventional
platform
consist
whole
virus
particles
grown
cell
culture
inactivated
chemicals.
Because
benefits
such
antigenic
similarity
real
virion
inducing
humoral
cellular
immune
responses
ease
transport
storage,
these
vaccines,
including
produced
Bharat
Biotech,
Sinopharm,
Sinovac,
use
at
large
scales.
In
this
study,
we
have
review
that
passing
their
phase
3
4
clinical
trials,
population
included
producers,
efficiency,
adverse
effects,
components
other
features.
BMC Infectious Diseases,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
22(1)
Опубликована: Май 18, 2022
Vaccination
is
a
key
intervention
to
prevent
COVID-19.
Many
vaccines
are
administered
globally,
yet
there
not
much
evidence
regarding
their
safety
and
adverse
effects.
Iran
also
faces
this
challenge,
especially
as
data
the
Sputnik
V
vaccine
sparse.
Therefore,
aim
of
study
determine
effects
most
commonly
used
in
Iran.Using
retrospective
cohort
design,
6600
subjects
aged
18
years
or
older
who
had
received
two
doses
any
three
COVID-19
(Sinopharm,
AstraZeneca,
V)
were
selected
using
random
sampling
method
between
March
August
2021.
Subjects
asked
about
by
trained
interviewers
via
telephone
interview.
Vaccine-related
individuals
during
first
72
h
subsequently
following
both
determined.
The
demographic
variables,
type
vaccine,
effects,
history
previous
infection
with
collected.
Descriptive
statistics
(mean,
standard
deviation)
analytical
(Chi-squared
Wilcoxon
tests)
performed
at
95%
significance
level
STATA
software
version
15
(STATA
Corp,
College
Station,
TX,
USA).From
participants,
4775
responded
(response
rate
=
72.3%).
Of
1460
(30.6%)
AstraZeneca
1564
(32.8%)
Sinopharm
1751
(36.7%)
vaccine.
2653
participants
(55.56%)
reported
after
dose
1704
(35.7%)
second
dose.
caused
1449
(82.7%)
recipients
reporting
symptoms
dose,
compared
1030
(70.5%)
for
only
585
(37.4%)
common
fatigue
(28.37%),
chill/fever
(26.86%),
skeletal
pain
(22.38%).
These
same
although
prevalence
was
lower.In
study,
we
demonstrate
that
has
highest
followed
vaccines.
safe
no
reports
serious
Vaccines,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10(4), С. 488 - 488
Опубликована: Март 22, 2022
COVID-19
remains
a
deadly
disease
that
poses
serious
threat
to
humanity.
vaccines
protect
the
public
and
limit
viral
spread.
However,
acceptance
is
significantly
dependent
on
efficacy
side
effects
(SEs)
of
vaccinations
being
produced.
Four
important
mechanisms
have
been
examined
for
vaccines:
DNA-based,
mRNA-based,
protein-based,
inactivated
viruses.
Vaccination
safety
research
was
formerly
limited
manufacturer-sponsored
studies,
but
numerous
additional
cross-sectional
survey-based
studies
conducted
globally
contributed
generation
vaccine-related
data
reports.
Twenty-seven
twenty-four
case
reports
published-up
till
2021
were
overviewed
presentation
SEs
their
severity.
Injection
site
pain
remained
most
dominant
localized
SE,
while
headache
fatigue
prevalent
systemic
SEs.
Most
reported
all
safe,
with
very
little
or
no
adverse
effects,
nature
be
more
persistent
in
DNA-
mRNA-based
vaccines,
associated
longer-duration
Overall,
found
women
youngsters.
Case
reactions
also
documented,
there
still
need
find
out
pathological
linkage
vaccination.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10
Опубликована: Май 16, 2022
Healthcare
workers
were
prioritized
in
vaccination
campaigns
globally
because
they
are
exposed
to
the
highest
risk
of
contamination
by
SARS-CoV-2.
This
study
evaluated
self-reported
post-vaccination
side
effects
inactivated
(BBIBP-CorV
and
CoronaVac)
adenoviral
vector-based
(AZD1222,
Gam-COVID-Vac
Ad26.COV2.S)
vaccines
among
Algerian
healthcare
using
a
validated
questionnaire.
The
final
analysis
included
721
workers,
with
predominance
females
(59.1%)
younger
individuals
20–30
years
old
(39.4%).
Less
than
half
(49.1%)
respondents
reported
at
least
one
local
effect,
while
53.8%
systemic
effect.
These
more
prevalent
viral
vector
vaccinees
virus
vaccinees.
most
common
injection
site
pain
(39%)
arm
(25.4%),
fatigue
(34.4%),
fever
(28.4%),
headache
(24.8%)
myalgia
(22.7%)
effects.
appeared
earlier
recipients
generally
lasted
for
2
3
days
two
vaccinated
groups.
factors
associated
higher
prevalence
female
gender,
allergic
individuals,
regular
medication,
those
who
contracted
COVID-19
disease
received
doses
both
viral-based
Despite
recipients,
groups
equally
effective
preventing
symptomatic
infections,
no
life-threatening
either
vaccine
group.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10
Опубликована: Март 14, 2022
A
few
studies
examined
the
comparative
side
effects
of
Coronavirus
Disease-19
(COVID-19)
vaccines.
We
compared
extension
and
severity
self-reported
seven
COVID-19
vaccines
[BNT162b2
(Pfizer-BioNTech),
ChAdOx1
(AstraZeneca),
mRNA-1273
(Moderna),
CoronaVac
(Sinovac
Life
Sciences),
Gam-COVID-Vac
(Gamaleya's
Sputnik
V),
Ad5-nCoV
(CanSinoBIO),
Ad26.CoV2.S
(Johnson
&
Johnson/Janssen)]
in
Mexican
population.
also
evaluated
association
type
vaccine,
sex,
age,
comorbidity,
history
allergies
to
extent
effects.
This
was
a
cross-sectional
study
carried
out
online
between
August
12
September
3,
2021
Mexico.
The
first
inclusion
criterion
receive
vaccine
second,
being
at
least
18
years
old.
survey
link
distributed
via
multiple
social
media
platforms.
questioned
about
symptoms
based
on
short-term
reported
literature.
Side
effect
classified
as
local,
systemic,
or
both.
asked
need
take
medicine,
stop
activities/miss
work,
seek
medical
attention.
Then,
index
constructed
responses.
Descriptive
stepwise
multivariate
logistic
ordinal
regression
analyses
were
used
calculate
odds
ratio
(OR)
95%
CI
for
each
outcome
adjusted
by
potential
confounders.
mean
age
38.9
±
11.0
(
n
=
4,024).
Prevalence
one
varied
number
doses.
At
dose
1,
with
highest
rate
(85%)
followed
(80%).
Both
associated
greater
(adjusted
OR
2.53,
2.16,
2.96
2.41,
1.76,
3.29,
respectively)
4.32,
3.73,
5.00
3.00,
2.28,
3.94,
respectively).
Young
(<50
years),
female
severity,
independent
2,
(88%)
only
2.88,
1.59,
5.21)
3.14,
1.82,
5.43).
Continuous
are
necessary
acknowledge
more
post-vaccine
different
populations.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
13
Опубликована: Авг. 9, 2022
We
systematically
reviewed
and
summarized
studies
focusing
on
Bharat
Biotech's
Whole
Virion
Inactivated
Corona
Virus
Antigen
BBV152
(Covaxin),
which
is
India's
indigenous
response
to
fighting
the
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic.
Studies
were
searched
for
data
efficacy,
immunogenicity,
safety
profile
of
BBV152.
All
relevant
published
up
March
22,
2022,
screened
from
major
databases,
25
eventually
inducted
into
systematic
review.
The
focused
virus
antigen
(6
μg)
adjuvanted
with
aluminium
hydroxide
gel
and/or
Imidazo
quinolin
gallamide
(IMDG),
aTLR7/8
agonist.
Pre-clinical,
phase
I,
II
clinical
trials
showed
appreciable
immunogenicity.
Both
neutralizing
binding
antibody
titers
significant
T
cell
responses
Th1-biased.
Phase
III
6
μg
+Algel-IMDG
formulation
a
93.4%
efficacy
against
severe
COVID-19.
Data
revealed
an
acceptable
mostly
mild-moderate
local
systemic
adverse
events.
No
serious
events
or
fatalities
seen,
most
reported
milder
lesser
Covaxin
when
compared
other
vaccines,
especially
Oxford-Astra
Zeneca's
AZD1222
(Covishield).
immunogenicity
performance
Covaxin,
provided
protection
only
after
second
dose,
was
mediocre
it
consistently
surpassed
by
Covishield.
One
study
adjusted
effectiveness
symptomatic
infection
be
just
50%
at
2
weeks
dose.
Nonetheless,
results
seen
in
previously
infected
individuals
administered
both
doses.
There
some
evidence
coverage
Alpha,
Beta,
Delta
variants.
However,
neither
nor
Covishield
sufficient
Omicron
variant.
Two
super-additive
mixing
Further
exploration
heterologous
prime-boost
vaccination
combination
inactivated
vaccine
adenoviral
vector-based
tackling
future
variants
may
beneficial.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(1)
Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2022
Abstract
Sputnik-V
(Gam-COVID-Vac)
is
a
heterologous,
recombinant
adenoviral
(rAdv)
vector-based,
COVID-19
vaccine
now
used
in
>
70
countries.
Yet
there
shortage
of
data
on
this
vaccine's
performance
diverse
populations.
Here,
we
performed
prospective
cohort
study
to
assess
the
reactogenicity
and
immunologic
outcomes
vaccination
Kazakhstan.
COVID-19-free
participants
(n
=
82
at
baseline)
were
followed
day
21
after
dose
1
(rAd5)
2
(rAd26).
Self-reported
local
systemic
adverse
events
captured
using
questionnaires.
Blood
nasopharyngeal
swabs
collected
perform
SARS-CoV-2
diagnostic
assays.
We
observed
that
most
reported
mild-to-moderate
injection
site
or
reactions,
no
severe
potentially
life-threatening
conditions
reported,
appeared
be
more
reactogenic
than
2.
The
seroconversion
rate
was
97%
post-dose
1,
remaining
same
proportion
with
detectable
virus
neutralization
83%
increasing
98%
2,
largest
relative
increase
without
prior
exposure.
Dose
boosted
nasal
S-IgG
S-IgA,
while
boosting
effect
mucosal
S-IgG,
but
not
only
subjects
COVID-19.
Systemically,
reduced
serum
levels
growth
regulated
oncogene
(GRO),
which
correlated
an
elevation
blood
platelet
count.
Overall,
elicited
both
immunity,
immune
minimal.
Thus,
adjustments
current
dosing
regimen
are
necessary
optimize
immunization
efficacy
cost-effectiveness.
While
similar
other
vaccines,
induced
alterations
GRO/platelet
axis
warrant
investigation
vaccine’s
effects
immunology.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
20(3), С. e0277585 - e0277585
Опубликована: Март 12, 2025
Background
COVID-19
still
poses
a
major
public
health
challenge
worldwide
and
vaccination
remains
one
of
the
interventions
to
control
disease.
Different
types
vaccines
approved
by
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
are
currently
in
use
across
world
protect
against
This
study
assessed
prevalence
pattern
adverse
events
following
immunization
(AEFI)
after
receiving
vaccine
(the
Oxford-AstraZeneca
vaccine)
among
adult
population
Sokoto
metropolis,
North-west,
Nigeria.
Methods
We
conducted
cross-sectional
230
adults
metropolis
who
received
vaccines.
Data
was
collected
using
structured
questionnaire
administered
via
personal
phone
calls
respondents
were
selected
systematic
sampling
technique.
For
data
analysis,
IBM
SPSS
version
25.0
used.
Results
The
majority
participants
[183
(79.7%)]
experienced
AEFI.
most
common
body
weakness
[157
(85%)],
fever
[111
(60.3%)]
headache
[103
(56%)].
Up
half
that
AEFI
said
it
occurred
within
minutes
few
hours,
whereas
75
(40.8%)
2-3
days.
66.3%
reactions
mild
lasted
between
hours
(37.5%)
day
(31.5%);
however,
15.2%
had
severe
which
22.7%
admitted
facility.
development
linked
presence
an
underlying
medical
condition
(p
=
0.001),
previous
history
0.017),
drug
reaction
0.005).
Conclusion
reported
with
vaccine;
weakness,
fever,
being
AEFIs.
History
as
well
predictors
vaccination.
Service
providers
at
each
point
should
always
take
time
explain
recipients
possible;
they
reassure
them
ARs
resolve