The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic

The Lancet, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 400(10359), С. 1224 - 1280

Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2022

Язык: Английский

---

Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Perspectives on Psychological Science, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 17(4), С. 915 - 936

Опубликована: Янв. 19, 2022

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this article provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental-health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support mental health during pandemic beyond.

Язык: Английский

---

How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects

Nature Medicine, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 28(10), С. 2027 - 2037

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2022

Язык: Английский

---

Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts

BMJ, Год журнала: 2023, Номер unknown, С. e074224 - e074224

Опубликована: Март 8, 2023

To synthesise results of mental health outcomes in cohorts before and during the covid-19 pandemic.Systematic review.Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Web Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, medRxiv, Open Science Framework Preprints.Studies comparing general health, anxiety symptoms, or depression symptoms assessed from 1 January 2020 later with collected 2018 to 31 December 2019 any population, comprising ≥90% same participants pandemic using statistical methods account for missing data. Restricted maximum likelihood random effects meta-analyses (worse representing positive change) were performed. Risk bias was an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist Prevalence Studies.As 11 April 2022, 94 411 unique titles abstracts including 137 studies 134 reviewed. Most high income (n=105, 77%) upper middle (n=28, 20%) countries. Among population studies, no changes found (standardised mean difference (SMD)change 0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.00 0.22) (0.05, -0.04 0.13), but worsened minimally (0.12, 0.01 0.24). women female participants, (0.22, 0.08 0.35), (0.20, 0.12 0.29), 0.05 0.40) by minimal small amounts. In 27 other analyses across outcome domains among subgroups than five suggested that amounts, two improvements. No subgroup experienced all domains. three data March late 2020, unchanged pre-covid-19 levels at both assessments increased initially then returned levels. Substantial heterogeneity risk present analyses.High many substantial suggest caution interpreting results. Nonetheless, most symptom change estimates close zero not statistically significant, significant magnitudes. Small negative occurred The authors will update this systematic review as more evidence accrues, study posted online (https://www.depressd.ca/covid-19-mental-health).PROSPERO CRD42020179703.

Язык: Английский

---

Depression and anxiety during COVID-19

The Lancet, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 399(10324), С. 518 - 518

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2022

Язык: Английский

---

Changes in Depression and Anxiety Among Children and Adolescents From Before to During the COVID-19 Pandemic

JAMA Pediatrics, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 177(6), С. 567 - 567

Опубликована: Май 1, 2023

There is a growing body of high-quality cohort-based research that has examined changes in child and adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic vs before pandemic. Some studies have found depression anxiety symptoms increased, while others these to remained stable or decreased.

Язык: Английский

---

The global evolution of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Journal of Affective Disorders, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 315, С. 70 - 95

Опубликована: Июль 14, 2022

Язык: Английский

---

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Control Measures on the Mental Health of the General Population

Annals of Internal Medicine, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 175(11), С. 1560 - 1571

Опубликована: Окт. 17, 2022

Background: To what extent the COVID-19 pandemic and its containment measures influenced mental health in general population is still unclear. Purpose: assess trajectory of symptoms during first year examine dose–response relations with characteristics containment. Data Sources: Relevant articles were identified from living evidence database Open Access Project, which indexes COVID-19–related publications MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase Ovid, PsycInfo. Preprint not considered. Study Selection: Longitudinal studies that reported data on population's using validated scales published before 31 March 2021 eligible. Extraction: An international crowd 109 trained reviewers screened references extracted study characteristics, participant symptom scores at each timepoint. also included for following country-specific variables: days since case SARS-CoV-2 infection, stringency governmental measures, cumulative numbers cases deaths. Synthesis: In a total 43 (331 628 participants), changes psychological distress, sleep disturbances, well-being varied substantially across studies. On average, depression anxiety worsened 2 months (standardized mean difference 60 days, −0.39 [95% credible interval, −0.76 to −0.03]); thereafter, trajectories heterogeneous. There was linear association worsening increasing infection measures. Gender, age, country, deprivation, inequalities, risk bias, design did modify these associations. Limitations: The certainty low because high bias large amount heterogeneity. Stringency surges strongly correlated changed over time. observed associations should be interpreted as causal relationships. Conclusion: Although an initial increase average between higher more stringent found, after pandemic. This suggests different populations responded differently stress generated by Primary Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation. (PROSPERO: CRD42020180049)

Язык: Английский

---

Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Опубликована: Фев. 19, 2021

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this paper provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support during pandemic beyond.

Язык: Английский

---

Scoping review: longitudinal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent mental health

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 33(5), С. 1257 - 1312

Опубликована: Апрель 21, 2023

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures have massively changed the daily lives of billions children adolescents worldwide. To investigate global longitudinal effects on various mental health outcomes over a period 1.5 years, we conducted scoping review in accordance with guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses extension Scoping (PRISMA-ScR). We included peer-reviewed articles from PubMed, Web Science, APA PsycInfo that were published between December 2019 2021, followed or repeated cross-sectional design, quantitatively assessed clinical questionnaires effect related stressor indicators community samples adolescents. results our qualitative analysis 69 studies indicate general trend less psychological well-being more problems, such as heightened stress, depressive anxiety symptoms during pandemic. Data suggest both protection measure intensity infection dynamics positively severity psychopathology. most reported influencing factors age, gender, socio-economic status, previous state physical health, self-regulation abilities, parental parenting quality, family functioning, social support, isolation loneliness, health-related worries, consistent routines structure. Our demonstrate worldwide experienced problems due to They call improved access child adolescent care prioritisation welfare political decision making.

Язык: Английский

---