A global meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and stress before and during COVID-19. DOI
Hojjat Daniali, Monica Martinussen, Magne Arve Flaten

et al.

Health Psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 42(2), P. 124 - 138

Published: Feb. 1, 2023

This meta-analysis compared negative emotions (NEs) as depression, anxiety, and stress, from before the pandemic to during pandemic.A total of 59 studies (19 before, 37 during-pandemic, 3 that included both) using Depression, Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) were included. A random effects model estimated means NEs pandemic.Studies 47 countries involving 193,337 participants Globally, increased pandemic, depression had largest elevation. In Asia, stress elevated, whereas in Europe, only increased, America, no differences between observed. The later time phase was associated with lower globally, anxiety Europe. Being younger more being older higher Asia. Students all three aspects Europe general population. COVID-19 infection rate During females reported levels males, most pronounced Europe.NEs student populations, Asians having highest elevations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, rights reserved).

Language: Английский

The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic DOI
Jeffrey D. Sachs, Salim S. Abdool Karim, Lara B. Aknin

et al.

The Lancet, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 400(10359), P. 1224 - 1280

Published: Sept. 14, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

557
Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward DOI Creative Commons
Lara B. Aknin, Jan‐Emmanuel De Neve, Elizabeth W. Dunn

et al.

Perspectives on Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(4), P. 915 - 936

Published: Jan. 19, 2022

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this article provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental-health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support mental health during pandemic beyond.

Language: Английский

Citations

378
How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects DOI Open Access
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Michael E. Benros,

Robyn S. Klein

et al.

Nature Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 28(10), P. 2027 - 2037

Published: Oct. 1, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

313
Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts DOI Creative Commons
Ying Sun, Yin Wu, Suiqiong Fan

et al.

BMJ, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. e074224 - e074224

Published: March 8, 2023

To synthesise results of mental health outcomes in cohorts before and during the covid-19 pandemic.Systematic review.Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Web Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, medRxiv, Open Science Framework Preprints.Studies comparing general health, anxiety symptoms, or depression symptoms assessed from 1 January 2020 later with collected 2018 to 31 December 2019 any population, comprising ≥90% same participants pandemic using statistical methods account for missing data. Restricted maximum likelihood random effects meta-analyses (worse representing positive change) were performed. Risk bias was an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist Prevalence Studies.As 11 April 2022, 94 411 unique titles abstracts including 137 studies 134 reviewed. Most high income (n=105, 77%) upper middle (n=28, 20%) countries. Among population studies, no changes found (standardised mean difference (SMD)change 0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.00 0.22) (0.05, -0.04 0.13), but worsened minimally (0.12, 0.01 0.24). women female participants, (0.22, 0.08 0.35), (0.20, 0.12 0.29), 0.05 0.40) by minimal small amounts. In 27 other analyses across outcome domains among subgroups than five suggested that amounts, two improvements. No subgroup experienced all domains. three data March late 2020, unchanged pre-covid-19 levels at both assessments increased initially then returned levels. Substantial heterogeneity risk present analyses.High many substantial suggest caution interpreting results. Nonetheless, most symptom change estimates close zero not statistically significant, significant magnitudes. Small negative occurred The authors will update this systematic review as more evidence accrues, study posted online (https://www.depressd.ca/covid-19-mental-health).PROSPERO CRD42020179703.

Language: Английский

Citations

194
Depression and anxiety during COVID-19 DOI Open Access
Michael Daly, Eric Robinson

The Lancet, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 399(10324), P. 518 - 518

Published: Feb. 1, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

179
Changes in Depression and Anxiety Among Children and Adolescents From Before to During the COVID-19 Pandemic DOI
Sheri Madigan, Nicole Racine, Tracy Vaillancourt

et al.

JAMA Pediatrics, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 177(6), P. 567 - 567

Published: May 1, 2023

There is a growing body of high-quality cohort-based research that has examined changes in child and adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic vs before pandemic. Some studies have found depression anxiety symptoms increased, while others these to remained stable or decreased.

Language: Английский

Citations

166
The global evolution of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies DOI
Jude Mary Cénat, Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moshirian Farahi, Rose Darly Dalexis

et al.

Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 315, P. 70 - 95

Published: July 14, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

141
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Control Measures on the Mental Health of the General Population DOI
Georgia Salanti, Natalie Peter, Thomy Tonia

et al.

Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 175(11), P. 1560 - 1571

Published: Oct. 17, 2022

Background: To what extent the COVID-19 pandemic and its containment measures influenced mental health in general population is still unclear. Purpose: assess trajectory of symptoms during first year examine dose–response relations with characteristics containment. Data Sources: Relevant articles were identified from living evidence database Open Access Project, which indexes COVID-19–related publications MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase Ovid, PsycInfo. Preprint not considered. Study Selection: Longitudinal studies that reported data on population's using validated scales published before 31 March 2021 eligible. Extraction: An international crowd 109 trained reviewers screened references extracted study characteristics, participant symptom scores at each timepoint. also included for following country-specific variables: days since case SARS-CoV-2 infection, stringency governmental measures, cumulative numbers cases deaths. Synthesis: In a total 43 (331 628 participants), changes psychological distress, sleep disturbances, well-being varied substantially across studies. On average, depression anxiety worsened 2 months (standardized mean difference 60 days, −0.39 [95% credible interval, −0.76 to −0.03]); thereafter, trajectories heterogeneous. There was linear association worsening increasing infection measures. Gender, age, country, deprivation, inequalities, risk bias, design did modify these associations. Limitations: The certainty low because high bias large amount heterogeneity. Stringency surges strongly correlated changed over time. observed associations should be interpreted as causal relationships. Conclusion: Although an initial increase average between higher more stringent found, after pandemic. This suggests different populations responded differently stress generated by Primary Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation. (PROSPERO: CRD42020180049)

Language: Английский

Citations

128
Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward DOI
Lara B. Aknin,

Jan Emmanuel De Neve,

Elizabeth W. Dunn

et al.

Published: Feb. 19, 2021

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this paper provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support during pandemic beyond.

Language: Английский

Citations

123
Scoping review: longitudinal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent mental health DOI Creative Commons
Kristin Rodney-Wolf, Julian Schmitz

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 33(5), P. 1257 - 1312

Published: April 21, 2023

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures have massively changed the daily lives of billions children adolescents worldwide. To investigate global longitudinal effects on various mental health outcomes over a period 1.5 years, we conducted scoping review in accordance with guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses extension Scoping (PRISMA-ScR). We included peer-reviewed articles from PubMed, Web Science, APA PsycInfo that were published between December 2019 2021, followed or repeated cross-sectional design, quantitatively assessed clinical questionnaires effect related stressor indicators community samples adolescents. results our qualitative analysis 69 studies indicate general trend less psychological well-being more problems, such as heightened stress, depressive anxiety symptoms during pandemic. Data suggest both protection measure intensity infection dynamics positively severity psychopathology. most reported influencing factors age, gender, socio-economic status, previous state physical health, self-regulation abilities, parental parenting quality, family functioning, social support, isolation loneliness, health-related worries, consistent routines structure. Our demonstrate worldwide experienced problems due to They call improved access child adolescent care prioritisation welfare political decision making.

Language: Английский

Citations

114