Systematic review of empiric studies on lockdowns, workplace closures, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions in non-healthcare workplaces during the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic: benefits and selected unintended consequences DOI Creative Commons
Faruque Ahmed,

Livvy Shafer,

Pallavi Malla

и другие.

BMC Public Health, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(1)

Опубликована: Март 22, 2024

Abstract Background We conducted a systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions within non-healthcare workplaces and community-level workplace closures lockdowns on COVID-19 morbidity mortality, selected mental disorders, employment outcomes in workers or general population. Methods The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials non-randomized studies interventions. exclusion modeling studies. Electronic searches were using MEDLINE, Embase, other databases from January 1, 2020, through May 11, 2021. Risk bias was assessed Bias Non-Randomized Studies Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis sign tests performed. Results A total 60 observational met criteria. There 40 outcomes, 15 anxiety depression symptoms, five unemployment labor force participation. paucity physical distancing, barriers, symptom temperature screening workplaces. test indicated that lockdown reduced incidence case growth rate (23 studies, p < 0.001), reproduction number (11 mortality death (seven 0.05) Lockdown did not have any effect symptoms (pooled standardized mean difference = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.06, 0.02). had small increasing 0.16, 0.10, 0.21), but publication could account for observed effect. increased 4.48 percentage points, 1.79, 7.17) decreased participation -2.46 -3.16, -1.77). risk most moderate serious. serious critical. Conclusions Empiric impact COVID-19, it notable unwanted effects. is pronounced still-open It important countries implement future pandemics consider strategies mitigate these unintended consequences. Systematic registration PROSPERO # CRD42020182660.

Язык: Английский

A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 DOI Open Access
Eric Robinson, Angelina R. Sutin, Michael Daly

и другие.

Journal of Affective Disorders, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 296, С. 567 - 576

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

887

The impact of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on stress resilience and mental health: A critical review across waves DOI Creative Commons
Mirko Manchia,

Anouk W. Gathier,

Hale Yapıcı Eser

и другие.

European Neuropsychopharmacology, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 55, С. 22 - 83

Опубликована: Окт. 29, 2021

The global public health crisis caused by COVID-19 has lasted longer than many of us would have hoped and expected. With its high uncertainty limited control, the pandemic undoubtedly asked a lot from all us. One important central question is: how resilient we proved in face unprecedented prolonged coronavirus pandemic? There is vast rapidly growing literature that examined impact on mental both shorter (2020) (2021) term. This not only concerns pandemic-related effects resilience general population, but also challenged stress outcomes across more specific vulnerable population groups: patients with psychiatric disorder, diagnosed patients, care workers, children adolescents, pregnant women, elderly people. It challenging to keep up date with, interpret, this increasing scientific literature. In review, provide critical overview impacted human been shaped dominated wealth data which are, however, always highest quality heavily depend online self-report surveys. Nevertheless, it appears proven surprisingly over time, fast recovery measures. Still, groups such as adolescents personnel severely do exist. Large interindividual differences exist, for future pandemics there clear need comprehensively integratively assess start personalized help interventions tailored needs groups.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

351

From Resilience to Burnout in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Emergency: The Role of the Ability to Tolerate Uncertainty DOI Creative Commons
Michela Di Trani, Rachele Mariani,

Rosa Ferri

и другие.

Frontiers in Psychology, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 12

Опубликована: Апрель 16, 2021

The COVID-19 outbreak has placed extraordinary demands upon healthcare systems worldwide. Italy's hospitals have been among the most severely overwhelmed, and as a result, Italian workers' (HCWs) well-being at risk. aim of this study is to explore relationships between dimensions burnout various psychological features workers during emergency. A group 267 HCWs from hospital in Lazio Region completed self-administered questionnaires online through Google Forms, including Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Resilience Scale, Intolerance Uncertainty Scale Short Form (IU). Cluster analysis highlighted two opposite risk profiles: low high-risk burnout. had lower resilience greater difficulties tolerating uncertainty than low-burnout group. set general linear models confirmed that both IU subscales, prospective inhibition, moderated relationship (specifically depersonalization dimension). In conclusion, results showed individual levels one's ability tolerate significant factors determining impact emergency on HCWs. use emotional strategies allow individuals stay critical situation without need control it appears protect against these circumstances.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

116

Psychological impact of the quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic on the general European adult population: a systematic review of the evidence DOI Creative Commons
Maurizio Bonati, Rita Campi, Giulia Segre

и другие.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 31

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022

Abstract Aims Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) different countries implemented quarantine measures limit spread of virus. Many studies analysed mental health consequences restrictive confinement, some which focused their attention on specific populations. The general public's also requires significant attention, however. This study aimed evaluate effects COVID-19 population's in European countries. Risk and protective factors associated with psychological symptoms were analysed. Methods A systematic search was conducted four electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus Google Scholar). Studies published up until 20th April 2021, following eligibility criteria selected for this review. One thousand three hundred thirty-five (1335) screened, 105 included. Via network analysis, current investigated pathways that underlie possible risk outcomes. Results Anxiety, depression, distress post-traumatic are frequently experienced during often changes sleeping eating habits. Some socio-demographic COVID-19-related variables found be an individual's wellbeing. In particular, being female, young, having a low income, unemployed COVID-19-like or chronic disorders, most common symptoms. Conclusions pandemic represented unprecedented threat globally. order prevent morbidity offer support tailored short-, medium- long-term negative outcomes, it is essential identify direct indirect psychosocial lockdown measures, especially certain vulnerable groups. addition reduce curve viral transmission, policy makers should urgently take into consideration provisions alleviate hazards health.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

107

Mental Health in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic DOI Creative Commons
Janine Wirkner, Hanna Christiansen, Christine Knaevelsrud

и другие.

European Psychologist, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 26(4), С. 310 - 322

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2021

Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most serious health and economic crises 21st century. From a psychological point view, its consequences can be conceptualized as multidimensional potentially toxic stressor for mental in general population. This selective literature review provides an overview longitudinal studies published until June 2021 that have investigated impact on European Risk protective factors identified are summarized. Forty-two met inclusion search criteria ( COVID-19, health, longitudinal, Europe) PubMed, PsycInfo, Web Science databases indicate differential effects distress, depression, anxiety, depending samples methods used. Age-specific (e.g., young age), social female, ethnical minority, loneliness), well physical health-related pre-pandemic illness) were risk poor health. to several such support, higher cognitive ability, resilience, self-efficacy. Increasing evidence supports assumption being with some populations appearing more vulnerable than others, although inconsistencies arise. Whether will lead increase prevalence disorders open question. Further high-quality multi-national meta-analyses needed draw complete picture

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

56

One year on: What we have learned about the psychological effects of COVID-19 social restrictions: A meta-analysis DOI Open Access
Laura Knox, Gery C. Karantzas, Daniel Romano

и другие.

Current Opinion in Psychology, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 46, С. 101315 - 101315

Опубликована: Март 10, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

54

Increased antidepressant use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy, 2015–2020 DOI
Laura Pazzagli, Johan Reutfors,

Ejlli Lucian

и другие.

Psychiatry Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 315, С. 114704 - 114704

Опубликована: Июнь 30, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

32

Comparison of Mental Health Symptoms Prior to and During COVID-19: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 134 Cohorts DOI Creative Commons
Ying Sun, Yin Wu, Suiqiong Fan

и другие.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Год журнала: 2021, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Май 11, 2021

ABSTRACT Objectives The rapid pace, high volume, and limited quality of mental health evidence that has been generated during COVID-19 poses a barrier to understanding outcomes. We sought summarize results from studies compared outcomes assessed prior in the same cohort general population other groups for which data have reported. Design Living systematic review. Data Sources MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE Web Science Core Collection: Citation Indexes, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, medRxiv (preprints), Open Framework Preprints (preprint server aggregator). Eligibility criteria selecting For this report, we included health, anxiety symptoms, or depression January 1, 2020 later, collected between 2018 December 31, 2019. Any was eligible. required ≥ 90% participants pre-COVID-19 be use statistical methods address missing data. with continuous at least two an outcome domain, conducted restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses. Worse are reported as positive. Risk bias using adapted version Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist Prevalence Studies. Results As April 11, 2022, had reviewed 94,411 unique titles abstracts identified 137 eligible 134 cohorts. Almost all were high-income (105, 77%) upper-middle income (28, 20%) countries. Among adult studies, did not find changes (standardized mean difference change [SMD = 0.11, 95% CI -0.00 0.22) symptoms (SMD 0.05, -0.04 0.13), but worsened minimally 0.12, 0.01 0.24). women females, by minimal small amounts 0.22, 0.08 0.35), 0.20, 0.12 0.29), 0.05 0.40). Of 27 analyses across domains, among subgroups than 5 suggested symptom worsening, 2 improvements. No subgroup experienced statistically significant domains. In 3 March later 2020, either unchanged both time points increased initially then returned levels. Heterogeneity measured I statistic (e.g., > 80%) most analyses, there concerning risk studies. Conclusions High many substantial heterogeneity suggest point estimates should interpreted cautiously. Nonetheless, consistency close zero significant, magnitudes. There were, however, negative females It is possible gaps allowed identification some vulnerable groups. Continued updating needed accrues. Funding: Canadian Institutes Health Research (CMS-171703; MS1-173070; GA4-177758; WI2-179944); McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative Infection Immunity Emergency Fund (R2-42). Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020179703); registered on 17, 2020.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

35

The effect of different degrees of lockdown and self-identified gender on anxiety, depression and suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the international COMET-G study. DOI
Konstantinos Ν. Fountoulakis, Grigorios N. Karakatsoulis, Seri Abraham

и другие.

Psychiatry Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 315, С. 114702 - 114702

Опубликована: Июль 1, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

27

Depression, anxiety and quality of life of hemodialysis patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic DOI Creative Commons
Els Nadort, Nadine Rijkers, Robbert W. Schouten

и другие.

Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 158, С. 110917 - 110917

Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2022

To investigate the impact of coronavirus pandemic on mental health in hemodialysis patients, we assessed depression, anxiety and quality life with valid measures before after start pandemic. Data were used from 121 patients ongoing prospective multicenter DIVERS-II study. COVID-19 related stress was measured Perceived Stress Scale – 10, depression Beck Depression Inventory second edition (BDI-II)), Anxiety (BAI) Short Form 12 (SF-12). Scores during first wave Netherlands compared to data prior linear mixed models. No significant differences found BDI-II, BAI SF-12 scores between During wave, 33% participants reported 37%. These had higher levels (mean difference (MD) 4.7 (95%CI 1.5; 8.0), p = 0.005) BDI-II (MD 4.9 0.7; 9.0), 0.021) lower component summary -5.3 -9.0, −1.6), 0.006) than who did not experienced stress. already present The does seem influence patients. However, a substantial subgroup pre-existent problems may be more susceptible experience

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

25