Animal Behavior and Cognition,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
10(2), С. 163 - 168
Опубликована: Май 1, 2023
We
respond
to
the
commentary
by
Tennie
and
Call
(2023)
on
article
Koops
et
al.
(2022)
in
Nature
Human
Behaviour
titled
‘Field
experiments
find
no
evidence
that
chimpanzee
nut
cracking
can
be
independently
innovated.’
showed
is
not
a
so-called
‘latent
solution.’
Chimpanzees
(Pan
troglodytes
verus)
Nimba
Mountains
(Guinea)
did
crack
nuts
when
presented
with
stones
ecologically
valid
field
experiments.
In
their
Commentary,
argued
were
inconclusive
for
two
reasons:
1)
chimpanzees
motivated
treat
as
food,
2)
within
appropriate
‘sensitive
learning
period.’
our
response,
we
argue
incorrectly
use
term
‘motivation’
mean
‘willingness
eat
nut’,
which
requires
existing
knowledge
of
edibility
nuts.
also
point
out
it
unnatural
uninformative
inject
honey
motivate
them,
suggested
(2023).
Finally,
highlight
tested
appropriately
aged
subjects
(N=32
immatures).
Moreover,
there
suggest
strictly
sensitive
period
restricted
juvenility.
emphasize
need
researchers
doing
captivity
visit
study
species
wild,
involved
efforts
design
captivity.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 27, 2024
Abstract
Cumulative
technological
culture
is
defined
as
the
increase
in
efficiency
and
complexity
of
tools
techniques
over
generations.
While
role
social
cognitive
skills
cultural
transmission
has
been
long
acknowledged,
recent
accounts
have
emphasized
that
non-social
such
technical
reasoning,
a
form
causal
reasoning
aimed
at
understanding
physical
world,
are
also
work
during
content.
Here
we
contribute
to
this
double
process
approach
by
reporting
an
fMRI
study
about
neurocognitive
origins
learning.
Participants
were
shown
videos
depicting
tool-making
episodes
three
social-learning
conditions:
Reverse
engineering,
Observation
Teaching.
Our
results
showed
technical-reasoning
network,
centred
around
Area
PF
left
inferior
parietal
cortex,
was
preferentially
activated
when
watching
episodes.
Additionally,
teaching
component
related
activation
right
middle
temporal
gyrus.
We
propose
heart
our
cognition
improve
learner’s
helping
them
concentrate
on
important
parts
technology.
Thus,
both
social-cognitive
may
play
key
evolution
technologies.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
121(48)
Опубликована: Ноя. 18, 2024
Although
the
theoretical
foundations
of
modern
field
cultural
evolution
have
been
in
place
for
over
50
y,
laboratory
experiments
specifically
designed
to
test
evolutionary
theory
only
existed
last
two
decades.
Here,
we
review
main
experimental
designs
used
evolution,
as
well
major
findings
related
generation
variation,
content-
and
model-based
biases,
cumulative
nonhuman
culture.
We
then
identify
methodological
advances
that
demonstrate
iterative
improvement
methods.
Finally,
focus
on
one
common
critique
experiments,
appropriate
individual
learning
control
condition
needed
culture,
present
an
original
investigation
relevant
this
critique.
Participants
completed
a
combinatorial
innovation
task
allowing
time
four
commonly
designs/conditions:
social
learners
chains,
groups,
experiencing
extended
session
lasting
same
accumulated
entire
chain
or
group,
repeated
sessions
adding
up
total
time.
found
resulted
superior
performance
any
other
condition.
discuss
these
light
relevance
specific
criticism
previous
studies
purport
demonstrated
also
use
our
broad
trade-offs
participants
face
when
individually
socially
different
contexts,
including
variable
acquisition
costs,
redundancy
effort
cognitive
motivational
fatigue.
Animal Behavior and Cognition,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
10(2), С. 163 - 168
Опубликована: Май 1, 2023
We
respond
to
the
commentary
by
Tennie
and
Call
(2023)
on
article
Koops
et
al.
(2022)
in
Nature
Human
Behaviour
titled
‘Field
experiments
find
no
evidence
that
chimpanzee
nut
cracking
can
be
independently
innovated.’
showed
is
not
a
so-called
‘latent
solution.’
Chimpanzees
(Pan
troglodytes
verus)
Nimba
Mountains
(Guinea)
did
crack
nuts
when
presented
with
stones
ecologically
valid
field
experiments.
In
their
Commentary,
argued
were
inconclusive
for
two
reasons:
1)
chimpanzees
motivated
treat
as
food,
2)
within
appropriate
‘sensitive
learning
period.’
our
response,
we
argue
incorrectly
use
term
‘motivation’
mean
‘willingness
eat
nut’,
which
requires
existing
knowledge
of
edibility
nuts.
also
point
out
it
unnatural
uninformative
inject
honey
motivate
them,
suggested
(2023).
Finally,
highlight
tested
appropriately
aged
subjects
(N=32
immatures).
Moreover,
there
suggest
strictly
sensitive
period
restricted
juvenility.
emphasize
need
researchers
doing
captivity
visit
study
species
wild,
involved
efforts
design
captivity.