Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 59(7), С. 1193 - 1200
Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2023
In this study, we assess how the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic influenced suicide risk patients with severe mental disorders in Germany.
Язык: Английский
JAMA Network Open, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 7(7), С. e2424601 - e2424601
Опубликована: Июль 30, 2024
Importance Given the expiration of expanded unemployment and other benefits during COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to understand association between pandemic income or job loss long-term implications on mental health. Objective To evaluate due later psychological distress. Design, Setting, Participants This cohort study used 5 waves nationally representative, longitudinal survey data (September 16, 2019, through September 18, 2022) from Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel. Doubly robust propensity score–weighted quasi-Poisson models were estimate self household early phase with distress, while controlling for pre–income characteristics (demographics, finances, distress). The sample comprised US working-age adults (aged 18-64 years) who had not experienced by March 24, 2020. Exposure Participant-reported (ie, reduced hours demand work) COVID19 2020, August Main Outcome Measures Psychological distress was measured using a composite scale 0 15 based participants’ reported frequency feeling depressed, edge, sleepless, lonely, hopeless in past week February 2021, 2022. Results Of 1392 (survey weighted 52.7% male 47.7% aged 30-49 before 35.7% 24 Early-phase associated higher 2021 (estimated ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = .03) 2022 1.11; 1.02-1.22; .02) among participants compared mean group did experience loss. Conclusions Relevance These small but significant within-person associations early-phase up 29 months suggest that policies are needed support people help mitigate adverse health outcomes economic disruption.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
8
Frontiers in Public Health, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12
Опубликована: Май 14, 2024
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among healthcare workers has been widely reported during initial and ongoing phases pandemic. Yet, little remains known about status primary in China post-pandemic era.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
4
Frontiers in Public Health, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 13
Опубликована: Май 1, 2025
A large body of evidence shows poorer mental health among lower socioeconomic groups, with chronic stress being an important pathway in this relationship. It was expected that the people low status may have been particularly affected by COVID-19 pandemic. While it has established also impacted during pandemic, aim study to analyze if pandemic-induced psychosocial (PIPS) mediated educational differences health-related quality life (MHRQOL) and which domains were affected. The data came from population-based representative "Corona Monitoring Nationwide - Wave 2 (RKI-SOEP-2)," November 2021-February 2022, restricted working age population (18-67 years, n = 7,425). mediating role PIPS (fractional rank variable 0 [lowest] 1 [highest education]) MHRQOL assessed for family, partnership, financial situation, work/school, social life, leisure time. We used causal mediation analysis estimate total, indirect, direct effects. increased higher education. Higher education associated more domain's time, while PIPS. significantly MHRQOL. No significant effect found partnership work/school contributed MHRQOL, different levels showing domains. Group-targeted domain-specific approaches prevention intervention should be considered.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
International Journal for Equity in Health, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 24(1)
Опубликована: Май 19, 2025
Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted progress toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and 3 (Good Health Well-Being). In Germany, labor market volatility, compounded by record inflation, widened social inequalities contributed to a gradient in mental health. This study examines relationship between household income health before, during, after German working population, addressing whether burdens persisted post-pandemic. Methods Using Socioeconomic Panel (v39.0), we applied quasi-experimental design employing ‘placebo control’ approach obtain difference-in-difference (DiD) estimates. For this purpose, created an ‘intervention’ sample consisting of respondents exposed ( N = 8,340, 2018–2022) sample, not 11,869, 2014–2018), designed mimic intervention sample. Sequence analysis identified six typical trajectories (S1–S6): high, regular, fluctuating-I-II, low unemployed. We used estimation methods assess impacts these during post-pandemic, stratified gender. Results results confirmed strong tied income. males, caused decline ~ ¼ standard deviation for reflecting regular (S2), fluctuating (S3), (S5) (e.g., S3-DiD -2.043 ** ), while those high or unemployed were unaffected. Females experienced more generalized across all trajectories. Post-pandemic, showed signs recovery but did fully return pre-pandemic levels. Conclusions These findings revealed that (S2–S5) are vulnerable crises. disproportionately affected, highlighting need targeted public interventions. Strengthening institutional supports, such as childcare, gender disparities can help build resilience advance SDGs.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 59(7), С. 1193 - 1200
Опубликована: Ноя. 23, 2023
In this study, we assess how the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic influenced suicide risk patients with severe mental disorders in Germany.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2