Vaccines,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10(2), С. 313 - 313
Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2022
Assessing
the
quality
of
evidence
from
vaccine
clinical
trials
is
essential
to
ensure
safety
and
efficacy
further
enhance
public
acceptance.
This
study
aims
summarize
critically
evaluate
harm
reporting
on
randomized
controlled
for
COVID-19
determine
factors
associated
with
quality.
We
systematically
searched
literature
using
PRISMA
guidelines
(RCT)
Vaccine
until
30
December
2021.
Published
articles
were
electronic
databases
such
as
PubMed,
Science
Direct,
Google
Scholar,
Bibliovid.
Bias
analysis
was
performed
RoB-2
tools.
The
assessed
by
Consolidated
Standards
Reporting
Trials
(CONSORT)
extension
modified
into
21
items.
A
total
61
RCT
studies
(402,014
patients)
analyzed.
Over
half
demonstrated
adequate
(59.02%),
(34.4%)
reported
a
low
risk
bias.
All
death
serious
adverse
events
(AEs),
but
only
six
mentioned
how
handle
recurrent
AEs.
AEs
in
subgroup
also
poor
(25%).
RCTs
less
biased
good
based
CONSORT
extension.
However,
must
be
considered,
especially
balance
information
between
effectivity
safety.
The
rapid
process
of
research
and
development
lack
follow-up
time
post-vaccination
aroused
great
public
concern
about
the
safety
profile
COVID-19
vaccine
candidates.
To
provide
comprehensive
overview
vaccines
by
using
meta-analysis
technique.
Military Medical Research,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
8(1)
Опубликована: Дек. 16, 2021
Abstract
Since
the
end
of
2019,
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
caused
by
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
has
spread
worldwide.
The
RNA
genome
SARS-CoV-2,
which
is
highly
infectious
and
prone
to
rapid
mutation,
encodes
both
structural
nonstructural
proteins.
Vaccination
currently
only
effective
method
prevent
COVID-19,
proteins
are
critical
targets
for
vaccine
development.
Currently,
many
vaccines
in
clinical
trials
or
already
on
market.
This
review
highlights
ongoing
advances
design
prophylactic
therapeutic
against
including
viral
vector
vaccines,
DNA
live-attenuated
inactivated
virus
recombinant
protein
bionic
nanoparticle
vaccines.
In
addition
traditional
some
novel
based
vectors,
nanoscience
synthetic
biology
also
play
important
roles
combating
COVID-19.
However,
challenges
persist
trials.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
36(5)
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2022
Abstract
After
about
2
years
since
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
(SARS‑CoV‑2),
first
infections
were
detected
in
Wuhan
city
of
China
December
2019,
which
was
followed
by
a
worldwide
pandemic
with
record
5.41
million
deaths.
Due
to
urgent
need
for
the
development
safe
and
effective
vaccine
disease
2019
(COVID‐19),
attempts
producing
efficient
vaccines
are
inexhaustibly
continuing.
According
report
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
on
COVID‐19
tracker
landscape,
there
149
candidates
all
over
world.
Inactivated
SARS‐CoV‐2
as
conventional
platform
consist
whole
virus
particles
grown
cell
culture
inactivated
chemicals.
Because
benefits
such
antigenic
similarity
real
virion
inducing
humoral
cellular
immune
responses
ease
transport
storage,
these
vaccines,
including
produced
Bharat
Biotech,
Sinopharm,
Sinovac,
use
at
large
scales.
In
this
study,
we
have
review
that
passing
their
phase
3
4
clinical
trials,
population
included
producers,
efficiency,
adverse
effects,
components
other
features.
Dermatologic Therapy,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
35(6)
Опубликована: Март 22, 2022
With
dermatologic
side
effects
being
fairly
prevalent
following
vaccination
against
COVID-19,
and
the
multitude
of
studies
aiming
to
report
analyze
these
adverse
events,
need
for
an
extensive
investigation
on
previous
seemed
urgent,
in
order
provide
a
thorough
body
information
about
post-COVID-19
immunization
mucocutaneous
reactions.
To
achieve
this
goal,
comprehensive
electronic
search
was
performed
through
international
databases
including
Medline
(PubMed),
Scopus,
Cochrane,
Web
science,
Google
scholar
July
12,
2021,
all
articles
regarding
manifestations
considerations
after
COVID-19
vaccine
administration
were
retrieved
using
keywords:
vaccine,
dermatology
manifestations.
A
total
917
records
final
number
180
included
data
extraction.
Mild,
moderate,
severe
potentially
life-threatening
events
have
been
reported
with
COVID
vaccines,
case
reports,
series,
observational
studies,
randomized
clinical
trials,
further
recommendations
consensus
position
papers
vaccination.
In
systematic
review,
we
categorized
results
detail
into
five
elaborate
tables,
making
what
believe
be
extensively
informative,
unprecedented
set
topic.
Based
our
findings,
viewpoint
pros
cons
vaccination,
mostly
non-significant,
self-limiting
reactions,
more
uncommon
moderate
guidelines
could
great
importance
those
at
higher
risks
specific
worries
flare-ups
or
inefficient
immunization,
sufficient
safely
schedule
their
doses,
avoid
if
they
discussed
contra-indications.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
36(11), С. 1947 - 1968
Опубликована: Июнь 6, 2022
Although
vaccination
is
widely
accepted
as
an
effective
method
of
preventing
and
controlling
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
many
people
are
concerned
about
possible
cutaneous
side-effects,
which
can
delay
or
prevent
them
from
being
vaccinated.
The
objectives
this
systematic
review
were
to
assess
global
prevalence
clinical
manifestations
adverse
reactions
following
vaccination.
PubMed
Scopus
databases
searched
for
articles
published
1
January
2019
31
December
2021,
reference
lists
each
selected
article
screened.
Case
reports,
case
series,
observational
studies
randomized
controlled
trials
that
provided
information
on
vaccines
included.
A
total
300
included
in
a
32
with
946
366
participants
meta-analysis.
pooled
was
3.8%
(95%
CI,
2.7%-5.3%).
based
mRNA
platform
had
higher
than
other
platforms
at
6.9%
3.8%-12.3%).
Various
have
been
reported
injection
site
reactions,
most
common
(72.16%)
uncommon
such
delayed
inflammatory
tissue
filler
(0.07%)
flares
pre-existing
dermatoses
(0.07%).
Severe
anaphylaxis
also
reported,
but
rare
cases
(0.05%).
In
conclusion,
common,
especially
those
receiving
vaccines.
Most
mild
not
contraindications
subsequent
except
anaphylaxis,
rarely
occurs.
may
be
associated
filler.
Patients
history
allergies,
skin
conditions
scheduled
injections
should
receive
additional
precounselling
monitoring.
better
understanding
potential
side-effects
strengthen
public
confidence
wary
new
vaccine
technologies.
Reviews in Medical Virology,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
33(1)
Опубликована: Май 1, 2022
Abstract
Designing
and
manufacturing
efficient
vaccines
against
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
is
a
major
objective.
In
this
systematic
review,
we
aimed
to
evaluate
the
most
important
under
construction
worldwide,
their
efficiencies
clinical
results
in
healthy
individuals
those
with
specific
underlying
diseases.
We
conducted
comprehensive
search
PubMed,
Scopus,
EMBASE,
Web
of
Sciences
by
1
December
2021
identify
published
research
studies.
The
inclusion
criteria
were
publications
that
evaluated
immune
responses
safety
COVID‐19
pre‐existing
also
searched
VAERS
database
estimate
incidence
adverse
events
special
interest
(AESI)
post
vaccination.
Almost
all
investigated
well
tolerated
developed
good
levels
both
humoural
cellular
responses.
A
protective
response
develops
after
second
or
third
dose
vaccine
longer
interval
(about
28
days)
between
first
injections
could
induce
higher
antibody
less
immunogenic
immunocompromised
patients,
particularly
haematological
malignancies.
addition,
found
venous
arterial
thrombotic
events,
Bell's
palsy,
myocarditis/pericarditis
common
AESI.
showed
potency
SARS‐CoV‐2
protect
subjects
disease.
provision
further
effective
safe
necessary
order
reach
high
coverage
immunisation
programs
across
globe
provide
protection
infection
itself.
Vaccines,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10(10), С. 1751 - 1751
Опубликована: Окт. 19, 2022
The
incidence
and
death
toll
due
to
SARS-CoV-2
infection
varied
time-to-time;
depended
on
several
factors,
including
severity
(viral
load),
immune
status,
age,
gender,
vaccination
presence
of
comorbidities.
RNA
genome
has
mutated
produced
variants,
which
were
classified
by
the
Interagency
Group
(SIG)
into
four
major
categories.
first
category;
“Variant
Being
Monitored
(VBM)”,
consists
Alpha
(B.1.1.7),
Beta
(B.1.351),
Gamma
(P.1),
Delta
(B.1.617.2),
Epsilon
(B.1.427,
B.1.429),
Eta
(B.1.525),
Iota
(B.1.526),
Kappa
(B.1.617.1),
Mu
(B.1.621),
Zeta
(P.2);
second
“Variants
Concern”
Omicron
(B.1.1.529).
third
fourth
categories
include
Interest
(VOI)”,
High
Consequence
(VOHC)”,
respectively,
contain
no
variants
currently
under
these
surge
in
VBM
VOC
poses
a
significant
threat
public
health
globally
as
they
exhibit
altered
virulence,
transmissibility,
diagnostic
or
therapeutic
escape,
ability
evade
host
response.
Studies
have
shown
that
certain
mutations
increase
infectivity
pathogenicity
virus
demonstrated
case
SARS-CoV-2,
variant.
It
is
reported
variant
>60
with
at
least
30
Spike
protein
(“S”
protein)
15
receptor-binding
domain
(RBD),
resulting
rapid
attachment
target
cells
evasion.
spread
VOCs
affected
actual
protective
efficacy
first-generation
vaccines
(ChAdOx1,
Ad26.COV2.S,
NVX-CoV2373,
BNT162b2).
Currently,
data
effectiveness
existing
against
newer
are
very
scanty;
hence
additional
studies
immediately
warranted.
To
this
end,
recent
initiated
investigations
elucidate
structural
features
crucial
proteins
their
involvement
pathogenesis.
In
addition,
intense
research
progress
develop
better
preventive
strategies
halt
COVID-19
caused
variants.
This
review
summarizes
structure
life
cycle
provides
background
information
associated
reviews
safety
vaccines/vaccine
candidates
approved
its
International Immunology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
33(10), С. 529 - 540
Опубликована: Сен. 7, 2021
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
has
caused
millions
of
deaths,
and
serious
consequences
to
public
health,
economies
societies.
Rapid
responses
in
vaccine
development
have
taken
place
since
the
isolation
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
release
viral
genome
sequence.
By
21
May
2021,
101
vaccines
were
under
clinical
trials,
published
data
available
for
18
them.
Clinical
study
results
from
some
indicated
good
immunogenicity
acceptable
reactogenicity.
Here,
we
focus
on
these
that
had
dissect
induced
humoral
cellular
immune
as
well
their
safety
profiles
protection
efficacy.