Contemporary Literature,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
60(1), С. 47 - 71
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2019
In
two
endings
that
foreshadow
planetary
catastrophe,
David
Mitchell's
Ghostwritten
(1999)
and
Richard
Powers's
The
Overstory
(2018)
revisit
the
classical
narrative
device
of
"deus
ex
machina"-an
unexpected
last-minute
intervention
alters
course
plot.Strictly
speaking,
however,
in
these
contemporary
novels
is
algorithmic,
not
divine:
an
artificial
intelligence
takes
control
planet
steers
it
away
from
anthropogenic
disaster
while
leaving
humanity
to
its
own
devices,
a
struggle
against
extinction.This
article
explores
significance
this
strategy
backdrop
broader
debates
on
form,
computational
culture,
ecological
disaster.I
argue
algorithmic
solution
implemented
Caracciolo
2
by
both
joins
formal
thematic
concerns
as
models
deep
uncertainty
humanity's
future
vis-à-vis
nonhuman
processes
underlie
today's
crisis.
The
Computational
Theory
of
Mind
says
that
the
mind
is
a
computing
system.
It
has
long
history
going
back
to
idea
thought
kind
computation.
Its
modern
incarnation
relies
on
analogies
with
contemporary
technology
and
use
computational
models.
comes
in
many
versions,
some
more
plausible
than
others.
This
Element
supports
theory
primarily
by
its
contribution
solving
mind-body
problem,
ability
explain
mental
phenomena,
success
modelling
artificial
intelligence.
To
be
turned
into
an
adequate
theory,
it
needs
made
compatible
tractability
cognition,
situatedness
dynamical
aspects
mind,
way
brain
works,
intentionality,
consciousness.
Animal
minds
are
complex
and
diverse,
making
them
difficult
to
study.
This
Element
focuses
on
a
question
that
has
received
much
attention
in
the
field
of
comparative
cognition:
'Do
animals
reason
about
unobservable
variables
like
force
mental
states?'
The
shows
how
researchers
design
studies
gather
evidence
address
this
question.
Despite
many
virtues
current
methods,
hypotheses
cognition
often
underdetermined
by
empirical
evidence.
Given
this,
philosophers
scientists
have
recently
called
for
additional
behavioral
constraints
theorizing
field.
endorses
proposal
(known
as
'signature
testing'),
while
also
arguing
animal
would
benefit
from
drawing
more
heavily
neuroscience
biology.
This
Element
surveys
contemporary
philosophical
and
psychological
work
on
various
forms
of
irrationality:
akrasia,
strange
beliefs,
implicit
bias.
It
takes
up
several
questions
in
an
effort
to
better
illuminate
these
more
maligned
aspects
human
behaviour
cognition:
what
is
rationality?
Why
it
irrational
act
against
one's
judgement?
Could
ever
be
rational
do
so?
What's
going
wrong
with
beliefs
conspiracy
theories,
those
arising
from
self-deception,
or
which
are
classed
as
delusional?
Might
some
them
fact
appropriate
responses
evidence?
Are
biases
when
they
conflict
our
avowed
beliefs?
Or
might
insofar
track
social
realities?
Philosophy of Science,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
91(3), С. 682 - 701
Опубликована: Окт. 4, 2023
Abstract
Cognitive
representations
are
typically
analyzed
in
terms
of
content,
vehicle,
and
format.
Although
current
work
on
formats
appeals
to
intuitions
about
external
representations,
such
as
words
maps,
this
article,
we
develop
a
computational
view
that
does
not
rely
intuitions.
In
our
view,
individuated
by
the
profiles
vehicles,
is,
set
constraints
fix
transformations
vehicles
can
undergo.
The
resulting
picture
is
strongly
pluralistic,
makes
space
for
variety
different
formats,
intimately
tied
approach
cognition
cognitive
science
artificial
intelligence.
Neurolaw
is
an
area
of
interdisciplinary
research
on
the
meaning
and
implications
neuroscience
for
law
legal
practices.
This
Element
addresses
potential
contributions
neuroscience,
brain
sciences
more
generally,
to
criminal
justice
decision-making
policy.
It
distinguishes
between
three
different
areas
domains
investigation
in
neurolaw:
assessment,
intervention,
revision.
The
first
concerns
brain-based
assessments,
which
may
be
used
predicting
future
violence,
lie
detection,
judging
insanity,
like.
second
treatments
other
interventions
that
aim
at
rehabilitating
criminals
and/or
preventing
crime
before
it
occurs.
third
investigates
ways
impact
by
changing
or
revising
commonsense
views
about
human
nature
causes
action.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2024
Abstract
This
book
articulates
and
defends
the
robust
mapping
account—the
most
systematic,
rigorous,
comprehensive
account
of
computational
implementation
to
date.
Drawing
in
part
from
recent
results
physical
information
theory,
it
argues
that
accounts
can
be
made
adequate
by
incorporating
appropriate
constraints.
According
account,
key
constraint
on
mappings
states—the
for
establishing
a
computation
is
physically
implemented—is
physical-computational
equivalence:
evolving
states
bear
neither
more
nor
less
about
than
do
they
map
onto.
When
this
highly
nontrivial
satisfied,
among
others
are
spelled
out
as
system
said
implement
sense,
which
means
bears
signature
computation.
The
applies
important
questions
foundations
cognitive
science,
including
alleged
indeterminacy
computation,
pancomputationalism,
theory
mind.
It
shows
determinate,
versions
pancomputationalism
fail,
cognition
involves
only
insofar
neurocognitive
systems
specific
computations.
also
both
consciousness
physics
outstrip
The
scientific
relationship
between
neuroscience
and
artificial
intelligence
is
generally
acknowledged,
the
role
that
their
long
history
of
collaboration
has
played
in
advancing
both
fields
often
emphasized.
Beyond
important
insights
provided
by
collaborative
development,
AI
raise
a
number
ethical
issues
are
explored
neuroethics
ethics.
Neuroethics
ethics
have
been
gaining
prominence
last
few
decades,
they
typically
carried
out
different
research
communities.
However,
considering
evolving
landscape
AI-assisted
neurotechnologies
various
conceptual
practical
intersections
neuroscience-such
as
increasing
application
neuroscientific
research,
healthcare
neurological
mental
diseases,
use
knowledge
inspiration
for
AI-some
scholars
now
calling
these
two
domains.
This
article
seeks
to
explore
how
can
stimulate
theoretical
and,
ideally,
governance
efforts.
First,
we
offer
some
reasons
reflection
on
innovations
AI.
Next,
dimensions
think
could
be
enhanced
cross-fertilization
subfields
We
believe
pace
fusion
development
innovations,
broad
underspecified
calls
responsibility
do
not
consider
from
will
only
partially
successful
promoting
meaningful
changes
applications.
This
Element
is
on
new
developments
in
the
psychology
of
reasoning
that
raise
or
address
philosophical
questions.
In
traditional
studies
reasoning,
focus
was
inference
from
arbitrary
assumptions
and
not
at
all
beliefs,
classical
binary
logic
presupposed
as
only
standard
for
human
reasoning.
But
recently
a
Bayesian
paradigm
has
emerged
discipline.
views
ordinary
mostly
inferring
probabilistic
conclusions
degrees
hypothetical
premises
relevant
to
purpose
hand,
often
about
revising
updating
belief.
also
covers
formulations
dual-process
theories
mind,
stating
there
are
two
types
mental
processing,
one
rapid
intuitive
shared
with
other
animals,
slow
reflective
more
characteristic
beings.
The
final
topic
covered
rationality.