Ageing Research Reviews, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 102666 - 102666
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Ageing Research Reviews, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 102666 - 102666
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Cell, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 187(7), С. 1589 - 1616
Опубликована: Март 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
154Cancer, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 128(19), С. 3531 - 3540
Опубликована: Авг. 8, 2022
Background Cancer incidence is higher in men than women at most shared anatomic sites for currently unknown reasons. The authors quantified the extent to which behaviors (smoking and alcohol use), anthropometrics (body mass index height), lifestyles (physical activity, diet, medications), medical history collectively explain male predominance of risk 21 cancer sites. Methods Prospective cohort analyses ( n = 171,274 122,826 female participants; age range, 50–71 years) National Institutes Health‐AARP Diet Health Study (1995–2011). Cancer‐specific Cox regression models were used estimate male‐to‐female hazard ratios (HRs). degree factors explained observed male–female disparity was using Peters–Belson method. Results There 26,693 incident cancers (17,951 8742 women). Incidence significantly lower only thyroid gallbladder cancers. At other sites, risks (adjusted HR 1.3–10.8), with strongest increases bladder (HR, 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.93–3.79), gastric cardia 3.49; CI, 2.26–5.37), larynx 3.53; 2.46–5.06), esophageal adenocarcinoma 10.80; 7.33–15.90). Risk a statistically significant (nonzero) proportion excess liver, biliary tract, bladder, skin, colon, rectum, lung. However, modest by (ranging from 50% lung 11% adenocarcinoma). Conclusions Men have Such largely unexplained factors, underscoring role sex‐related biologic factors.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
99Immunity, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 55(7), С. 1268 - 1283.e9
Опубликована: Июнь 13, 2022
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
97Trends in cancer, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 8(4), С. 303 - 315
Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2022
HighlightsSex differences in cancer incidence and survival are the norm evident across types, around globe, all genetic ancestries, age groups.Increasingly, sex cancer-relevant cellular systems biology being described.Sex mutational burden, DNA repair, epigenetics, metabolism, tumor suppressor activity, cell cycle regulation, immunity reported.AbstractSex have been evolutionarily selected to optimize reproductive success species with little (sperm) big (ova) gamete producers. They from time of fertilization accrue throughout development through genetic, epigenetic, circulating hormone-dependent mechanisms. Among other effects, they significantly impact on chromatin organization, immunity, longevity, risk survival. Sex should be expected accounted for basic, translational, clinical oncology research.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
78Nature, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 619(7970), С. 632 - 639
Опубликована: Июнь 21, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
75Nature Reviews Nephrology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 20(1), С. 37 - 55
Опубликована: Ноя. 22, 2023
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
66Cancer Discovery, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 13(9), С. 2090 - 2105
Опубликована: Июнь 28, 2023
Abstract Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) incidence and outcome are well recognized, emerging evidence suggests that these extend to genetic/epigenetic cellular differences, including immune responses. However, the mechanisms driving immunologic sex not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate T cells play a critical role GBM differences. Male mice exhibited accelerated tumor growth, with decreased frequency increased exhaustion of CD8+ tumor. Furthermore, higher progenitor exhausted was found males, improved responsiveness anti–PD-1 treatment. Moreover, T-cell observed male patients. Bone marrow chimera adoptive transfer models indicated cell–mediated control predominantly regulated cell-intrinsic manner, partially mediated by X chromosome inactivation escape gene Kdm6a. These findings sex-biased predetermined behavior is for inducing progression immunotherapy response. Significance: Immunotherapies patients have been unsuccessful due variety factors, highly immunosuppressive microenvironment GBM. This study demonstrates behaviors intrinsically regulated, further suggesting sex-specific approaches can be leveraged potentially improve therapeutic efficacy See related commentary Alspach, p. 1966. article featured Selected Articles from Issue, 1949
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
56Cancer Research, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 83(6), С. 906 - 921
Опубликована: Янв. 12, 2023
Sex is known to be an important factor in the incidence, progression, and outcome of cancer. A better understanding underlying mechanisms could help improve cancer prevention treatment. Here, we demonstrated a crucial role antitumor immunity sex differences Consistent with observations human cancers, male mice showed accelerated tumor progression compared females, but these were not observed immunodeficient mice. Androgen signaling suppressed T-cell against males. Mechanistically, androgen-activated androgen receptor upregulated expression USP18, which inhibited TAK1 phosphorylation subsequent activation NF-κB T cells. Reduction testosterone synthesis by surgical castration or using small-molecular inhibitor abiraterone significantly enhanced activity cells improved efficacy anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Together, this study revealed novel mechanism contributing These results indicate that inhibition promising approach immunotherapy males.Androgen induces immunosuppression blocking through upregulation USP18 activity, providing targetable axis
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
43Nature reviews. Cancer, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(5), С. 338 - 355
Опубликована: Апрель 8, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
22Nature Medicine, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 30(1), С. 51 - 60
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
20