Objective:
Research
on
Open
Science
practices
in
Health
Psychology
is
lacking.
This
study
aimed
to
identify
research
question
priorities
and
obtain
consensus
the
Top
5
prioritised
questions
for
Psychology.Methods
measures:
An
international
Delphi
was
conducted.
Twenty-three
experts
within
European
Society
(EHPS)
suggested
create
a
‘long-list’
of
items
(Phase
1).
Forty-three
EHPS
members
rated
importance
these
items,
ranked
their
top
five
own
additional
2).
Twenty-four
received
feedback
Phase
2
responses
then
re-rated
re-ranked
3).Results:
The
were:
1.
“To
what
extent
are
behaviours
currently
practised
Psychology?”,
2.
“How
can
we
maximise
usefulness
Data
Code
resources?”,
3.
be
increased
4.
“What
interventions
effective
increasing
adoption
Psychology?”
5.
increase
free
Access
publishing
Psychology?”.Conclusion:
Funding
resources
should
prioritise
identified
here.
Abstract
Background
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
UK
government
implemented
a
series
of
guidelines,
rules,
and
restrictions
to
change
citizens’
behaviour
tackle
spread
virus,
such
as
promotion
face
masks
imposition
lockdown
stay-at-home
orders.
The
success
measures
requires
active
co-operation
on
part
citizens,
but
compliance
was
not
complete.
Detailed
research
is
required
factors
that
aided
or
hindered
with
these
measures.
Methods
To
understand
facilitators
barriers
we
used
structural
topic
modelling,
text
mining
technique,
extract
themes
from
over
26,000
free-text
survey
responses
17,500
adults,
collected
between
17
November
23
December
2020.
Results
main
facilitating
were
desires
reduce
risk
oneself
one’s
family
friends
to,
lesser
extent,
general
public.
Also
importance
desire
return
normality,
availability
activities
technological
means
contact
friends,
ability
work
home.
Identified
difficulties
maintaining
social
distancing
in
public
(due
actions
other
people
environmental
constraints),
need
provide
receive
support
isolation,
missing
loved
ones,
mental
health
impacts,
perceiving
risks
low,
pressure
comply,
understanding
keep
abreast
changing
rules.
Several
raised
related
participant
characteristics.
Notably,
women
more
likely
discuss
needing
family.
Conclusion
results
demonstrated
an
array
contributed
guidelines.
Of
particular
policy
importance,
suggest
communication
emphasizes
potential
virus
provides
simple,
consistent
guidance
how
would
improve
preventive
behaviours
continues
for
future
pandemics.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
56(11), С. 1174 - 1187
Опубликована: Сен. 8, 2022
Abstract
Background
Hand
hygiene,
facemask
wearing,
and
physical
distancing
play
a
crucial
role
in
the
prevention
of
COVID-19
pandemic.
Identifying
key
psychosocial
determinants
these
precautionary
behaviors
contributes
to
effective
intervention
policymaking
for
future
pandemics.
Purpose
This
study
aimed
systematically
review
meta-analyze
available
evidence
on
general
population’s
practice
three
behaviors,
based
Risk,
Attitudes,
Norms,
Abilities,
Self-regulation
(RANAS)
framework.
Methods
Literature
was
identified
by
searching
seven
databases
relevant
papers.
Observational
experimental
studies
targeting
population
(≥18
years)
published
between
January
2020
September
2021
were
included.
Pooled
effect
sizes
calculated
with
inverse-variance
method
using
random-effects
models.
Results
A
total
51
(64
samples)
included
qualitative
synthesis,
which
30
(42
meta-analysis.
RANAS-based
constructs
including
knowledge,
pros
attitudes,
perceived
norms
as
significant
all
Perceived
susceptibility
cons
attitudes
showed
no
associations
any
behaviors.
severity,
control,
self-efficacy,
behavioral
intention
significantly
associated
one
or
two
Country
(western
vs.
eastern
hemispheres)
moderated
effects
certain
risk
ability
factors.
Conclusions
More
research
is
needed
respect
intention–behavior
relationship,
self-regulatory
reflexive
factors
well
exploration
potential
moderating
sociodemographic
Social Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(5), С. 275 - 275
Опубликована: Май 20, 2024
Social
distancing
and
the
use
of
masks
are
crucial
to
prevent
spread
SARS-COV-2.
Knowledge
determinants
this
behavior
is
essential
promote
effective
communication
with
public
in
future
health
crises
that
require
mass
compliance
preventive
behaviors.
This
systematic
review
focused
on
scientific
evidence
related
cognitive
factors
underlie
intention
young
adults’
adhere
social
(distancing
and/or
facial
masks)
against
COVID-19.
A
literature
search
electronic
database,
PubMed,
Scopus,
Web
Science,
EBSCO
was
performed
December
2022
according
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-Analysis
guidelines.
The
PEO
(Population:
adults,
Exposure:
COVID-19,
Outcome:
adults
developed
identify
terms
inclusion/exclusion
criteria.
Eight
studies
met
eligibility
None
were
seriously
flawed
quality
assessment,
they
considered
have
a
low
risk
bias
selection.
Several
emerged
analysis.
For
both
masks,
most
relevant
adherence
include
perception
perceived
severity,
moral
value
fairness,
responsibility,
trust
government,
respect
authority,
institutional
communication.
Adherence
found
self-efficacy.
These
results
reinforce
models
showing
relevance
cognitions
behavior,
highlight
responsibility
official
institutions
development
contexts
adapting
promotion
recommendations
launch.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10
Опубликована: Авг. 19, 2022
Background
The
best
way
to
prevent
COVID-19
is
observe
health
protocols.
Therefore,
identifying
the
reasons
of
following
these
protocols
in
order
plan
and
make
intervention
seems
necessary.
purpose
this
study
was
identify
determinants
observing
related
prevention
among
Iranian
adult
women
with
a
qualitative
approach.
Method
In
study,
conventional
content
analysis
approach
used.
saturation
obtained
after
face-to-face
semi-structured
interviews
38
from
Kermanshah
who
were
selected
through
purposeful
sampling
snowball
sampling.
Guba
Lincoln
criteria
used
for
strength
research
Graneheim
Lundman
method
its
analysis.
Results
After
analyzing
interviews,
5
categories,
12
subcategories
110
initial
codes
obtained.
Categories
sub-categories
were:
1-
Individual
factors
(personality
traits,
literacy
about
COVID-19);
2-
Perceived
risk
having
underlying
disease
oneself
family,
history
getting
death
close
relatives;
3-
Fear
destructive
consequences
(concern
economic
disease,
concern
treatment
process);
4-
Social
cultural
(social
monitoring,
religious
insight,
ability
properly
manage
social
interactions,
impressionability
important
others);
5-
Environmental
(supportive
living
environment,
access
anti-infective
materials).
Conclusion
Increasing
adherence
instructions
requires
interventions
at
different
levels
individual,
environmental
social,
without
accurate
knowledge
customs
culture
society
effective
cannot
be
established.
Abstract
Introduction
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
presented
a
unique
possibility
to
broaden
the
understanding
of
people’s
reactions
global
crisis.
Early
on,
it
became
evident
that
older
adults
were
particularly
vulnerable
virus
and
actions
this
age
group
would
be
crucial
outcome.
This
qualitative
interview
study
uses
Health
Belief
Model
(HBM)
framework
as
an
analytical
tool
examine
experiences
adherence
recommendations
during
initial
phase
pandemic.
It
is
important
view
in
context
Sweden’s
voluntary
restrictions,
which
further
highlight
nature
research.
Method
In
April-May
2020,
41
aged
70–85
participated
unstructured
phone
interviews.
objective
was
investigate
adults’
perceptions
pandemic,
their
disease
conditions
influenced
health
recommendations.
HBM
used
guide
analysis
Results
Despite
perceiving
severe
threat
society,
participants
did
not
let
fear
dominate
responses.
Instead,
they
demonstrated
remarkable
resilience
proactive
approach.
For
some,
perceived
susceptibility
primary
motivator
for
Swedish
national
Notably,
trust
authorities
family
members’
requests
significantly
bolstered
adherence.
Moreover,
found
contribute
feelings
safety.
Conversely,
potential
barriers
adhering
included
missing
loved
ones
frustration
with
sometimes
ambiguous
information
from
authorities.
Conclusions
results
indicate
are
willing
adhere
restrictions
Relatives
people
resource
communicating
regarding
safety
messages,
message
preferably
thorough
consistent.
Further,
much
can
gained
if
loneliness
isolation
mitigated
since
appears
barrier
Globalization and Health,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2023
Abstract
Background
Identifying
common
factors
that
affect
public
adherence
to
COVID-19
containment
measures
can
directly
inform
the
development
of
official
health
communication
strategies.
The
present
international
longitudinal
study
aimed
examine
whether
prosociality,
together
with
other
theoretically
derived
motivating
(self-efficacy,
perceived
susceptibility
and
severity
COVID-19,
social
support)
predict
change
in
Method
In
wave
1
data
collection,
adults
from
eight
geographical
regions
completed
online
surveys
beginning
April
2020,
2
began
June
ended
September
2020.
Hypothesized
predictors
included
self-efficacy
following
measures,
support.
Baseline
covariates
age,
sex,
history
infection
regions.
Participants
who
reported
adhering
specific
including
physical
distancing,
avoidance
non-essential
travel
hand
hygiene,
were
classified
as
adherence.
dependent
variable
was
category
adherence,
which
constructed
based
on
changes
across
survey
period
four
categories:
non-adherence,
less
greater
sustained
(which
designated
reference
category).
Results
total,
2189
adult
participants
(82%
female,
57.2%
aged
31–59
years)
East
Asia
(217
[9.7%]),
West
(246
[11.2%]),
North
South
America
(131
[6.0%]),
Northern
Europe
(600
[27.4%]),
Western
(322
[14.7%]),
Southern
(433
[19.8%]),
Eastern
(148
[6.8%])
(96
[4.4%])
analyzed.
Adjusted
multinomial
logistic
regression
analyses
showed
self-efficacy,
significant
affecting
at
likely
become
non-adherence
by
26%
(adjusted
odds
ratio
[aOR],
0.74;
95%
CI,
0.71
0.77;
P
<
.001),
while
those
prosociality
23%
(aOR,
0.75
0.79;
=
.04).
Conclusions
This
provides
evidence
addition
emphasizing
potential
contact
virus,
fostering
strategies
appears
be
a
viable
education
or
strategy
combat
COVID-19.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(1)
Опубликована: Июнь 21, 2022
Social
mixing
contributes
to
the
transmission
of
SARS-CoV-2.
We
developed
a
composite
measure
for
risky
social
mixing,
investigating
changes
during
pandemic
and
factors
associated
with
mixing.
Forty-five
waves
online
cross-sectional
surveys
were
used
(n
=
78,917
responses;
14
September
2020
13
April
2022).
investigated
socio-demographic,
contextual
psychological
engaging
in
highest
risk
England
at
seven
timepoints.
Patterns
varied
over
time,
broadly
line
restrictions.
Engaging
was
being
younger,
less
worried
about
COVID-19,
perceiving
lower
COVID-19
be
severe
illness,
thinking
risks
exaggerated,
not
agreeing
that
one's
personal
behaviour
had
an
impact
on
how
spreads,
information
from
UK
Government
can
trusted.
Our
restrictions
place
time
data
collection,
providing
some
validation
measure.
While
messages
targeting
may
reduce
higher
achieving
large
change
short
space
necessitate
reimposition
Psychology and Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 25
Опубликована: Окт. 31, 2022
Objective
Research
on
Open
Science
practices
in
Health
Psychology
is
lacking.
This
meta-research
study
aimed
to
identify
research
question
priorities
and
obtain
consensus
the
Top
5
prioritised
questions
for
Psychology.Methods
measures
An
international
Delphi
was
conducted.
Twenty-three
experts
within
European
Society
(EHPS)
suggested
create
a
'long-list'
of
items
(Phase
1).
Forty-three
EHPS
members
rated
importance
these
items,
ranked
their
top
five
own
additional
2).
Twenty-four
received
feedback
Phase
2
responses
then
re-rated
re-ranked
3).Results
The
were:
1.
'To
what
extent
are
behaviours
currently
practised
Psychology?',
2.
'How
can
we
maximise
usefulness
Data
Code
resources?',
3.
be
increased
4.
'What
interventions
effective
increasing
adoption
Psychology?'
5.
increase
free
Access
publishing
Psychology?'.Conclusion
Funding
resources
should
prioritise
identified
here.
Risk Analysis,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
44(2), С. 322 - 332
Опубликована: Май 3, 2023
Abstract
Public
adoption
of
preventative
behaviors
to
reduce
the
transmission
COVID‐19
is
crucial
managing
pandemic,
and
so
it
vital
determine
what
factors
influence
uptake
those
behaviors.
Previous
studies
have
identified
risk
perceptions
as
a
key
factor,
but
this
work
has
typically
been
limited
both
in
assuming
that
means
personal
self,
being
reliant
on
self‐reported
data.
Drawing
social
identity
approach,
we
conducted
two
online
which
investigated
effects
different
types
measure
taking:
self
collective
(i.e.,
members
group
with
one
identifies).
Both
involved
behavioral
measures
using
innovative
interactive
tasks.
In
Study
1
(
n
=
199;
data
collected
27
May
2021),
(inter)personal
physical
distancing.
2
553;
20
September
speed
at
tests
are
booked
symptoms
develop.
studies,
find
risk,
not
extent
adopted.
We
discuss
implications
conceptually
(as
they
relate
conceptualization
processes)
also
practically
(in
terms
for
public
health
communications).
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(3)
Опубликована: Июнь 22, 2023
The
COVID-19
pandemic,
caused
by
the
SARS-CoV-2
virus,
has
resulted
in
illness,
deaths
and
societal
disruption
on
a
global
scale.
Societies
have
implemented
various
control
measures
to
reduce
transmission
of
virus
mitigate
its
impact.
Individual
behavioural
changes
are
crucial
successful
implementation
these
measures.
Common
recommended
limit
risk
infection
include
frequent
handwashing,
reducing
frequency
social
interactions
use
face
coverings.
It
is
important
identify
those
factors
that
can
predict
uptake
maintenance
protective
behaviours.