Conducting transgender research with Rohingya hijra participants: reflections on methodological and ethical considerations
Development in Practice,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 18
Опубликована: Март 12, 2025
Язык: Английский
Is it even worth it? The ethics of researching armed groups in ‘the field’
Conflict Security and Development,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 34
Опубликована: Сен. 30, 2024
Язык: Английский
Context is everything: A realist response to the commentary on epistemic racism in anti-doping research by Ruwuya et al. 2024
Performance Enhancement & Health,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. 100312 - 100312
Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Speaking of Epistemic Injustice: A Reply
Journal of Human Rights Practice,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
15(2), С. 374 - 394
Опубликована: Июнь 24, 2023
Abstract
In
this
article,
we
reply
to
‘Ethics
and
Epistemic
Injustice
in
the
Global
South’
(Kaur
et
al.
2023),
a
response
original
article
‘Covert
Qualitative
Research
as
Method
Study
Human
Rights
Under
Authoritarian
Regimes’
(Hopman
2022).
Our
is
written
by
authors
who
have
expertise
direct
experience
with
issues
at
stake
(authoritarianism,
North/Global
South
relations,
covert
research
methods,
epistemic
injustice).
We
show
that
while
there
are
some
interesting
points
raised
general,
it
does
not
do
justice
arguments
presented
article.
Instead
constructs
‘straw
man’
misrepresenting
claims
attributing
assumptions
were
there,
lumping
together
notions
such
authoritarian
zones
South,
equated
After
providing
for
position
discussing
main
topics
of
critique,
present
two
new
elements:
first,
contribution
someone
from
Moroccan
controlled
Western
Sahara
(MCWS),
experienced
participant.
Second,
an
overview
lessons
learned
exchange.
These
include:
1)
instead
zones,
‘authoritarian
situations’
more
appropriate
concept;
2)
projects
using
should
strive
include
overt
participatory
elements;
3)
alleging
injustice
create
space
people
concerned
speak
themselves.
Язык: Английский
Protection and Assistance to the Family: Interpreting and Applying Article 10 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights from Learnt and Lived Experiences
Journal of Human Rights Practice,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
16(2), С. 489 - 511
Опубликована: Май 20, 2024
Abstract
This
article
conceptualizes
and
operationalizes
the
right
to
protection
assistance
family
(Article
10
of
International
Covenant
on
Economic,
Social
Cultural
Rights)
in
relation
child
services
England
removal
children
from
birth
families
that
are
deemed
pose
a
risk
them.
It
identifies
differences
between
social
more
commonly
known
civil
private
life.
The
merges
doctrinal
analysis
international
human
rights
law
with
peer-led
methodology
socio-legal
research
reliant
issue
prioritization
observations
workers,
poverty—primarily
mothers—and
young
people
who
have
experience
care
system.
process
aims
respect
all
different
forms
knowledge
challenge
epistemic
injustices
result
systematic
silencing
poverty.
Besides
this
value,
lived
can
illuminate
academic
practitioner
understanding
main
problems
facing
In
particular,
family,
shed
light
impact
prejudice
lack
adequate
material
support.
Язык: Английский
Opposition or Acquiescence to Neoliberal Hegemony? A Sociological Analysis of the Use of Human Rights Frames in UK Social Movements
Journal of Human Rights Practice,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 25, 2024
Abstract
Building
on
recent
work
in
the
field
of
sociology
rights
which
emphasizes
‘social
life
rights’
and
interaction
between
micro-level
social
constructions
via
movement
action,
macro-level
systemic
forces,
this
paper
constructs
a
counter-hegemonic
theory
human
rights.
By
drawing
both
Gramscian
theories
Social
Reproduction
Theory
framework,
novel
view
neoliberal
hegemony
is
described.
The
role
as
part
then
clarified
an
essential
element
production
consent
to
hegemony.
This
hegemonic
form
contrasted
against
construction
grounded
data
generated
from
10
in-depth
qualitative
interviews
conducted
with
activists
UK.
Three
findings
are
interviewed
1)
consistently
rejected
hegemonic,
legal/non-governmental
organization
structures;
2)
used
introduction
their
activism
base
upon
further
critiques
built;
3)
frequently
contest
commodification
socially
reproductive
goods.
Considering
these
findings,
contesting
resisting
wider
considered.
While
not
considered
have
produced
level
action
required
overcome
deeply
embedded
neoliberalism,
hold
potential
contribute
challenging
coercion
neoliberalism
Язык: Английский