Opposition or Acquiescence to Neoliberal Hegemony? A Sociological Analysis of the Use of Human Rights Frames in UK Social Movements DOI
John Duncan

Journal of Human Rights Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 25, 2024

Abstract Building on recent work in the field of sociology rights which emphasizes ‘social life rights’ and interaction between micro-level social constructions via movement action, macro-level systemic forces, this paper constructs a counter-hegemonic theory human rights. By drawing both Gramscian theories Social Reproduction Theory framework, novel view neoliberal hegemony is described. The role as part then clarified an essential element production consent to hegemony. This hegemonic form contrasted against construction grounded data generated from 10 in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with activists UK. Three findings are interviewed 1) consistently rejected hegemonic, legal/non-governmental organization structures; 2) used introduction their activism base upon further critiques built; 3) frequently contest commodification socially reproductive goods. Considering these findings, contesting resisting wider considered. While not considered have produced level action required overcome deeply embedded neoliberalism, hold potential contribute challenging coercion neoliberalism

Language: Английский

Conducting transgender research with Rohingya hijra participants: reflections on methodological and ethical considerations DOI Creative Commons
Kazi Ashraf Uddin

Development in Practice, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 18

Published: March 12, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Is it even worth it? The ethics of researching armed groups in ‘the field’ DOI Creative Commons
Niamatullah Ibrahimi, Romain Malejacq

Conflict Security and Development, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 34

Published: Sept. 30, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Context is everything: A realist response to the commentary on epistemic racism in anti-doping research by Ruwuya et al. 2024 DOI Creative Commons
Andrea Petróczi, Dennis Dreiskämper, Vassilis Barkoukis

et al.

Performance Enhancement & Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100312 - 100312

Published: Nov. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Speaking of Epistemic Injustice: A Reply DOI Creative Commons
Marieke Hopman,

Guleid Ahmed Jama,

Olga Zvonareva

et al.

Journal of Human Rights Practice, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 15(2), P. 374 - 394

Published: June 24, 2023

Abstract In this article, we reply to ‘Ethics and Epistemic Injustice in the Global South’ (Kaur et al. 2023), a response original article ‘Covert Qualitative Research as Method Study Human Rights Under Authoritarian Regimes’ (Hopman 2022). Our is written by authors who have expertise direct experience with issues at stake (authoritarianism, North/Global South relations, covert research methods, epistemic injustice). We show that while there are some interesting points raised general, it does not do justice arguments presented article. Instead constructs ‘straw man’ misrepresenting claims attributing assumptions were there, lumping together notions such authoritarian zones South, equated After providing for position discussing main topics of critique, present two new elements: first, contribution someone from Moroccan controlled Western Sahara (MCWS), experienced participant. Second, an overview lessons learned exchange. These include: 1) instead zones, ‘authoritarian situations’ more appropriate concept; 2) projects using should strive include overt participatory elements; 3) alleging injustice create space people concerned speak themselves.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Protection and Assistance to the Family: Interpreting and Applying Article 10 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights from Learnt and Lived Experiences DOI Creative Commons
Koldo Casla,

Lyle Barker

Journal of Human Rights Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(2), P. 489 - 511

Published: May 20, 2024

Abstract This article conceptualizes and operationalizes the right to protection assistance family (Article 10 of International Covenant on Economic, Social Cultural Rights) in relation child services England removal children from birth families that are deemed pose a risk them. It identifies differences between social more commonly known civil private life. The merges doctrinal analysis international human rights law with peer-led methodology socio-legal research reliant issue prioritization observations workers, poverty—primarily mothers—and young people who have experience care system. process aims respect all different forms knowledge challenge epistemic injustices result systematic silencing poverty. Besides this value, lived can illuminate academic practitioner understanding main problems facing In particular, family, shed light impact prejudice lack adequate material support.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Opposition or Acquiescence to Neoliberal Hegemony? A Sociological Analysis of the Use of Human Rights Frames in UK Social Movements DOI
John Duncan

Journal of Human Rights Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 25, 2024

Abstract Building on recent work in the field of sociology rights which emphasizes ‘social life rights’ and interaction between micro-level social constructions via movement action, macro-level systemic forces, this paper constructs a counter-hegemonic theory human rights. By drawing both Gramscian theories Social Reproduction Theory framework, novel view neoliberal hegemony is described. The role as part then clarified an essential element production consent to hegemony. This hegemonic form contrasted against construction grounded data generated from 10 in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with activists UK. Three findings are interviewed 1) consistently rejected hegemonic, legal/non-governmental organization structures; 2) used introduction their activism base upon further critiques built; 3) frequently contest commodification socially reproductive goods. Considering these findings, contesting resisting wider considered. While not considered have produced level action required overcome deeply embedded neoliberalism, hold potential contribute challenging coercion neoliberalism

Language: Английский

Citations

0