There
is
increasing
evidence
that
moral
and
emotional
rhetoric
spreads
widely
on
social
media
associated
with
intergroup
conflict,
polarization,
the
spread
of
misinformation.
However,
this
literature
largely
correlational,
making
it
unclear
why
content
drives
sharing
conflict.
In
research,
we
examine
causal
impact
moral-emotional
decisions
examining
how
identity
shapes
antecedents
functional
outcomes
to
share.
Across
five
pre-registered
experiments
(N
=
2,498),
find
robust
inclusion
expressions
in
political
messages
causes
intentions
share
media.
Moreover,
individual
differences
strength
partisan
identification
ideological
extremity
are
predictors
expressions,
even
when
accounting
for
attitude
strength.
But
only
found
mixed
brief
manipulations
salience
increased
sharing.
terms
outcomes,
partisans
choose
language,
people
perceive
them
as
more
strongly
identified
among
their
ingroup,
but
less
open-minded
worthy
conversation
outgroup
members.
These
highlight
role
expression
online
intentions,
such
networks
can
serve
ingroup
reputation
functions
while
hindering
discourse
between
groups.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
7(6), С. 892 - 903
Опубликована: Март 6, 2023
The
extent
to
which
belief
in
(mis)information
reflects
lack
of
knowledge
versus
a
motivation
be
accurate
is
unclear.
Here,
across
four
experiments
(n
=
3,364),
we
motivated
US
participants
by
providing
financial
incentives
for
correct
responses
about
the
veracity
true
and
false
political
news
headlines.
Financial
improved
accuracy
reduced
partisan
bias
judgements
headlines
30%,
primarily
increasing
perceived
from
opposing
party
(d
0.47).
Incentivizing
people
identify
that
would
liked
their
allies,
however,
decreased
accuracy.
Replicating
prior
work,
conservatives
were
less
at
discerning
than
liberals,
yet
closed
gap
between
liberals
52%.
A
non-financial
intervention
was
also
effective,
suggesting
motivation-based
interventions
are
scalable.
Altogether,
these
results
suggest
substantial
portion
people's
motivational
factors.
BMJ,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. e076542 - e076542
Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2024
###
Key
messages
Vaccine
misinformation
on
social
media
has
strong
effects
behaviour,
and
the
evidence
base
for
interventions
to
reduce
these
is
limited,
but
better
approaches
generation
are
possible,
say
Kai
Ruggeri
colleagues
Effective
population
level
vaccination
campaigns
fundamental
public
health.123
Counter
campaigns,
which
as
old
first
vaccines,4
disrupt
uptake
can
threaten
health
globally.4
In
2019,
researchers
linked
increases
in
measles
cases
with
proliferation
of
global
anti-vaccine
campaigns.5
Some
originated
offline
were
later
amplified
expedited
through
media,
resulting
real
world
harms.6
Though
crises
genuine
safety
concerns
also
lower
vaccine
uptake,78
return
after
aggressive
prompted
World
Health
Organisation
list
hesitancy
among
greatest
threats
(box
1).14
Box
1
Here,
we
use
term
“vaccine
hesitancy”
originally
defined
by
WHO9:
a
“delay
acceptance
or
refusal
despite
availability
services.”
This
definition,
plus
expanded
description
variation
based
time,
place,
population,
gives
broad
understanding
allows
us
distinguish
behaviour
from
underpinning
psychological,
environmental,
structural
aspects
influencing
behaviour.
definition
most
commonly
used
literature
pre-dating
covid-19.
there
debates
about
appropriate
…
RETURN
TO
TEXT
Low
uptake
of
the
COVID-19
vaccine
in
US
has
been
widely
attributed
to
social
media
misinformation.
To
evaluate
this
claim,
we
introduce
a
framework
combining
lab
experiments
(total
N
=
18,725),
crowdsourcing,
and
machine
learning
estimate
causal
effect
13,206
vaccine-related
URLs
on
vaccination
intentions
Facebook
users
(
≈
233
million).
We
that
impact
unflagged
content
nonetheless
encouraged
skepticism
was
46-fold
greater
than
misinformation
flagged
by
fact-checkers.
Although
reduced
predicted
significantly
more
when
viewed,
users’
exposure
limited.
In
contrast,
stories
highlighting
rare
deaths
after
were
among
Facebook’s
most-viewed
stories.
Our
work
emphasizes
need
scrutinize
factually
accurate
but
potentially
misleading
addition
outright
falsehoods.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
25, С. e42227 - e42227
Опубликована: Фев. 3, 2023
Background
Vaccinations
play
a
critical
role
in
mitigating
the
impact
of
COVID-19
and
other
diseases.
Past
research
has
linked
misinformation
to
increased
hesitancy
lower
vaccination
rates.
Gaps
remain
our
knowledge
about
main
drivers
vaccine
on
social
media
effective
ways
intervene.
Objective
Our
longitudinal
study
had
two
primary
objectives:
(1)
investigate
patterns
prevalence
contagion
Twitter
2021,
(2)
identify
spreaders
misinformation.
Given
initial
results,
we
further
considered
likely
its
spread,
providing
insights
for
potential
interventions.
Methods
We
collected
almost
300
million
English-language
tweets
related
vaccines
using
list
over
80
relevant
keywords
period
12
months.
then
extracted
labeled
news
articles
at
source
level
based
third-party
lists
low-credibility
mainstream
sources,
measured
different
kinds
information.
also
suspicious
YouTube
videos
shared
Twitter.
focused
analysis
verified
automated
accounts.
Results
findings
showed
relatively
low
information
compared
entirety
news.
However,
most
popular
sources
reshare
volumes
comparable
those
many
larger
than
authoritative
such
as
US
Centers
Disease
Control
Prevention
World
Health
Organization.
Throughout
year,
observed
an
increasing
trend
vaccines.
considerable
amount
Tweets
by
small
group
approximately
800
“superspreaders”
accounted
35%
all
reshares
average
day,
with
top
superspreader
(@RobertKennedyJr)
responsible
13%
retweets.
Finally,
were
more
be
Conclusions
The
wide
spread
around
during
2021
shows
that
there
was
audience
this
type
content.
are
consistent
hypothesis
superspreaders
driven
financial
incentives
allow
them
profit
from
health
Despite
high-profile
cases
deplatformed
superspreaders,
results
show
few
individuals
still
played
outsized
As
result,
moderation
efforts
would
better
served
focusing
reducing
online
visibility
repeat
harmful
content,
especially
public
crises.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(2)
Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2023
Declining
trends
in
vaccine
confidence
come
at
a
time
when
routine
immunization
coverage
for
children
has
slumped
to
decades-long
low.
With
some
of
the
largest
losses
experienced
among
young
adults,
this
is
concerning
trend
with
potential
long-term
implications.
This
article
reflects
on
recent
research
examining
levels
and
over
across
globe,
drivers
influencing
confidence,
role
COVID-19
pandemic
shaping
today.
Timely
examination
causes
consequences
waning
critical
evaluation
response
measures
will
prove
vital
mitigating
additional
uptake
while
contributing
building
resilience
face
future
health
crises.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(5), С. 781 - 795
Опубликована: Сен. 26, 2023
Recent
studies
have
documented
the
type
of
content
that
is
most
likely
to
spread
widely,
or
go
“viral,”
on
social
media,
yet
little
known
about
people’s
perceptions
what
goes
viral
should
viral.
This
critical
understand
because
there
widespread
debate
how
improve
regulate
media
algorithms.
We
recruited
a
sample
participants
nationally
representative
U.S.
population
(according
age,
gender,
and
race/ethnicity)
surveyed
them
their
virality
(
n
=
511).
In
line
with
prior
research,
people
believe
divisive
content,
moral
outrage,
negative
high-arousal
misinformation
are
all
online.
However,
they
reported
this
not
media.
Instead,
many
forms
positive
content—such
as
accurate
nuanced
educational
content—are
even
though
think
These
were
shared
among
only
weakly
related
political
orientation,
usage,
demographic
variables.
sum,
broad
consensus
around
platforms
amplify,
which
can
help
inform
solutions
for
improving
Annual Review of Psychology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
75(1), С. 311 - 340
Опубликована: Окт. 31, 2023
Nearly
five
billion
people
around
the
world
now
use
social
media,
and
this
number
continues
to
grow.
One
of
primary
goals
media
platforms
is
capture
monetize
human
attention.
means
by
which
individuals
groups
can
attention
drive
engagement
on
these
sharing
morally
emotionally
evocative
content.
We
review
a
growing
body
research
interrelationship
morality
as
well
its
consequences
for
society.
Moral
content
often
goes
viral
makes
moral
behavior
(such
punishment)
less
costly.
Thus,
acts
an
accelerant
existing
dynamics,
amplifying
outrage,
status
seeking,
intergroup
conflict
while
also
potentially
more
constructive
facets
morality,
such
support,
prosociality,
collective
action.
discuss
trends,
heated
debates,
future
directions
in
emerging
literature.
Nature Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
30(11), С. 3085 - 3093
Опубликована: Окт. 25, 2024
In
addition
to
social
determinants
of
health,
such
as
economic
resources,
education,
access
care
and
various
environmental
factors,
there
is
growing
evidence
that
political
polarization
poses
a
substantial
risk
individual
collective
well-being.
Here
we
review
the
impact
on
public
health.
We
describe
different
forms
how
they
are
connected
health
outcomes,
highlighting
COVID-19
pandemic
case
study
risks
polarization.
then
offer
strategies
for
mitigating
potential
harms
associated
with
polarization,
an
emphasis
building
trust.
Finally,
propose
future
research
directions
this
topic,
underscore
need
more
work
in
global
context
encourage
greater
collaboration
between
scientists
medical
scientists.
conclude
serious—if
largely
overlooked—determinant
whose
impacts
must
be
thoroughly
understood
mitigated.
Political
understudied
determinant
This
Review
describes
types
populations
individuals,
including
mitigation
priorities.
Perceived
experts
(i.e.
medical
professionals
and
biomedical
scientists)
are
trusted
sources
of
information
who
especially
effective
at
encouraging
vaccine
uptake.
The
role
perceived
acting
as
potential
antivaccine
influencers
has
not
been
characterized
systematically.
We
describe
the
prevalence
importance
by
constructing
a
coengagement
network
7,720
accounts
based
on
Twitter
data
set
containing
over
4.2
million
posts
from
April
2021.
primarily
broke
into
two
large
communities
that
differed
in
their
stance
toward
COVID-19
vaccines,
misinformation
was
predominantly
shared
community.
had
sizable
presence
across
network,
including
within
community
where
they
were
9.8%
individual,
English-language
users.
low-quality
(misinformation)
similar
rates
academic
higher
compared
to
nonexperts
occupied
important
positions
central
users
bridges
between
provaccine
communities.
Using
propensity
score
matching,
we
found
expertise
brought
an
influence
boost,
significantly
more
likely
receive
likes
retweets
both
There
no
significant
difference
magnitude
boost
for
Social
media
platforms,
scientific
communications,
organizations
may
focus
systemic
interventions
reduce
impact
spreading
misinformation.