
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 377(1865)
Опубликована: Окт. 17, 2022
Open AccessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Sheng Guojun, Boroviak Thorsten E., Schmidt-Ott Urs and Srinivas Shankar 2022Extraembryonic tissues: exploring concepts, definitions functions across the animal kingdomPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B3772021025020210250http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0250SectionOpen AccessIntroductionExtraembryonic kingdom Guojun http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-3785 International Research Center for Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 860-0811, Japan [email protected] Contribution: Writing – original draft, review & editing Google Scholar Find author on PubMed Search more papers by , E. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-8949 Department of Physiology, Development Neuroscience, University Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1351-9472 Organismal Biology Anatomy, Chicago, IL 60637, USA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-7791 Anatomy Genetics, Oxford, Oxford OX3 7TY, Published:17 October 2022https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.02501. IntroductionAll emerging life must function while being built. The developing embryo requires an aqueous environment, a supply nutrients, gas exchange waste management. Extraembryonic membranes accomplish these challenges providing multifunctional organs interfaces between outside world.The importance extraembryonic tissues is particularly evident in animals that have adapted terrestrial life. For instance, amniotic vertebrates four amnion, chorion, allantois yolk sac, with each performing specialized, essential physiological functions. Terrestrial arthropods evolved other tissues, such as serosa amnion insects, which perform similar their vertebrate counterparts (e.g. drought resistance, embryonic tissue morphogenesis possibly management) innate immunity). Traditionally, were perceived only during embryogenesis, subsequently shed at birth or hatching.Under close scrutiny, however, embryonic–extraembryonic dichotomy far from straight-forward. boundaries are often ill-defined; fates so-called may not be entirely extraembryonic; physiological, biomechanical, morphogenetic signalling roles, regard development under-appreciated; evolutionary constraints conservation diversification poorly understood. Increasingly, molecular cellular evidence points toward certain arbitrariness making distinction tissues. Therefore, we feel it timely dedicate theme issue current understanding entities traditionally viewed extraembryonic.Our goal present raise awareness both interconnection well further studies ‘holistic' development.This features research articles complements panarthropods. Among them, eight focus mammalian Matsuo et al. [1] discuss developmental mechanical roles Reichert's membrane mice, non-cellular basal lamina separating trophectoderm parietal sac endoderm. Thowfeequ [2] idea shifting time space early mouse development. Pfeffer [3] hypothesizes connection cavitation epiblast loss Rauber's layer (polar trophoblast covering inner cell mass) mammals. Chowdhary Hadjantonakis [4] describe ontogeny specification primitive endoderm mice. Downs [5] examines embryogenesis Siriwardena [6] compare implantation different primate species suggest mechanisms controlling invasion depth provide new insights into human placental disorders. Chuva de Sousa Lopes [7] modes amniogenesis amniotes signatures ectoderm mesoderm Roelen [8] primordial germ boundary territories subsequent gonadal colonization.Extraembryonic non-mammalian additional papers. Concha Reig [9] give comprehensive overview origin, form, teleost structures, is, syncytial enveloping layer. Wen [10] investigate differences chorioallantoic live-bearing egg-laying lizards. Nagai [11] chick hypothesize evolutionarily conserved process underlying mesothelial fusion formation placenta eutherian Wittington [12] placentation vertebrates, reminding readers deep roots diverse strategies adopted groups fulfill needs.Extraembryonic Panarthropoda discussed five articles. Panfilio [13] anatomy, ontogeny, function, genetic regulation insects. Treffkorn [14] assess potential occurrence onychophorans (velvet worms) tardigrades (water bears), two invertebrate clades closely related arthropods. Prpic Pechmann [15] candidate spiders chelicerates. Jacob [16] immune hemimetabolous previously was known holometabolous Some flies, including fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster lack differentiated along its instead develop unique tissue, dubbed amnioserosa. Kwan [17] trace heritage examine how serosa-specific amnio-specific trajectories merged one D. melanogaster.These offer snapshot views intricacy complexity embryonic-extraembryonic crosstalk However, contrast development, concepts gastrulation, formation, dorsal-ventral anterior–posterior axis can broadly applied all metazoans, no unifying themes emerged We hope will encourage biologists work investigating questions regarding phylogeny application regenerative medicine. example, there common defining invertebrates? Do follow largely decoupled meet specific needs organisms development? Which panarthropods contribute cells fetus what cells? How involved patterning? chelicerates lasting tissue? What insect ventral (and cavity)? drove cyclorrhaphan flies? Does residual (dorsal) lower Cyclorrhapha drive same movements than amnioserosa? If so, does dorsal power processes?Finally, practical use knowledge model vitro reconstituting environment fetal–maternal interface, role usually fulfilled Currently, know relatively little about principles guide differentiation stem towards proper organization any tissue. spark discussions, debate collaborations within field, ultimately moving but still somewhat mysterious level.Data accessibilityThis has data.Authors' contributionsG.S.: writing—original writing—review editing; T.E.B.: U.S.-O.: S.S.: editing.All authors gave final approval publication agreed held accountable performed therein.Conflict interest declarationThis put together Guest Editor team under supervision journal's Editorial staff, following Royal Society's ethical codes best-practice guidelines. invited contributions handled process. Individual Editors assessing where they had personal, professional financial conflict described. Independent reviewers assessed Invitation did guarantee inclusion.FundingWe received funding study.FootnotesOne contribution 18 ‘Extraembryonic kingdom’.© 2022 Authors.Published Society terms Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, permits unrestricted use, provided source credited.References1. I, Kimura-Yoshida C, Ueda Y. 2022Developmental embryos. Phil. B 377, 20210257. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0257) Link, Scholar2. S, S. 2022Embryonic development: space. 20210255. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0255) Scholar3. PL. 2022Alternative leading gastrulation: losing polar (Rauber's layer) gaining cavity. 20210254. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0254) Scholar4. A-K. 2022Journey endoderm: maturation. 20210252. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0252) Scholar5. KM. 2022The allantois: interface. 20210251. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0251) Scholar6. D, TE. 2022Evolutionary divergence primates. 20210256. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0256) Scholar7. SM, BAJ, Lawson KA, Zwijsen A. mice amniotes. 20210258. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0258) Scholar8. SM. 2022Stay road: colonization 20210259. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0259) Scholar9. ML, G. 2022Origin, form structures fishes. 20210264. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0264) Scholar10. J, Ishihara T, Renfree MB, Griffith OW. 2022Comparing maternal–fetal oviparous viviparous 20210262. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0262) Scholar11. H, Tanoue Y, Nakamura Chan CJJ, Yamada Saitou M, Fukuda 2022Mesothelial mediates formation. 20210263. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0263) Scholar12. Whittington CM, Buddle AL, OW, Carter AM. specializations placentation. 20210261. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0261) Scholar13. extended analogy insects 20210268. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0268) Scholar14. Mayer G, Janssen 2022Review extra-embryonic closest arthropod relatives, tardigrades. 20210270. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0270) Scholar15. N-M, M. chelicerates: outlook. 20210269. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0269) Scholar16. Jacobs CGC, van der Hulst R, Chen Y-T, Williamson RP, Roth Zee M.2022Immune eggs. 20210266. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0266) Scholar17. U, CW. 2022How epithelia became one: Drosophila's 20210265. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0265) Next Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD FiguresRelatedReferencesDetails This Issue05 December 2022Volume 377Issue 1865Theme kingdom’ compiled edited Sheng, Boroviak, InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0250PubMed:36252213Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8436Online ISSN:1471-2970History: Manuscript received11/08/2022Manuscript accepted11/08/2022Published online17/10/2022Published print05/12/2022 License:© credited. impact Subjectsdevelopmental biologyevolutiongenetics
Язык: Английский