Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 26(2), С. 249 - 250
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
International Journal of Oral Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 8, 2024
Abstract The use of robots to augment human capabilities and assist in work has long been an aspiration. Robotics developing since the 1960s when first industrial robot was introduced. As technology advanced, robotic-assisted surgery shown numerous advantages, including more precision, efficiency, minimal invasiveness, safety than is possible with conventional techniques, which are research hotspots cutting-edge trends. This article reviewed history medical development seminal papers about current progress. Taking autonomous dental implant robotic system as example, advantages prospects systems would be discussed provide a reference for future research.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
22
International Dental Journal, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 75(3), С. 1608 - 1620
Опубликована: Март 26, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 26(6), С. 1149 - 1161
Опубликована: Авг. 19, 2024
Robot-assisted implant surgery has emerged as a novel digital technology, and the accuracy need further assessment.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
7
Clinical Oral Implants Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 6, 2025
ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the influence bone microstructure on accuracy robot‐assisted dental implant surgery. Materials and Methods This retrospective analyzed 52 patients who received surgery between January 2023 October 2023. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were used evaluate microstructural parameters, including volume (BV), tissue (TV), fraction (BV/TV), surface (BS), (BS/BV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), separation (Tb.Sp). Preoperative postoperative CBCT data accuracy, relationship parameters deviation platform deviation, apex angular statistically analyzed. Results In surgery, BS/BV a potential facilitator several deviations, while BV/TV Tb.Th inhibitors global respectively. Implant deviations divided into two groups large small by median, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that had largest area under ROC for predicting 0.711 ( p < 0.001), with an optimal cutoff value > 0.179, sensitivity specificity 70.37% 76.92%. Conclusion concluded might affect placement in robotic surgeries. Incorporating quality assessments preoperative planning may enhance precision outcomes procedures, highlighting further refinement robotic‐assisted techniques. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2400085813
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Март 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
BMC Oral Health, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 25(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 3, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
BMC Oral Health, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 25(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 11, 2025
To analyze the accuracy of robotic system in clinical studies and assess potential factors that might affect implant placement. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials were used to search for published from August 2014 till October 2024. Studies on computer-assisted surgery (R-CAIS) identified. Furthermore, manual searches performed selected journals. Only included. Subgroup analysis was based robot autonomy, different dentitions, working principle camera. Sixteen met inclusion criteria, evaluating 908 implants. The meta-analysis showed average global platform deviation, apex angular deviation 0.69 mm (95% CI: 0.61‒0.77, I2 = 94%), 0.72 0.64‒0.79, 93%), 1.62° 1.34°‒1.89°, 96%), respectively. In subgroup analysis, Meta-generic inverse variance observed statistically significant differences between robots using infrared mechanical tracking (p < 0.01), as well those visible light 0.01). No autonomous semi-active systems dentitions. R-CAIS technology demonstrated a high level accuracy. However, further large-scale, multi-center, randomized, controlled trials are necessary compare placement with other techniques, additional influencing must be explored.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 27(3)
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025
ABSTRACT The application of digital technology in implant dentistry refines prosthetically‐driven treatment planning by integrating virtual facial and intraoral models with cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This integration enables the development more personalized plans, ensures precise positioning, strengthens communication between clinicians patients, thereby reducing potential errors risks. Computer‐aided surgery consists two primary approaches: static‐guided surgery, which uses a physical surgical stent to guide osteotomy based on preoperatively planned position, dynamic‐guided employs an optical tracking system real‐time monitor display for visualization inside alveolar bone. Each approach offers distinct advantages poses unique clinical challenges. paper provides overview current applications literature computer‐aided discussing limitations each approach. Clinical cases are presented illustrate workflow highlight key considerations implementing these methods. Currently, use is rising, it essential strike balance precision practicality. future promising, generalized adoption anticipated.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 27(3)
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025
ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to compare the accuracy of an autonomous robotic system for anterior immediate and delayed implant placement. Methods retrospective included patients who underwent dental surgery from September 2022 March 2025 using system. Osteotomies performed with in this were modified by precision side‐cutting drills, along repeated lifting drills minimize deviations. Linear angular deviations two‐ three‐dimensional space assessed matching preoperative planning postoperative cone beam computed tomography. Postoperative pain surgical satisfaction recorded a 100‐mm visual analog scale. The Shapiro–Wilk test, Student's t ‐test, Mann–Whitney U Pearson's Chi‐Square Fisher's exact test used, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results 53 (65 implants) (immediate placement group: 19 patients, 21 implants; 34 44 implants). Comparison implantation showed mean (± SD) coronal deviation 0.57 ± 0.19 mm versus 0.49 0.20 ( = 0.129), apical 0.52 0.21 0.373), 0.53° 0.18° 0.61° 0.28° 0.742). not significantly different between two groups > 0.05). Conclusions demonstrated high comparable both implantation, overall patient satisfaction. could reduce technical sensitivity placement, enhance precision, broaden clinical applications
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 2, 2024
ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of and discrepancies between planned final implant positions using dynamic computer‐assisted surgery (d‐CAIS) autonomous robotic (r‐CAIS) in clinical practice. Materials Methods The included 83 patients, who received 135 implants December 2022 March 2024 (r‐CAIS group: 43 patients with 71 implants; d‐CAIS 40 64 implants). Cone‐beam computed tomography scans taken before after assessed linear angular deviations groups both 2D 3D spaces. duration was also analysed. Results deviation r‐CAIS 3.61° ± 1.65° versus 1.62° 0.93° ( p < 0.001), platform 1.12 0.51 mm 0.50 0.19 0.001) apex 1.36 0.57 0.58 0.21 0.001). group experienced significantly longer drilling placement times compared (10.6 3.8 vs. 8.3 3.4 min, 0.01), while preparation time showed no statistical difference (7.2 3.3 6.2 2.7 > 0.05). Conclusions system demonstrated higher accuracy than navigation partially edentulous patients.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3