Journal Of Clinical Periodontology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 2, 2024
ABSTRACT
Aim
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
efficiency
of
and
discrepancies
between
planned
final
implant
positions
using
dynamic
computer‐assisted
surgery
(d‐CAIS)
autonomous
robotic
(r‐CAIS)
in
clinical
practice.
Materials
Methods
The
included
83
patients,
who
received
135
implants
December
2022
March
2024
(r‐CAIS
group:
43
patients
with
71
implants;
d‐CAIS
40
64
implants).
Cone‐beam
computed
tomography
scans
taken
before
after
assessed
linear
angular
deviations
groups
both
2D
3D
spaces.
duration
was
also
analysed.
Results
deviation
r‐CAIS
3.61°
±
1.65°
versus
1.62°
0.93°
(
p
<
0.001),
platform
1.12
0.51
mm
0.50
0.19
0.001)
apex
1.36
0.57
0.58
0.21
0.001).
group
experienced
significantly
longer
drilling
placement
times
compared
(10.6
3.8
vs.
8.3
3.4
min,
0.01),
while
preparation
time
showed
no
statistical
difference
(7.2
3.3
6.2
2.7
>
0.05).
Conclusions
system
demonstrated
higher
accuracy
than
navigation
partially
edentulous
patients.
International Journal of Oral Science,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
16(1)
Опубликована: Апрель 8, 2024
Abstract
The
use
of
robots
to
augment
human
capabilities
and
assist
in
work
has
long
been
an
aspiration.
Robotics
developing
since
the
1960s
when
first
industrial
robot
was
introduced.
As
technology
advanced,
robotic-assisted
surgery
shown
numerous
advantages,
including
more
precision,
efficiency,
minimal
invasiveness,
safety
than
is
possible
with
conventional
techniques,
which
are
research
hotspots
cutting-edge
trends.
This
article
reviewed
history
medical
development
seminal
papers
about
current
progress.
Taking
autonomous
dental
implant
robotic
system
as
example,
advantages
prospects
systems
would
be
discussed
provide
a
reference
for
future
research.
Journal of Dental Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19(3), С. 1359 - 1368
Опубликована: Март 19, 2024
Robot-assisted
dental
surgery
has
gained
significant
attention
in
the
field
of
implant
therapy
as
an
alternative
to
conventional
free-hand
surgery.
It
addresses
challenges
faced
by
human
operators,
such
limited
visibility,
operator
fatigue,
and
lack
experience,
which
can
lead
errors.
Dental
robots
offer
improved
precision,
efficiency,
stability,
enhancing
accuracy
reducing
surgical
risks.
Accurate
placement
implants
is
crucial
avoid
complications
during
after
Robotic
guidance
provides
several
benefits.
Firstly,
robotic
arm
offers
haptic
feedback,
allowing
physical
when
placing
desired
position.
Secondly,
a
patient
tracker
integrated
into
system
monitors
movement
real-time
feedback
on
screen.
This
feature
ensures
that
surgeon
aware
any
changes
adjust
accordingly.
Lastly,
operates
under
human-robot
collaboration,
with
maintaining
control
oversight
throughout
procedure.
Therefore,
objective
current
study
review
robots,
well
efficiency
(e.g.
operation
preparation
time)
robot-assisted
procedures.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
26(2), С. 385 - 401
Опубликована: Янв. 12, 2024
Abstract
Objectives
To
assess
the
accuracy
of
autonomous
robotic
and
fully
guided
static
computer‐assisted
implant
surgery
(sCAIS)
performed
on
models
patients.
Materials
Methods
This
study
was
divided
into
in
vitro
vivo
sections.
In
vitro,
80
operators
were
assigned
to
two
groups
randomly.
Forty
forty
(ARI
group)
surgeries
remaining
carried
out
sCAIS
(FGI
maxillary
models,
respectively.
Each
operator
placed
an
one
model.
vivo,
60
patients
with
113
implants
from
2019
2023
group:
32
patients,
58
implants;
FGI
28
55
implants)
receiving
incorporated
this
retrospective
research.
The
preoperative
postoperative
cone
beam
computer
tomographs
(CBCTs)
utilized
estimate
linear
deviations
angular
two‐dimensional
(2D)
three‐dimensional
(3D)
space.
Pearson's
chi‐square
test,
Shapiro–Wilk
Student's
t
Mann–Whitney
U
test
mixed
applied,
p
<0.05
considered
statistically
significant.
Results
a
total
enrolled
significant
differences
found
between
(
<
0.001):
3D
deviation
at
platform
ARI
group
0.58
±
0.60
mm
1.50
1.46
mm,
respectively,
apex
1.78
1.35
angle
1.01
0.87°
2.93
1.59°,
Also,
except
for
mesiodistal
platform,
rest
significantly
lower
than
those
2D
space
0.001).
mean
(0.95
0.50°,
0.001)
both
(0.45
0.28
(0.47
observed
when
compared
(4.31
2.60°;
1.45
1.27
mm;
1.77
1.14
mm).
Conclusions
use
technology
showed
higher
sCAIS.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
15(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2025
This
study
assessed
the
accuracy
of
robotic
computer-aided
implant
surgery
(rCAIS)
in
partially
edentulous
patients
using
a
standard
operation
procedure.
Patients
who
underwent
placement
surgeries
system
under
procedure
were
recruited.
Deviations
dental
implants
calculated
after
superimposition
preoperative
and
postoperative
cone-beam
computed
tomography
(CBCT)
images.
The
possible
effects
regions
on
these
deviations
investigated.
A
total
30
participants
enrolled
44
inserted.
median
(25th-75th
percentile)
global
coronal
deviation,
apical
angular
deviation
0.62
mm
(0.46–1.00),
(0.49–1.01)
1.16
(0.69–1.69)
°,
respectively.
jaw
was
factor
lateral
coronal,
vertical
(P
<
0.05).
Both
greater
for
immediate
placements
than
delayed
dimensions
significantly
affected
These
results
indicate
that
rCAIS
based
is
safe
accurate
patients.
However,
there
remains
need
to
optimize
systems
simplify
workflow
improve
their
ability
recognize
respond
complex
bone
structures.
Further
clinical
studies
should
also
focus
comparing
long-term
success
rate
related
complications
with
traditional
approaches.
Clinical Oral Implants Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 3, 2025
To
assess
the
implant
accuracy,
safety,
and
efficiency
between
robotic-assisted
freehand
dental
placement
with
a
half-year
follow-up.
Patients
requiring
single-tooth
restorations
were
recruited
randomized
into
two
groups:
surgery
surgery.
The
accuracy
of
positioning
was
compared
by
assessing
immediate
postoperative
CBCT
scans
against
preoperative
planning
software.
Intraoperative
complications
recorded,
data
analyzed
using
an
intention-to-treat
approach.
time
required
for
in
each
group
documented.
A
6-month
follow-up
measured
survival
rates.
study
included
24
patients
(median
age
36,
18
female).
In
group,
average
platform
global
deviation,
apex
angular
deviation
0.70
±
0.11
mm,
0.12
1.09°
0.67°,
respectively.
these
measures
1.24
0.59
2.13
1.26
7.43°
6.12°,
respectively,
statistically
significant
differences.
Regarding
duration
surgery,
18.8
4.89
min.
similar
across
both
groups,
rate
100%
groups
at
This
found
that
robot-assisted
offers
higher
to
placement,
while
longer
operation
times.
Future
developments
should
focus
on
simplifying
registration
design
robot
systems
enhance
facilitate
their
broader
clinical
adoption.
Clinical Oral Implants Research,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
34(12), С. 1428 - 1437
Опубликована: Окт. 19, 2023
Abstract
Objectives
This
study
evaluated
the
accuracy
of
dental
implant
placement
using
robotic
computer‐assisted
surgery
(r‐CAIS)
technology
in
fully
edentulous
patients.
Materials
and
Methods
Fully
terminal
dentition
patients
were
enrolled
for
r‐CAIS
technology.
Based
on
cone‐beam
computed
tomography
(CBCT)
examination,
a
customized
positioning
marker
preoperative
surgical
plan
created
before
surgery.
During
surgery,
osteotomy
automatically
performed
an
autonomous
system
under
surgeon's
supervision.
A
postoperative
CBCT
scan
was
used
to
determine
discrepancies
between
planned
placed
implants.
Results
Ten
with
59
implants
underwent
No
adverse
events
occurred.
The
deviations
global
coronal,
apical,
angular
0.67
±
0.37
mm
(95%
CI:
0.58–0.77
mm),
0.69
0.59–0.78
1.27°
0.59°
1.42°–1.11°),
respectively.
Conclusions
proved
accurate
approach
due
control
deviation.
Autonomous
seems
promising
as
treating
However,
further
trials
are
required
provide
more
hard
clinical
evidence.
