Biological Conservation,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
261, С. 109224 - 109224
Опубликована: Июль 7, 2021
Tree
planting
is
both
a
promising
and
controversial
solution
to
climate
change
biodiversity
loss.
However,
this
controversy
largely
theoretical
because
we
lack
detailed
information
of
how
tree
proceeding
on-the-ground.
Here,
compiled
pantropical
dataset
174
organizations
determine
the
type
involved
in
planting,
their
geographic
locations
approaches.
We
found
that
number
have
increased
by
288%
past
30
years,
especially
for-profit
organizations.
These
reported
nearly
1.4
billion
trees
across
74
countries
since
1961.
Most
frequently
establishing
agroforestry
systems
or
mixed
species
single
plantations
using
assisted
natural
regeneration,
suggesting
programs
are
designed
support
local
communities
as
well
environmental
objectives.
Moreover,
most
were
commercial
utilitarian,
with
top
five
including
cacao,
teak,
moringa,
mango
coffee.
Finally,
despite
widespread
efforts
plant
more
trees,
there
was
pronounced
monitoring
on
websites
reports;
only
18%
mention
at
all,
5%
measuring
survival
rate
plantings.
Greater
transparency
greater
communication
needed
between
researchers
apply
effective
ways
restore
forest
cover.
Further,
while
often
aimed
counter
problems,
use
same
sets
commercially
useful
meet
economic
development
goals
global
indicates
need
for
coordination
among
avoid
biotic
homogenization.
arXiv (Cornell University),
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2021
AI
is
undergoing
a
paradigm
shift
with
the
rise
of
models
(e.g.,
BERT,
DALL-E,
GPT-3)
that
are
trained
on
broad
data
at
scale
and
adaptable
to
wide
range
downstream
tasks.
We
call
these
foundation
underscore
their
critically
central
yet
incomplete
character.
This
report
provides
thorough
account
opportunities
risks
models,
ranging
from
capabilities
language,
vision,
robotics,
reasoning,
human
interaction)
technical
principles(e.g.,
model
architectures,
training
procedures,
data,
systems,
security,
evaluation,
theory)
applications
law,
healthcare,
education)
societal
impact
inequity,
misuse,
economic
environmental
impact,
legal
ethical
considerations).
Though
based
standard
deep
learning
transfer
learning,
results
in
new
emergent
capabilities,and
effectiveness
across
so
many
tasks
incentivizes
homogenization.
Homogenization
powerful
leverage
but
demands
caution,
as
defects
inherited
by
all
adapted
downstream.
Despite
impending
widespread
deployment
we
currently
lack
clear
understanding
how
they
work,
when
fail,
what
even
capable
due
properties.
To
tackle
questions,
believe
much
critical
research
will
require
interdisciplinary
collaboration
commensurate
fundamentally
sociotechnical
nature.
Global Change Biology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
27(8), С. 1518 - 1546
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2021
Abstract
Nature‐based
solutions
(NbS)—solutions
to
societal
challenges
that
involve
working
with
nature—have
recently
gained
popularity
as
an
integrated
approach
can
address
climate
change
and
biodiversity
loss,
while
supporting
sustainable
development.
Although
well‐designed
NbS
deliver
multiple
benefits
for
people
nature,
much
of
the
recent
limelight
has
been
on
tree
planting
carbon
sequestration.
There
are
serious
concerns
this
is
distracting
from
need
rapidly
phase
out
use
fossil
fuels
protect
existing
intact
ecosystems.
also
expansion
forestry
framed
a
mitigation
solution
coming
at
cost
rich
biodiverse
native
ecosystems
local
resource
rights.
Here,
we
discuss
promise
pitfalls
framing
its
current
political
traction,
present
recommendations
how
get
message
right.
We
urge
policymakers,
practitioners
researchers
consider
synergies
trade‐offs
associated
follow
four
guiding
principles
enable
provide
society:
(1)
not
substitute
rapid
fuels;
(2)
wide
range
land
in
sea,
just
forests;
(3)
implemented
full
engagement
consent
Indigenous
Peoples
communities
way
respects
their
cultural
ecological
rights;
(4)
should
be
explicitly
designed
measurable
biodiversity.
Only
by
following
these
guidelines
will
design
robust
resilient
urgent
sustaining
nature
together,
now
into
future.
Global Change Biology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
27(7), С. 1328 - 1348
Опубликована: Янв. 25, 2021
Abstract
Urgent
solutions
to
global
climate
change
are
needed.
Ambitious
tree‐planting
initiatives,
many
already
underway,
aim
sequester
enormous
quantities
of
carbon
partly
compensate
for
anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions,
which
a
major
cause
rising
temperatures.
However,
tree
planting
that
is
poorly
planned
and
executed
could
actually
increase
emissions
have
long‐term,
deleterious
impacts
on
biodiversity,
landscapes
livelihoods.
Here,
we
highlight
the
main
environmental
risks
large‐scale
propose
10
golden
rules,
based
some
most
recent
ecological
research,
implement
forest
ecosystem
restoration
maximizes
rates
both
sequestration
biodiversity
recovery
while
improving
These
as
follows:
(1)
Protect
existing
first;
(2)
Work
together
(involving
all
stakeholders);
(3)
Aim
maximize
meet
multiple
goals;
(4)
Select
appropriate
areas
restoration;
(5)
Use
natural
regeneration
wherever
possible;
(6)
species
biodiversity;
(7)
resilient
plant
material
(with
genetic
variability
provenance);
(8)
Plan
ahead
infrastructure,
capacity
seed
supply;
(9)
Learn
by
doing
(using
an
adaptive
management
approach);
(10)
Make
it
pay
(ensuring
economic
sustainability
project).
We
focus
design
long‐term
strategies
tackle
crises
support
livelihood
needs.
emphasize
role
local
communities
sources
indigenous
knowledge,
benefits
they
derive
from
successful
reforestation
restores
functioning
delivers
diverse
range
products
services.
While
there
no
simple
universal
recipe
restoration,
crucial
build
upon
currently
growing
public
private
interest
in
this
topic,
ensure
interventions
provide
effective,
sinks
people.
Effective
policies
to
halt
biodiversity
loss
require
knowing
which
anthropogenic
drivers
are
the
most
important
direct
causes.
Whereas
previous
knowledge
has
been
limited
in
scope
and
rigor,
here
we
statistically
synthesize
empirical
comparisons
of
recent
driver
impacts
found
through
a
wide-ranging
review.
We
show
that
land/sea
use
change
dominant
worldwide.
Direct
exploitation
natural
resources
ranks
second
pollution
third;
climate
invasive
alien
species
have
significantly
less
than
top
two
drivers.
The
oceans,
where
dominate,
different
hierarchy
from
land
fresh
water.
It
also
varies
among
types
indicators.
For
example,
is
more
community
composition
changes
populations.
Stopping
global
requires
actions
tackle
all
major
their
interactions,
not
some
them
isolation.
Global Change Biology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
27(23), С. 6025 - 6058
Опубликована: Окт. 11, 2021
Land-based
climate
mitigation
measures
have
gained
significant
attention
and
importance
in
public
private
sector
policies.
Building
on
previous
studies,
we
refine
update
the
potentials
for
20
land-based
>200
countries
five
regions,
comparing
"bottom-up"
sectoral
estimates
with
integrated
assessment
models
(IAMs).
We
also
assess
implementation
feasibility
at
country
level.
Cost-effective
(available
up
to
$100/tCO2
eq)
is
8-13.8
GtCO2
eq
yr-1
between
2020
2050,
bottom
end
of
this
range
representing
IAM
median
upper
estimate.
The
cost-effective
estimate
about
40%
available
technical
potential
line
achieving
a
1.5°C
pathway
2050.
Compared
potentials,
represent
more
realistic
actionable
target
policy.
approximately
50%
from
forests
other
ecosystems,
35%
agriculture,
15%
demand-side
measures.
varies
sixfold
across
regions
assessed
(0.75-4.8
GtCO2eq
)
top
15
account
60%
global
potential.
Protection
ecosystems
present
particularly
high
efficiency,
provision
co-benefits,
relatively
lower
costs.
suggests
that
governance,
economic
investment,
socio-cultural
conditions
influence
likelihood
are
realized.
A
substantial
portion
(80%)
developing
LDCs,
where
barriers
greatest
concern.
Assisting
overcome
may
result
quantities
near-term,
low-cost
while
locally
important
adaptation
development
benefits.
Opportunities
among
vary
widely
depending
types
available,
their
co-benefits
risks,
feasibility.
Enhanced
investments
country-specific
plans
accommodate
complexity
urgently
needed
realize
large
improved
land
stewardship.
Journal of Applied Ecology,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
57(12), С. 2349 - 2361
Опубликована: Июль 27, 2020
Abstract
A
growing
number
of
initiatives
at
global,
regional
and
national
scales
propose
to
plant
millions,
billions
or
even
trillions
trees
as
a
simple
solution
resolve
complex
environmental
problems.
However,
tree
planting
is
much
more
complicated
than
it
seems.
We
summarize
the
multifaceted
decision‐making
process
needed
offer
guidelines
increase
success
proposed
ambitious
efforts
cover
world‐wide.
Given
varied
definitions
motivations
for
planting,
critical
that
stakeholders
work
together
clearly
define
biophysical
socioeconomic
goals
each
project.
Then
series
questions
must
be
addressed
about
where
how
(e.g.
vs.
allowing
natural
forest
regrowth)
most
effectively
achieve
these
minimize
unintended
negative
consequences,
well
how,
when
by
whom
will
evaluated.
Key
successfully
include:
(a)
first
addressing
underlying
drivers
deforestation;
(b)
integrating
across
from
local
global;
(c)
tailoring
strategies
stated
project
planning,
adaptively
managing
evaluating
over
sufficiently
long
timeframe;
(d)
focusing
on
ecosystem
whole,
not
just
trees;
(e)
coordinating
different
land
uses
(f)
involving
all
stages
planning
process.
Synthesis
applications
.
Tree
along
with
other
in
appropriate
locations
contexts,
can
make
valuable
contribution
ensuring
ecological
social
well‐being
our
planet
coming
decades,
but
only
if
are
considered
one
component
solutions
problems
carefully
planned,
implemented
monitored
time‐scale
stakeholder
engagement
broader
consideration
socio‐ecological
complexities.
Earth's
biodiversity
and
human
societies
face
pollution,
overconsumption
of
natural
resources,
urbanization,
demographic
shifts,
social
economic
inequalities,
habitat
loss,
many
which
are
exacerbated
by
climate
change.
Here,
we
review
links
among
climate,
biodiversity,
society
develop
a
roadmap
toward
sustainability.
These
include
limiting
warming
to
1.5°C
effectively
conserving
restoring
functional
ecosystems
on
30
50%
land,
freshwater,
ocean
"scapes."
We
envision
mosaic
interconnected
protected
shared
spaces,
including
intensively
used
strengthen
self-sustaining
the
capacity
people
nature
adapt
mitigate
change,
nature's
contributions
people.
Fostering
interlinked
human,
ecosystem,
planetary
health
for
livable
future
urgently
requires
bold
implementation
transformative
policy
interventions
through
institutions,
governance,
systems
from
local
global
levels.
Ecological Applications,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
31(8)
Опубликована: Авг. 2, 2021
We
review
science-based
adaptation
strategies
for
western
North
American
(wNA)
forests
that
include
restoring
active
fire
regimes
and
fostering
resilient
structure
composition
of
forested
landscapes.
As
part
the
review,
we
address
common
questions
associated
with
climate
realignment
treatments
run
counter
to
a
broad
consensus
in
literature.
These
following:
(1)
Are
effects
exclusion
overstated?
If
so,
are
unwarranted
even
counterproductive?
(2)
Is
forest
thinning
alone
sufficient
mitigate
wildfire
hazard?
(3)
Can
prescribed
burning
solve
problem?
(4)
Should
management,
including
thinning,
be
concentrated
wildland
urban
interface
(WUI)?
(5)
wildfires
on
their
own
do
work
fuel
treatments?
(6)
primary
objective
reduction
assist
future
firefighting
response
containment?
(7)
Do
under
extreme
weather?
(8)
scale
problem
too
great?
ever
catch
up?
(9)
Will
planting
more
trees
change
wNA
forests?
And
(10)
is
post-fire
management
needed
or
ecologically
justified?
Based
our
scientific
evidence,
range
proactive
actions
justified
necessary
keep
pace
changing
climatic
declining
heterogeneity
after
severe
wildfires.
Science-based
options
use
managed
wildfire,
burning,
coupled
mechanical
as
consistent
land
allocations
conditions.
Although
some
current
models
averse
short-term
risks
uncertainties,
long-term
environmental,
social,
cultural
consequences
primarily
grounded
suppression
well
documented,
highlighting
an
urgency
invest
intentional
restoration
regimes.
Understanding
the
dynamics
of
native
forest
loss
and
gain
is
critical
for
biodiversity
conservation
ecosystem
services,
especially
in
regions
experiencing
intense
transformations.
We
quantified
cover
on
an
annual
basis
from
1990
to
2017
Brazil’s
Atlantic
Forest.
Despite
relative
stability
during
this
period
(~28
Mha),
ongoing
older
forests,
mostly
flatter
terrains,
have
been
hidden
by
increasing
younger
cover,
marginal
lands
mechanized
agriculture.
Changes
its
spatial
distribution
increased
isolation
36.4%
landscapes.
The
clearance
forests
associated
with
recut
27%
has
resulted
a
progressive
rejuvenation
cover.
highlight
need
include
spatiotemporal
into
restoration
programs
better
estimate
their
expected
benefits
unexpected
problems.