Open Book Publishers,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. 215 - 240
Опубликована: Окт. 16, 2024
Lavinia
Marin
draws
from
phenomenology
to
lay
bare
another
aspect
of
the
ubiquitous
presence
social
media.
By
taking
attention
as
a
starting-point,
she
show
that
is
–
rather
than
only
scare
resource
analysts
departing
perspective
economy
would
have
it
foundational
for
our
moral
relations
other
beings.
She
argues
there
distinctive
form
other-oriented
enables
us
perceive
beings
living
are
worthy
care.
This
mode
presupposes
affectivity
and
involves
recognition
being
capable
forming
judgments,
well
someone
having
certain
vulnerabilities.
Her
analysis
shows
by
prioritizing
homogenous
interactions
standardization,
media
platforms
hinder
engaging
in
this
attention,
thereby
undermining
capacity
recognizing
others
surprising,
changing,
fallible
Technology in Society,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
67, С. 101750 - 101750
Опубликована: Сен. 23, 2021
Scholarly
discourse
on
"disruptive
technologies"
has
been
strongly
influenced
by
disruptive
innovation
theory.
This
theory
is
tailored
for
analyzing
disruptions
in
markets
and
business.
It
of
limited
use,
however,
the
broader
social,
moral
existential
dynamics
technosocial
disruption.
Yet
these
should
be
great
scholarly
concern,
both
coming
to
terms
with
technological
past
those
our
current
age.
Technologies
can
disrupt
social
relations,
institutions,
epistemic
paradigms,
foundational
concepts,
values,
even
nature
human
cognition
experience
–
domains
disruption
that
are
largely
neglected
existing
technologies.
Accordingly,
this
paper
seeks
reorient
discussion
around
a
notion
raises
three
questions.
First,
how
conceptualized
way
clearly
sets
it
apart
from
framework?
Secondly,
does
relate
concordant
notions
"disruptor"
"disruptiveness"?
Thirdly,
we
advance
criteria
assess
"degree
disruptiveness"
different
technologies?
The
clarifies
questions
proposes
an
answer
each
them.
In
doing
so,
advances
"technosocial
disruption"
as
key
analysandum
future
scholarship
interactions
between
technology
society.
Technology in Society,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
74, С. 102327 - 102327
Опубликована: Июль 18, 2023
Modern
technologies
like
artificial
intelligence,
robotics,
geo-engineering,
social
media,
or
next-generation
genomics
have
been
and
will
continue
to
be
socially
(culturally,
economically,
legally,
etc.)
disruptive.
Several
philosophers
of
technology
noted
that
is
not
only
but
also
conceptually
Technologies
do
change
the
way
we
live
together.
They
challenge
conceptualize
classify
ourselves
world
around
us.
However,
it
clear
what
means
for
disrupt
our
concepts,
as
very
idea
conceptual
disruption
its
relation
remain
opaque.
In
can
concepts
how
overcome
such
disruptions?
This
paper
proposes
a
framework
studying
technology-induced
disruptions
draws
both
on
mediation
theory
recent
work
engineering.
Philosophy & Technology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
36(4)
Опубликована: Окт. 18, 2023
Abstract
Conceptual
Engineering
(CE)
is
thought
to
be
generally
aimed
at
ameliorating
deficient
concepts.
In
this
paper,
we
challenge
assumption:
argue
that
CE
frequently
undertaken
with
the
orthogonal
aim
of
conceptual
adaptation
.
We
develop
thesis
reference
interplay
between
technology
and
Emerging
technologies
can
exert
significant
pressure
on
systems
spark
‘conceptual
disruption’.
For
example,
advances
in
Artificial
Intelligence
raise
question
whether
AIs
are
agents
or
mere
objects,
which
construed
as
a
regarding
concepts
AGENT
OBJECT.
distinguish
three
types
disruption
(conceptual
gaps,
overlaps,
misalignments)
when
occurs
address
these
disruptions,
its
primary
not
improve
concepts,
but
retain
their
functional
quality,
prevent
them
from
degrading.
This
characteristic
philosophy
technology:
preserve
role
concept
scheme,
rather
than
improving
how
fulfills
respective
function.
Philosophy & Technology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
37(2)
Опубликована: Март 20, 2024
Abstract
With
robots
increasingly
integrated
into
various
areas
of
life,
the
question
relationships
with
them
is
gaining
prominence.
Are
friendship
and
partnership
possible?
While
there
already
extensive
research
on
robots,
this
article
critically
examines
whether
relationship
non-human
entities
sufficiently
explored
a
deeper
level,
especially
in
terms
ethical
concepts
such
as
autonomy,
agency,
responsibility.
In
robot
ethics,
considerations
often
presuppose
properties
consciousness,
sentience,
intelligence,
which
are
exclusively
aligned
humans.
I
will
challenge
understanding
these
by
anchoring
contexts,
bodies,
actions.
This
approach
allows
to
consider
specific
ways
being
human
identify
well.
My
“eco-relational”
posits
that
it
crucial
relationality
animals
technology
central
from
beginning.
reflects
“eco”,
entire
house
we
live
including
robots.
To
support
this,
examine
two
dominant
approaches
ethics
within
contemporary
Western
tradition:
“properties
approach”
modestly
relational
approaches.
develop
an
eco-relational
alternative.
Employing
phenomenological
method,
demonstrate
through
examples
our
actions
inherently
connected
entities.
show
play
role
actions,
leading
hybrid
agency.
It
becomes
clear
disrupt
traditional
concepts.
Ethics and Information Technology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
26(1)
Опубликована: Март 1, 2024
Abstract
Recent
work
on
philosophy
of
technology
emphasises
the
ways
in
which
can
disrupt
our
concepts
and
conceptual
schemes.
We
analyse
challenge
existing
accounts
disruption,
criticising
views
according
to
disruption
be
understood
terms
uncertainty
for
application,
as
well
assuming
all
instances
occur
at
same
level.
proceed
provide
own
account
an
interruption
normal
functioning
Moreover,
we
offer
a
multilevel
taxonomy
thereof,
where
distinguish
between
disruptions
occurring
different
levels
(conceptual
scheme,
clusters,
individual
concepts),
taking
forms
gaps
conflicts),
leading
degrees
severity
(extending
from
mild
severe).
also
detailed
through
historical
examples
how
conflicts
times
very
process
disruption.
Finally,
make
case
that
kinds
engineering
meaningful
assess
overcome
distinct
types
Technology in Society,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
72, С. 102160 - 102160
Опубликована: Ноя. 5, 2022
New
technologies
have
the
potential
to
severely
“challenge”
or
“disrupt”
not
only
our
established
social
practices
but
most
fundamental
concepts
and
distinctions
like
person
versus
object
,
nature
artificial
being
dead
alive
.
But
does
this
disruption
also
change
these
concepts?
Or
it
merely
operationalizations
applications
of
same
In
paper,
I
argue
that
instead
focusing
on
individual
conceptual
change,
philosophers
socially
disruptive
(SDTs)
should
think
about
as
a
network
cluster
interrelated
concepts.
What
really
generates
are
changes
inferential
relations
between
–
whether
entails
respective
Philosophers
therefore
in
privileged
position
able
avoid
commitments
regarding
individuation
•
Explores
an
important
aspect
thriving
research
program.
Develops
defense
one
its
serious
challenges.
Leads
way
developing
more
principled
language
methodology
for
Abstract
Considerable
progress
is
being
made
in
robotics,
with
robots
developed
for
many
different
areas
of
life:
there
are
service
robots,
industrial
transport
medical
household
sex
exploration
military
and
more.
As
robot
development
advances,
an
intriguing
question
arises:
should
also
encompass
religious
functions?
Religious
could
be
used
practices,
education,
discussions,
ceremonies
within
buildings.
This
article
delves
into
two
pivotal
questions,
combining
perspectives
from
philosophy
studies:
can
have
Section
2
initiates
the
discourse
by
introducing
discussing
relationship
between
religion.
The
core
(developed
Sects.
3
4)
scrutinizes
fundamental
questions:
possess
functions,
they?
After
exhaustive
discussion
arguments,
benefits,
potential
objections
regarding
Sect.
5
addresses
lingering
ethical
challenges
that
demand
attention.
6
presents
a
findings,
outlines
limitations
this
study,
ultimately
responds
to
dual
research
question.
Based
on
study’s
results,
brief
criteria
deployment
proposed,
serving
as
guidelines
future
research.
7
concludes
offering
insights
avenues
further
