9. Attending to the Online Other: A Phenomenology of Attention on Social Media Platforms DOI Creative Commons
Lavinia Marin

Open Book Publishers, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 215 - 240

Опубликована: Окт. 16, 2024

Lavinia Marin draws from phenomenology to lay bare another aspect of the ubiquitous presence social media. By taking attention as a starting-point, she show that is – rather than only scare resource analysts departing perspective economy would have it foundational for our moral relations other beings. She argues there distinctive form other-oriented enables us perceive beings living are worthy care. This mode presupposes affectivity and involves recognition being capable forming judgments, well someone having certain vulnerabilities. Her analysis shows by prioritizing homogenous interactions standardization, media platforms hinder engaging in this attention, thereby undermining capacity recognizing others surprising, changing, fallible

Язык: Английский

Why you Should not use CI to Evaluate Socially Disruptive Technology DOI Creative Commons
Alexandra Prégent

Philosophy & Technology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 38(1)

Опубликована: Янв. 14, 2025

Abstract Contextual Integrity (CI) is built to assess potential privacy violations of new sociotechnical systems and practices. It does so by evaluating their respect for the context-relative informational norms at play in a given context. But can CI evaluate that severely disrupt established social practices? In this paper, I argue that, while claims be able all practices, it cannot ones cause severe changes disruptions values These types technology are known as socially disruptive technologies (SDTs) paper argues they beyond CI’s scope. follows best, assessment those would useless and, worst, lead harm, including failure identify unwarranted legitimisation privacy-threatening technology. Government actors, policymakers, academics should refrain from relying on type

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Conceptual Mediation in Technomoral Change: Reply to Danaher and Sætra DOI Creative Commons
Jeroen Hopster, Jon Rueda,

Robin Hillenbrink

и другие.

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 27, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Tentative governance: An exploration of ethical governance strategies for emerging science and technology DOI Creative Commons

Xue Yu,

Wang Qian

Cultures of Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Янв. 26, 2025

It has become a consensus that the benign development of emerging science and technology (S&T) urgently needs support an ethical governance framework. At present, there are three focal points in construction S&T system: risk governance, agile global governance. The analysis these concerns this study shows still some practical problems, such as insufficient emergency capacity, low efficiency weak cooperation capacity. Tentative strategies for helpful to solve problems. characterized by cautious, dynamic, flexible progressive approaches, adopting both top-down bottom-up methods paying special attention early warnings, feedback adjustment seek best results. process is more suitable ‘upstream’ stage S&T. As response uncertainty, tentative can help improve system However, also have so need wisdom, balancing flexibility stability, considering temporary long-term factors, coordinating localization globalization.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Persons, Unique Value and Avatars DOI Creative Commons
Paula Sweeney

Minds and Machines, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 35(2)

Опубликована: Фев. 28, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
AI and the Disruption of Personhood DOI
Anna Puzio

Oxford University Press eBooks, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 19, 2025

Abstract The new avatars and bots modeled after humans, the large language models (LLMs) with a “persona,” seemingly autonomously acting robots raise question of whether AI technologies can also possess personhood or at least be part our personhood. Do we extend through living death in digital realm? This article explores application moral concept to technologies. It presents twofold thesis: first, it illustrates, various examples, how is being disrupted context Second, discusses potential evolution argues for abandoning ethics, based on reasons such as its vagueness, harmful discriminatory character, disconnection from society. Finally, outlines future perspectives approaches moving forward, emphasizing need conceptual justice concepts.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Artefacts of Change: The Disruptive Nature of Humanoid Robots Beyond Classificatory Concerns DOI Creative Commons
Cindy Friedman

Science and Engineering Ethics, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 31(2)

Опубликована: Март 28, 2025

Abstract One characteristic of socially disruptive technologies is that they have the potential to cause uncertainty about application conditions a concept i.e., are conceptually disruptive. Humanoid robots done just this, as evidenced by discussions whether, and under what conditions, humanoid could be classified as, for example, moral agents, patients, or legal and/or persons. This paper frames effect differently taking discussion beyond classificatory concerns. It does so showing because also transform how we experience understand world. Through inviting us relate technological artefact if it human, profound impact upon way in which different elements our Specifically, I focus on three types human relational experiences, norms surround them may transformed robots: (1) human-technology relations; (2) human-human (3) human-self relations. Anticipating ways change society important given once technology entrenched, difficult counteract negative impacts. Therefore, should try anticipate while can still do something prevent them. Since currently relatively rudimentary, yet there incentive invest more their development, now good time think carefully this us.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice DOI Creative Commons
Jeroen Hopster

Ethics and Information Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 26(1)

Опубликована: Фев. 27, 2024

Abstract Recent scholarship on technology-induced ‘conceptual disruption’ has spotlighted the notion of a conceptual gap. Conceptual gaps have also been discussed in epistemic injustice, yet up until now these bodies work remained disconnected. This article shows that ‘gaps’ interest to both literature are closely related, and argues joint examination disruption injustice is fruitful for fields. I argue hermeneutical marginalization—a skewed division resources, which serves diminish experiences marginalized folk—does not only transpire because gaps, but two other kinds disruption: overlaps misalignments. Hence, there multiple can be usefully studied through normative lens injustice. Technology play different roles vis-a-vis injustices, as causal trigger disruption, mediator resources. Its role normatively significant, particular socially disruptive technologies implications groups: they may amplify resources some groups, while diminishing those others.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3
Take five? A coherentist argument why medical AI does not require a new ethical principle DOI
Seppe Segers, Michiel De Proost

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 45(5), С. 387 - 400

Опубликована: Июнь 8, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3
A sociotechnical system perspective on AI DOI Creative Commons
Olya Kudina,

Ibo van de Poel

Minds and Machines, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 34(3)

Опубликована: Июнь 12, 2024

The aim of this special issue is to provide a sociotechnical system perspective on Artificial Intelligence (AI).Discussions AI still often focus the technology itself rather than broader systems in which it functions.This even true when comes social and ethical issues raised by AI.For example, people talk about fair algorithms or explainable AI, as if fairness explainability depend solely not also technologies are embedded.Consider, for an algorithm that used government agency find potential cases fraud with welfare.Fairness case no doubt partly depends itself; example does meet certain metrics they have now been proposed literature (e.g., Mehrabi et al., 2019)?However, there multiple conflicting metrics, order decide these focus, one first needs know more context: what main unfairness might occur context?Which most vulnerable dependent governmental decisions should be protected from unfair decisions?Even choice based contextual considerations, will make resulting necessarily fair.That depend, behavior civil servants politicians, political climate respect fraud, internal rules relevant agency.Is room deviate algorithm's advice?Is emphasis finding avoiding unjust accusations?Are citizens offered possibility object decision additional evidence needed?Also legal institutions affect functioning embedded.For independent possibilities appeal against advice?

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2
The entangled human being – a new materialist approach to anthropology of technology DOI Creative Commons
Anna Puzio

AI and Ethics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 2, 2024

Abstract Technological advancements raise anthropological questions: How do humans differ from technology? Which human capabilities are unique? Is it possible for robots to exhibit consciousness or intelligence, capacities once taken be exclusively human? Despite the evident need an lens in both societal and research contexts, philosophical anthropology of technology has not been established as a set discipline with defined theories, especially concerning emerging technologies. In this paper, I will utilize New Materialist approach, focusing particularly on theories Donna Haraway Karen Barad, explore their potential technology. aim develop techno-anthropological approach that is informed enriched by Materialism. This characterized its relational perspective, dynamic open conception being, attention diversity dynamics power knowledge production ontology, emphasis non-human. outline centered Materialism, wherein focus, paradoxically, but equally non-human entities entanglement As become clear, way we understand relationship fundamental our concepts ethics

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2