PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
16(5), С. e0251984 - e0251984
Опубликована: Май 19, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
a
significant
influence
on
the
lives
of
people
around
world
and
could
be
risk
factor
for
mental
health
diseases.
This
study
aimed
to
explore
psychological
impact
by
identifying
patterns
related
post-traumatic
symptoms
considering
personality
defensive
styles.
Specifically,
it
was
hypothesized
that
neuroticism
negatively
associated
with
event,
as
opposed
extraversion,
agreeableness,
conscientiousness,
openness
traits.
mediation
role
mature,
neurotic,
immature
defenses
in
these
relationships
also
investigated.
involved
557
Italian
individuals
(71.3%
women,
28.7%
men;
M
age
=
34.65,
SD
12.05),
who
completed
an
online
survey
including
Impact
Event
Scale—Revised,
Forty
Item
Defense
Style
Questionnaire
(DSQ-40)
Ten
Personality
Inventory.
Results
showed
nonsignificant
effect
extraversion
event.
negative
instead
confirmed
partial
parallel
involving
effects
from
neurotic
indirect
path.
Finally,
agreeableness
conscientiousness
delineated
two
protective
pathways
regarding
determining
total
models
which
both
traits
were
styles,
positively
mature
defenses.
These
findings
provide
exploration
symptom
during
pandemic,
big
five
defense
mechanisms.
results
may
useful
developing
interventions,
treatments,
prevention
activities.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
9
Опубликована: Май 7, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
an
unprecedented
impact
on
health
systems
in
most
countries,
and
particular,
the
mental
well-being
of
workers
frontlines
response
efforts.
purpose
this
article
is
to
provide
evidence-based
overview
adverse
impacts
healthcare
during
times
crisis
other
challenging
working
conditions
highlight
importance
prioritizing
protecting
workforce,
particularly
context
pandemic.
First,
we
a
broad
elevated
risk
stress,
burnout,
moral
injury,
depression,
trauma,
challenges
among
workers.
Second,
consider
how
public
emergencies
exacerbate
these
concerns,
as
reflected
emerging
research
negative
Further,
potential
approaches
for
overcoming
threats
by
exploring
value
practicing
self-care
strategies,
implementing
evidence
based
interventions
organizational
measures
help
protect
support
workforce.
Lastly,
systemic
changes
empower
their
long
run,
propose
policy
recommendations
guide
leaders
endeavor.
This
paper
acknowledges
stressors,
burdens,
psychological
needs
workforce
across
disciplines,
calls
renewed
efforts
mitigate
those
such
EClinicalMedicine,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
35, С. 100879 - 100879
Опубликована: Май 1, 2021
COVID-19
has
put
extraordinary
stress
on
healthcare
workers.
Few
studies
have
evaluated
by
worker
role,
or
focused
experiences
of
women
and
people
color.The
"Coping
with
COVID"
survey
assessed
US
stress.
A
summary
score
(SSS)
incorporated
stress,
fear
exposure,
anxiety/depression
workload
(Omega
0.78).
Differences
from
mean
were
expressed
as
Cohen's
d
Effect
Sizes
(ESs).
Regression
analyses
tested
associations
burnout.Between
May
28
October
1,
2020,
20,947
workers
responded
42
organizations
(median
response
rate
20%,
Interquartile
range
7%
to
35%).
Sixty
one
percent
reported
exposure
transmission,
38%
anxiety/depression,
43%
suffered
work
overload,
49%
had
burnout.
Stress
scores
highest
among
nursing
assistants,
medical
social
(small
moderate
ESs,
p
<
0.001),
inpatient
vs
outpatient
ES,
men
in
Black
Latinx
Whites
0.001).
Fear
was
prevalent
assistants
workers,
while
housekeepers
most
often
experienced
enhanced
meaning
purpose.
In
multilevel
models,
odds
burnout
40%
lower
those
feeling
valued
their
(odds
ratio
0.60,
95%
CIs
[0.58,
0.63],
p<
0.001).Stress
is
higher
persons
color,
related
mental
health,
when
valued.
Current Medical Research and Opinion,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
37(12), С. 2151 - 2161
Опубликована: Сен. 9, 2021
Objective
This
study
synthesized
evidence
regarding
the
prevalence
of
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
in
United
States
(US).Methods
A
systematic
literature
review
(SLR)
identified
recently
published
(2015–2019)
observational
studies
PTSD
US
via
MEDLINE,
EMBASE,
and
PsycINFO
databases.
Eligible
studies'
most
recent
data
were
collected
no
earlier
than
2013.
Data
elements
extracted
included
design,
sample
size,
location,
source/year(s),
population(s),
traumatic
event
type,
prevalance
estimates
with
corresponding
look-back
periods,
clinical
metrics.Results
from
38
articles
categorized
by
population,
diagnostic
criteria,
lookback
period.
Among
civilians,
point
ranged
8.0%
to
56.7%,
1-year
2.3%
9.1%,
lifetime
3.4%
26.9%.
In
military
populations,
1.2%
87.5%,
6.7%
50.2%,
7.7%
17.0%.
Within
these
ranges,
several
derived
relatively
high
quality
data;
are
highlighted
review.
Prevalence
was
elevated
subpopulations
including
emergency
responders,
refugees,
American
Indian/Alaska
Natives,
individuals
heavy
substance
use,
a
past
suicide
attempt,
trans-masculine
individuals,
women
prior
sexual
trauma.
Female
sex,
lower
income,
younger
age,
behavioral
health
conditions
as
risk
factors
for
PTSD.Conclusions
varied
widely,
partly
due
different
designs,
methodologies,
nationally
representative
lacking.
Efforts
increase
screening
improve
disease
awareness
may
allow
better
detection
management
PTSD.
Psychological Medicine,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
51(6), С. 881 - 893
Опубликована: Март 2, 2021
Abstract
Background
COVID-19
physical
distancing
measures
can
potentially
increase
the
likelihood
of
mental
disorders.
It
is
unknown
whether
these
are
associated
with
depression
and
anxiety.
Objectives
To
investigate
meta-analytic
global
levels
anxiety
during
pandemic
how
implementation
mitigation
strategies
(i.e.
public
transportation
closures,
stay-at-home
orders,
etc.)
impacted
such
Data
sources
PubMed,
MEDLINE,
Web
Science,
BIOSIS
Citation
Index,
Current
Content
Connect,
PsycINFO,
CINAHL,
medRxiv,
PsyArXiv
databases
for
prevalences;
Oxford
Covid-19
Government
Response
Tracker
containment
closure
policies
indexes;
Global
Burden
Disease
Study
previous
eligibility
criteria
Original
studies
conducted
pandemic,
which
assessed
categorical
anxiety,
using
PHQ-9
GAD-7
scales
(cutoff
⩾10).
Participants
interventions
General
population,
healthcare
providers,
students,
patients.
National
measures.
appraisal
synthesis
methods
Meta-analysis
meta-regression.
Results
In
total,
226
638
individuals
were
within
60
included
studies.
prevalence
both
was
24.0%
21.3%,
respectively.
There
differences
in
reported
across
regions
countries.
Asia
(17.6%
17.9%),
China
(16.2%
15.5%)
especially,
had
lowest
Regarding
impact
on
health,
only
closures
increased
especially
Europe.
Limitations
Country-level
data
anxiety/depression
may
not
necessarily
reflect
local
city-specific)
contexts.
Conclusions
implications
key
findings
Mental
health
concerns
should
be
viewed
as
a
delayed
consequence
but
also
concurrent
epidemic.
Our
provide
support
policy-makers
to
consider
real-time
enhanced
services,
initiatives
foster
positive
outcomes.
Emerging
cross-sectional
data
indicate
that
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
in
the
COVID-19
era
face
particular
mental
health
risks.
Moral
injury
-
a
betrayal
of
one's
values
and
beliefs,
is
potential
concern
for
HCWs
who
witness
devastating
impact
acute
illness
while
too
often
feeling
helpless
to
respond.
This
study
longitudinally
examined
rates
depression,
generalized
anxiety
disorder
(GAD),
posttraumatic
stress
(PTSD),
moral
among
United
States
era.
We
anticipated
finding
high
levels
clinical
symptoms
would
remain
stable
over
time.
also
expected
find
positive
correlations
between
injury.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
11
Опубликована: Дек. 8, 2020
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
healthcare
workers
in
Italy
have
been
exposed
to
an
unprecedented
pressure
and
traumatic
events.
However,
no
direct
comparison
with
general
population
is
available
so
far.
The
aim
of
this
study
detail
mental
health
outcomes
compared
population.
Prior
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
physicians
experienced
unprecedented
levels
of
burnout.
The
uncertainty
ongoing
pandemic
along
with
increased
workload
and
difficult
medical
triage
decisions
may
lead
a
further
decline
in
physician
psychological
health.We
searched
Medline,
EMBASE,
PsycINFO
for
primary
research
from
database
inception
(Medline
[1946],
EMBASE
[1974],
[1806])
November
17,
2020.
Titles
abstracts
were
screened
by
one
three
reviewers
full-text
article
screening
data
abstraction
conducted
independently,
duplicate,
reviewers.From
6223
unique
citations,
480
articles
reviewed
full-text,
193
studies
(of
90,499
physicians)
included
final
review.
Studies
reported
on
symptoms
management
during
seven
infectious
disease
outbreaks
(severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
[SARS],
strains
Influenza
A
virus
[H1N1,
H5N1,
H7N9],
Ebola,
Middle
East
[MERS],
COVID-19)
57
countries.
Psychological
anxiety
(14.3-92.3%),
stress
(11.9-93.7%),
depression
(17-80.5%),
post-traumatic
disorder
(13.2-75.2%)
burnout
(14.7-76%)
commonly
among
physicians,
regardless
outbreak
or
country.
Younger,
female
(vs.
male),
single
married),
early
career
those
providing
direct
care
infected
patients
associated
worse
symptoms.Physicians
should
be
aware
that
anxiety,
depression,
fear
distress
are
common,
manifest
differently
self-management
strategies
improve
well-being
exist.
Health
systems
implement
short
long-term
supports
caring
COVID-19.
Australian Journal of Rural Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
29(5), С. 753 - 767
Опубликована: Сен. 29, 2021
To
investigate
the
impact
of
COVID-19
on
mental
health
and
well-being
rural
paramedics,
police,
community
nursing
child
protection
staff.An
online
survey
was
distributed
to
sources
stress
support
across
individual,
task
organisational
domains.The
completed
by
1542
nurses
workers
from
all
states
territories
Australia.
This
study
describes
data
for
632
participants.The
main
measures
were
Public
Health
Questionnaire
(PHQ9),
Generalised
Anxiety
Disorder
(GAD7),
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory
(MBI),
workplace
engagement,
intention
quit
COVID-19-related
stress.The
mean
depression
anxiety
scores
8.2
(PHQ9)
6.8
(GAD7).
is
2-3
times
that
found
in
general
community.
Over
half
(56.1%)
respondents
showed
high
emotional
exhaustion
(burnout).
The
exhaustion,
depersonalisation
personal
accomplishment
28.5,
9.3
34.2,
respectively.
strongest
associations
with
burnout
psychological
distress
workload,
provision
practical
support,
training
communication.
A
significant
proportion
seriously
considering
quitting
(27.4%)
or
looking
a
new
job
different
employer
(28.5%)
next
12
months.COVID-19
has
increased
workload
front-line
staff.
major
related
organisations'
responses
not
per
se.
suggest
most
effective
interventions
are
preventive,
such
as
firstly
ensuring
fair
reasonable
workloads.