Critical discourse on GMO agripreneurship for global food security: bridging agricultural colonialism and food sovereignty perspectives
International Journal of Ethics and Systems,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Май 9, 2025
Purpose
Despite
a
number
of
studies
on
genetically
modified
organisms
(GMOs),
very
few
them
reconcile
debates
between
pro-GMO
agripreneurs
and
anti-GMO
activists
for
food
security.
This
study
aims
to
examine
the
role
GMO
agripreneurship
global
security
while
also
bridging
contrasting
perspectives
agricultural
colonialism
sovereignty.
Design/methodology/approach
The
applies
critical
discourse
analysis
(CDA)
analyse
how
impacts
supply
chain.
required
primary
data,
including
comparative
cases
from
10
countries
adoption
rejection,
were
obtained
45
articles
texts
published
2000
2024,
following
five
steps
CDA.
seven-dimensional
CDA
analytical
framework
was
used
uncover
hidden
socio-economic
GMOs
marginalised
communities
Findings
identifies
main
findings
agripreneurship.
First,
agripreneurs,
corporations
institutions
in
Global
North
drive
enhance
but
face
opposition
owing
misinformation.
Second,
creates
economic
dependency
by
monopolising
seed
production,
forcing
small
farmers
buy
patented
seeds.
Third,
it
undermines
traditional
farming
promoting
mono-cultures,
reducing
biodiversity
harming
ecosystems
through
centralisation
chains,
which
weakens
sovereignty
displaces
farmers.
Fourth,
ethical,
social
concerns
arise,
requiring
community-led
solutions.
Finally,
agroecological
is
proposed
as
balanced
approach
integrating
local
autonomy,
sustainable
trade
agroecology.
Research
limitations/implications
merely
focuses
synthesising
existing
research
limited
high-quality
does
not
provide
empirical
tests
or
region-specific
insights
into
trade-offs
Practical
implications
provides
actionable
policymakers,
practitioners
researchers
advocating
models,
supporting
practices
rethinking
intellectual
property
laws
that
perpetuate
inequalities
Originality/value
Unlike
previous
studies,
this
advances
proposing
hybrid
balances
decolonisation,
policies
innovations,
offering
viable
midpoint
Язык: Английский
Genetically Modified Foods: Victoria Islanders’ Perspectives on the Common Good
Опубликована: Июль 5, 2024
Rationale:
Genetically
modified
(GM)
foods
have
the
potential
to
reduce
food
insecurity
and
address
economic
environmental
issues.
Despite
these
benefits,
GM
continue
face
significant
criticism
there
is
limited
information
on
public
awareness
understanding
of
their
nutritional
health
benefits
in
Nigeria.
This
study
aims
fill
this
gap
by
investigating
knowledge
perceptions
Victoria
Island,
Lagos.
Methods:
A
convenience
sampling
method
was
used
recruit
369
respondents
from
Data
were
gathered
using
a
structured
questionnaire.
The
target
population
comprised
employed
adults
either
residing
or
working
Island.
Statistical
analyses
conducted
examine
relationship
between
sociodemographic
factors
foods.
Results:
found
that
majority
(62.9%,
n=232)
knowledgeable
about
associated
However,
many
believed
community
not
well-informed
topic.
Awareness
significantly
with
such
as
marital
status
education
(P<0.01).
Most
foods,
61.8%
believing
production
could
sustainably
reliance
chemical
pesticides,
fertilizers,
other
energy
inputs,
thus
mitigating
ecological
impacts.
Additionally,
most
did
feel
purchasing
consuming
conflicted
beliefs
would
affect
choices.
Conclusion:
concludes
while
individual
relatively
high,
perception
low.
Sociodemographic
play
role
shaping
Recommendations:
includes
government
should
actively
educate
any
safety
concerns;
Implement
strict
border
controls
labeling
for
products
protect
consumer
rights
preferences
organic
provide
sufficient
technical
financial
assistance
farmers
who
participate
seed
programs
enhance
national
security.
Significant
Statement:
highlights
importance
underscores
need
intervention
ensure
informed
choices
support
sustainable
agricultural
practices.
Язык: Английский