Academic Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 5, 2024
Язык: Английский
Academic Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 5, 2024
Язык: Английский
Healthcare, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 12(18), С. 1812 - 1812
Опубликована: Сен. 10, 2024
Natural disasters are large-scale catastrophic events, and they increasing in frequency severity. Converging evidence indicates that the mental health consequences of extensive often associated with trauma disruption personal socioeconomic factors people’s lives. Although most individuals experiencing disaster-related traumatic events do not develop illnesses, some experience adverse psychological effects disasters. These begin immediately following a disaster may persist for extended periods. In this article, we summarize literature findings to provide narrative review focuses on natural An overview research field is provided, ordered into theoretical frameworks. Then, development course psychopathology regarding aftermath described methodological context. Next, understanding as an event transition highlighted, impact disaster-specific discussed. Lastly, potential relationship between transitional speculated on, implications The can be direct or indirect, short-term long-term, extent depends recovery process affected community. Also, propose possible merits using Transitional Impact Scale context by assessing features its health. We conclude suggesting direction future terms measuring community settings (affected vs. non-affected) also considering cross-cultural cross-regional differences. recent decades, large amount knowledge has been gathered from research, but, still, more needed resolve irregular through refining variations.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
6BMJ Mental Health, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 28(1), С. e301357 - e301357
Опубликована: Март 1, 2025
Mental health complaints are increased in survivors of natural hazards and disaster responders. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy psychological psychosocial interventions for prevention mental disorders after exposure to hazards. We searched Web Science, PsycINFO MEDLINE peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials evaluating preventive targeting symptoms post-traumatic stress disorder, depression anxiety. Trials conducted both, civilians responders, were included. Random-effect meta-analyses assess relative active passive control conditions. The results from 10 included studies (5068 participants) did not find be superior compared with or conditions regarding disorder (g=0.08 g=0.05) (g=0.13 g=0.32, respectively). Effects on anxiety remain unclear. Aggregated effects all outcomes significant at follow-up controls, but interpretability is limited by low number studies. Intervention significantly associated intervention type (psychotherapy vs psychosocial), age delivery mode (online face-to-face). risk bias across was high. current evidence does allow any recommendations programmes aftermath A larger body high-quality research needed develop effective evidence-based https://osf.io/4es65.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 17, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Academic Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 5, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0