Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements DOI Creative Commons
Jan Pfänder, Sacha Altay

Nature Human Behaviour, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 21, 2025

Язык: Английский

Fighting misinformation among the most vulnerable users DOI Creative Commons
Nadia M. Brashier

Current Opinion in Psychology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 57, С. 101813 - 101813

Опубликована: Март 18, 2024

Misinformation undermines trust in the integrity of democratic elections, safety vaccines, and authenticity footage from war zones. Social scientists have proposed many solutions to reduce individuals' demand for fake news, but it is unclear how evaluate them. Efficacy can mean that an intervention increases discernment (the ability distinguish true false content), works over a delay, scales up, engages users. I argue experts should also consider differences exposure prevalence before declaring success. Misleading content makes up small fraction average person's news diet, some groups are at increased risk – conservatives older adults see share most news. Targeting whole population (universal prevention) could concentrate benefits among users who already least misinformation begin with. In complement these approaches, we design interventions people need them (selective prevention), as well shared low-quality (indicated prevention).

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements DOI Creative Commons
Jan Pfänder, Sacha Altay

Nature Human Behaviour, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 21, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0