Knowledge and Awareness of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Medicine Among International Stakeholders: A Cross‐Sectional Study DOI
Xufei Luo, Bingyi Wang, Yule Li

и другие.

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 18(2)

Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2025

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of medical stakeholders regarding use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among in medicine. Participants included researchers, clinicians, journal editors with varying degrees familiarity GAI The questionnaire comprised 40 questions covering four main dimensions: basic information, related to Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlation, multivariable regression were used analyze data. Results overall awareness rate tools 93.3%. demonstrated moderate knowledge (mean score 17.71 ± 5.56), positive attitudes 73.32 15.83), reasonable 40.70 12.86). Factors influencing education level, geographic region, ( p < 0.05). Attitudes influenced by work experience 0.05), while driven both 0.001). from outside China scored higher all dimensions compared those Additionally, 74.0% participants emphasized importance reporting usage research, 73.9% advocated for naming specific tool used. Conclusion findings highlight a growing generally attitude toward stakeholders, alongside recognition their ethical implications necessity standardized practices. Targeted training development clear guidelines are recommended enhance effective research practice.

Язык: Английский

Smooth Talking: Generative Versus Scripted Coaching Chatbot Adoption and Efficacy Comparison DOI Creative Commons
Nicky Terblanche

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 14

Опубликована: Ноя. 11, 2024

Workplace coaching is an essential individual and organizational development intervention, but high costs limit its application. AI chatbots could scale coaching, however, traditional scripted lacks mainstream adoption due to limited context awareness robotic responses. Recent advances in large language models generative offer alternative, linked risks controversies. Should use AI? We compared a scripted, rules-based chatbot (ScriptBot, n = 126) with (GenBot, 116) randomized controlled trail experiment. measured technology (UTAUT2), self-determination (autonomy, competence, relatedness) goal attainment. For all variables, GenBot outperformed ScriptBot. However, for attainment there was no significant difference. Using improves outcomes, highly structured interactions such as attainment, conversations (with lower risk) seem work just well.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3
Gen-AI for Transportation Planning DOI
Shriyank Somvanshi, Swastika Barua, Jinli Liu

и другие.

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Recalibrating Academic Expertise in the Age of Generative AI DOI

Aamir Sohail,

Zhicheng Lin

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Knowledge and Awareness of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Medicine Among International Stakeholders: A Cross‐Sectional Study DOI
Xufei Luo, Bingyi Wang, Yule Li

и другие.

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 18(2)

Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2025

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of medical stakeholders regarding use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among in medicine. Participants included researchers, clinicians, journal editors with varying degrees familiarity GAI The questionnaire comprised 40 questions covering four main dimensions: basic information, related to Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlation, multivariable regression were used analyze data. Results overall awareness rate tools 93.3%. demonstrated moderate knowledge (mean score 17.71 ± 5.56), positive attitudes 73.32 15.83), reasonable 40.70 12.86). Factors influencing education level, geographic region, ( p < 0.05). Attitudes influenced by work experience 0.05), while driven both 0.001). from outside China scored higher all dimensions compared those Additionally, 74.0% participants emphasized importance reporting usage research, 73.9% advocated for naming specific tool used. Conclusion findings highlight a growing generally attitude toward stakeholders, alongside recognition their ethical implications necessity standardized practices. Targeted training development clear guidelines are recommended enhance effective research practice.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0