Journal of Critical Realism,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
23(3), С. 274 - 291
Опубликована: Май 21, 2024
Critical
realism
provides
an
alternative
to
positivism
and
interpretivism.
It
foregrounds
ontology
evaluative
approach
knowledge,
while
promoting
eclectic
reasoning,
transdisciplinarity,
ethical
research
across
the
quantitative/qualitative,
macro/micro
other
divides.
Health
researchers
have
usefully
employed
critical
realism,
though
it
has
also
been
dismissed
as
strange,
a
source
of
self-deception
hubris.
Furthermore,
accused
dehumanizing
many
people.
Responding
these
charges,
this
article
makes
case
for
carefully
employing
within
beyond
social
studies
health.
first
outlines
some
basic
realist
tenets
before
summarizing
two
exemplars
sociology
health,
illness
medical
work.
The
discussion
section,
observing
principle
hermeticism,
engages
with
criticisms
offering
prolegomenon
on
COVID-19
pandemic
response.
In
conclusion,
'radical'
proposal
is
ventured
possible
transformative
action
so
that
society
less
hierarchical,
more
equal
salutogenic.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
17(15), С. 5514 - 5514
Опубликована: Июль 30, 2020
The
number
of
health
workers
infected
with
COVID-19
in
Spain
is
one
the
highest
world.
aim
this
study
to
analyse
posttraumatic
stress,
anxiety
and
depression
during
pandemic.
Associations
between
burnout,
resilience,
demographic,
work
variables
are
analysed.
Cross-sectional
data
on
1422
were
A
total
56.6%
present
symptoms
stress
disorder,
58.6%
46%
depressive
disorder
41.1%
feel
emotionally
drained.
profile
a
worker
greater
would
be
person
who
works
Autonomous
Community
Madrid,
hospital,
woman,
concerned
that
he/she
lives
may
infected,
thinks
very
likely
infected.
risk
for
working
12-
or
24-h
shifts,
being
worried
family
member
could
High
scores
emotional
exhaustion
depersonalization
factors
mental
health,
resilience
personal
fulfilment
protective
variables.
Data
provided
improve
preventive
measures
occupational
workers.
One Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
12, С. 100228 - 100228
Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2021
The
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic
has
affected
communities,
populations,
and
countries
throughout
the
world.
As
developed,
extent
to
which
disease
interacted
with
already
existing
endemic,
non-communicable
infectious
diseases
became
evident,
hence
deeply
influencing
health
outcomes.
Additionally,
a
synergistic
effect
been
demonstrated
also
socio-economic,
cultural,
contextual
determinants
of
seem
contribute
poorer
accumulating
social
disadvantages.
In
this
essay,
using
as
starting
point
syndemic
theory
that
translates
cumulative
intertwined
factors
between
different
epidemics,
we
argue
is
one
issue
nature
failure
acknowledge
contributes
weakened
policy-making
processes
public
responses
ineffective
policies
programs.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
9
Опубликована: Фев. 26, 2021
The
Severe
Acute
Respiratory
Syndrome
Coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
has
caused
the
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
worldwide
pandemic
in
2020.
In
response,
most
countries
world
implemented
lockdowns,
restricting
their
population's
movements,
work,
education,
gatherings,
and
general
activities
attempt
to
“flatten
curve”
of
COVID-19
cases.
public
health
goal
lockdowns
was
save
population
from
cases
deaths,
prevent
overwhelming
care
systems
with
patients.
this
narrative
review
I
explain
why
changed
my
mind
about
supporting
lockdowns.
initial
modeling
predictions
induced
fear
crowd-effects
(i.e.,
groupthink).
Over
time,
important
information
emerged
relevant
modeling,
including
lower
infection
fatality
rate
(median
0.23%),
clarification
high-risk
groups
(specifically,
those
70
years
age
older),
herd
immunity
thresholds
(likely
20–40%
immunity),
difficult
exit
strategies.
addition,
on
significant
collateral
damage
due
response
pandemic,
adversely
affecting
many
millions
people
poverty,
food
insecurity,
loneliness,
unemployment,
school
closures,
interrupted
healthcare.
Raw
numbers
deaths
were
interpret,
may
be
tempered
by
placing
number
proper
context
perspective
relative
background
rates.
Considering
information,
a
cost-benefit
analysis
finds
that
are
far
more
harmful
(at
least
5–10
times
so
terms
wellbeing
years)
than
can
be.
Controversies
objections
main
points
made
considered
addressed.
Progress
depends
considering
trade-offs
discussed
here
determine
populations.
close
some
suggestions
for
moving
forward,
focused
protection
truly
at
high
risk,
opening
schools,
building
back
better
economy.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
11
Опубликована: Окт. 15, 2020
The
novel
COVID-19
pandemic
has
created
an
extraordinary
situation
for
our
generation,
with
many
countries
being
on
lockdown.
With
this
new
comes
psychological
challenges,
not
only
health
care
workers
and
people
suffering
from
COVID-19,
but
also
the
general
population.
Adapting
to
can
be
demanding.
Experts
have
suggested
that
emotions
during
are
very
similar
grief,
experience
emptiness
sadness
about
loss
of
their
normal
lives,
which
even
lead
a
meaning
in
life.
In
paper,
we
argue
life
crafting
could
offer
way
help
cope
renew
sense
meaning.
A
intervention
is
based
theoretical
insights
multiple
areas
research,
like
positive
psychology,
expressive
writing,
salutogenesis
framework.
Life-crafting
interventions
find
by
focusing
ideal
future,
helping
them
set
goals,
make
concrete
plans
achieve
those
goals
overcome
obstacles.
Since
having
clear
purpose
or
been
shown
benefits,
propose
it
effects
pandemic.
life-crafting
chance
evaluate
time
uncertainty
rediscover
guide
through
these
difficult
times.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
12
Опубликована: Июнь 22, 2021
The
effectiveness
of
policymakers’
decision-making
in
times
crisis
depends
largely
on
their
ability
to
integrate
and
make
sense
information.
COVID-19
confronts
governments
with
the
difficult
task
making
decisions
interest
public
health
safety.
Essentially,
policymakers
have
react
a
threat,
which
extent
is
unknown,
they
are
under
time
constraints
midst
immense
uncertainty.
stakes
high,
issues
involved
complex
require
careful
balancing
several
interests,
including
(mental)
health,
economy,
human
rights.
These
circumstances
render
processes
vulnerable
errors
biases
processing
information,
thereby
increasing
chances
faulty
poor
outcomes.
Prior
research
has
identified
three
main
information-processing
failures
that
can
distort
group
lead
negative
outcomes:
(1)
failure
search
for
share
(2)
elaborate
analyze
information
not
line
earlier
(3)
revise
update
conclusions
policies
light
new
To
date,
it
yet
been
explored
how
underlying
these
impact
crisis.
In
this
narrative
review,
we
outline
groupthink,
narrow
focus
problem
containing
virus,
escalation
commitment
may
pose
real
risks
handling
result
widespread
societal
damages.
Hence,
vital
take
steps
maximize
quality
process
increase
positive
outcomes
as
goes
forward.
We
propose
reflexivity—a
deliberate
discussing
team
goals,
processes,
or
outcomes—as
an
antidote
decision-making.
Specifically,
recommend
evidence-based
reflexivity
tools
could
easily
be
implemented
counter
improve
uncertain
times.
New Journal of Physics,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
23(4), С. 043039 - 043039
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2021
Abstract
Community
lockdowns
and
travel
restrictions
are
commonly
employed
to
decelerate
epidemic
spreading.
We
here
use
a
stochastic
susceptible-infectious-recovered
model
on
different
social
networks
determine
when
what
degree
such
likely
be
effective.
Our
research
shows
that
community
effective
only
if
the
links
outside
of
communities
virtually
completely
sealed
off.
The
benefits
targeting
specifically
these
links,
as
opposed
uniformly
at
random
across
whole
network,
inferable
beyond
90%
lockdown
effectiveness.
And
even
then
peak
infected
curve
decreases
by
20%
its
onset
is
delayed
factor
1.5.
This
holds
for
static
temporal
networks,
regardless
their
size
structural
particularities.
Networks
derived
from
cell
phone
location
data
online
location-based
platforms
yield
same
results
large
family
hyperbolic
geometric
network
models
where
characteristic
path
lengths,
clustering,
structure
can
arbitrarily
adjusted.
complex
connectedness
modern
human
societies,
which
enables
ease
global
communication
lightning
speeds
news
information
spread,
thus
makes
it
very
difficult
halt
spreading
with
top-down
measures.
therefore
emphasize
outstanding
importance
endogenous
self-isolation
distancing
successfully
arresting
Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
12
Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2021
This
article
describes
patterns
of
compliance
with
social
distancing
measures
among
the
Spanish
population
during
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
It
identifies
several
factors
associated
higher
or
lower
recommended
distancing.
research
is
part
a
67-country
study,
titled
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
10
Опубликована: Авг. 25, 2022
A
series
of
aggressive
restrictive
measures
were
adopted
around
the
world
in
2020–2022
to
attempt
prevent
SARS-CoV-2
from
spreading.
However,
it
has
become
increasingly
clear
most
(lockdown)
response
strategies
may
involve
negative
side-effects
such
as
a
steep
increase
poverty,
hunger,
and
inequalities.
Several
economic,
educational,
health
repercussions
have
fallen
disproportionately
on
children,
students,
young
workers,
especially
groups
with
pre-existing
inequalities
low-income
families,
ethnic
minorities,
women.
This
led
vicious
cycle
rising
issues.
For
example,
educational
financial
security
decreased
along
unemployment
loss
life
purpose.
Domestic
violence
surged
due
dysfunctional
families
being
forced
spend
more
time
each
other.
In
current
narrative
scoping
review,
we
describe
macro-dynamics
that
are
taking
place
because
public
policies
psychological
tactics
influence
behavior,
mass
formation
crowd
behavior.
Coupled
effect
inequalities,
how
these
factors
can
interact
toward
aggravating
ripple
effects.
light
evidence
regarding
health,
economic
social
costs,
likely
far
outweigh
potential
benefits,
authors
suggest
that,
first,
where
applicable,
lockdown
should
be
reversed
their
re-adoption
future
avoided.
If
needed,
non-disruptive.
Second,
is
important
assess
dispassionately
damage
done
by
offer
ways
alleviate
burden
long-term
Third,
structures
counterproductive
assessed
sought
optimize
decision-making,
counteracting
groupthink
increasing
level
reflexivity.
Finally,
package
scalable
positive
psychology
interventions
suggested
counteract
improve
humanity's
prospects.