Abstract
Background
The
spread
of
the
coronavirus
has
led
to
significant
anxiety
among
university
students,
resulting
in
various
mental
health
problems
that
could
potentially
impact
their
academic
performance.
Method
To
examine
mediating
role
emotional
regulation
and
online
social
support
relationships
between
COVID-19
psychological
pressures,
depression,
fear
missing
out
(FoMO)
young
adult
a
cross-sectional
research
design
was
employed
using
an
survey.
sample
consisted
521
full-time
students
from
China,
currently
enrolled
undergraduate
postgraduate
programs.
Results
Findings
revealed
more
than
half
(55.09%,
n
=287)
experienced
pressures.
These
pressures
directly
contributed
increased
levels
depression
(
β
=
0.339,
p
<
.001)
0.236,
.001).
Moreover,
exhibited
partial
effects
on
association
out.
results
indicated
were
linked
higher
depressive
symptoms
greater
students.
Conclusions
However,
provision
timely
adequate
support,
as
well
implementation
strategies,
mitigated
negative
pandemic
students'
well-being.
Consequently,
this
reduced
Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(13), С. 4425 - 4425
Опубликована: Июнь 30, 2023
In
recent
years,
there
has
been
increasing
recognition
of
mental
health
concerns
in
academia,
with
stress,
burnout,
anxiety,
and
depression
being
reported
among
faculty
members.
The
demanding
work
environment,
the
need
to
balance
personal
professional
duties,
constant
pressure
productivity
while
navigating
multiple
tasks
teaching,
research,
mentorship,
development,
service
all
impact
overall
well-being
faculty.
Higher
education
institutions
have
structurally
changed
as
research
landscape.
These
changes
well
faculty-specific
student-specific
factors
coupled
effect
COVID-19
pandemic
led
profound
effects
on
academics.
This
paper
is
a
narrative
review
pertinent
literature
describing
well-being.
It
summarizes
available
evidence
influencing
shows
prevalence
depression,
burnout
from
various
academic
fields
along
whole
ladder.
Using
suggested
framework
that
collates
efforts
leaders
faculty,
concludes
by
exploring
strategies
promote
work–life
academics
suggesting
effective
interventions
improve
their
outcomes.
PLoS Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
20(4), С. e1004206 - e1004206
Опубликована: Апрель 25, 2023
Background
There
remains
uncertainty
about
the
impact
of
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
on
mental
health.
This
umbrella
review
provides
a
comprehensive
overview
association
between
and
common
disorders.
We
qualitatively
summarized
evidence
from
reviews
with
meta-analyses
individual
study-data
in
general
population,
healthcare
workers,
specific
at-risk
populations.
Methods
findings
A
systematic
search
was
carried
out
5
databases
for
peer-reviewed
prevalence
depression,
anxiety,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
symptoms
during
published
December
31,
until
August
12,
2022.
identified
123
which
7
provided
standardized
mean
differences
(SMDs)
either
longitudinal
pre-
to
or
cross-sectional
compared
matched
pre-pandemic
data.
Methodological
quality
rated
Assessment
Multiple
Systematic
Reviews
checklist
scores
(AMSTAR
2)
instrument
generally
low
moderate.
Small
but
significant
increases
and/or
health
were
reported
people
preexisting
physical
conditions,
children
(3
reviews;
SMDs
ranged
0.11
0.28).
Mental
depression
significantly
increased
periods
social
restrictions
(1
review;
0.41
0.83,
respectively)
anxiety
did
not
(SMD:
0.26).
Increases
larger
longer-lasting
0.16
0.23)
than
those
(2
reviews:
0.12
0.18).
Females
showed
increase
males
review:
SMD
0.15).
In
disorders,
any
patient
group,
adolescents,
students,
no
found
SMD’s
ranging
−0.16
0.48).
116
pooled
rates
PTSD
9%
48%
across
Although
heterogeneity
studies
high
largely
unexplained,
assessment
tools
cut-offs
used,
age,
sex
gender,
COVID-19
exposure
factors
be
moderators
some
reviews.
The
major
limitations
are
inability
quantify
explain
included
shortage
within-person
data
multiple
studies.
Conclusions
small
consistent
deterioration
particularly
early
has
been
population
chronic
somatic
Also,
associations
stronger
females
younger
age
groups
others.
Explanatory
individual-level,
exposure,
time-course
scarce
inconsistencies
For
policy
research,
repeated
assessments
panels
including
vulnerable
individuals
recommended
respond
current
future
crises.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
14
Опубликована: Март 8, 2023
Background
The
mental
health
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
remain
a
public
concern.
High
quality
synthesis
extensive
global
literature
is
needed
to
quantify
this
impact
and
identify
factors
associated
with
adverse
outcomes.
Methods
We
conducted
rigorous
umbrella
review
meta-review
present
(a)
pooled
prevalence
probable
depression,
anxiety,
stress,
psychological
distress,
post-traumatic
(b)
standardised
mean
difference
in
depression
anxiety
pre-versus-during
period,
(c)
comprehensive
narrative
poorer
Databases
searched
included
Scopus,
Embase,
PsycINFO,
MEDLINE
dated
March
2022.
Eligibility
criteria
systematic
reviews
and/or
meta-analyses,
published
post-November
2019,
reporting
data
English
on
outcomes
during
pandemic.
Findings
Three
hundred
thirty-eight
were
included,
158
which
incorporated
meta-analyses.
Meta-review
symptoms
ranged
from
24.4%
(95%CI:
18–31%,
I
2
:
99.98%)
for
general
populations
41.1%
23–61%,
99.65%)
vulnerable
populations.
Prevalence
depressive
22.9%
17–30%,
99.99%)
32.5%
17–52%,
99.35)
distress
PTSD/PTSS
39.1%
34–44%;
99.91%),
44.2%
32–58%;
99.95%),
18.8%
15–23%;
99.87%),
respectively.
comparing
pre-COVID-19
revealed
standard
differences
0.20
(95%CI
=
0.07–0.33)
0.29
0.12–0.45),
Conclusion
This
first
synthesise
longitudinal
show
that
significantly
higher
than
pre-COVID-19,
provide
some
evidence
adolescents,
pregnant
postpartum
people,
those
hospitalised
experienced
heightened
health.
Policymakers
can
modify
future
responses
accordingly
mitigate
such
measures
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
17(4), С. e0267081 - e0267081
Опубликована: Апрель 14, 2022
Previous
studies
showed
that
the
COVID-19
outbreak
increased
levels
of
depression
and
anxiety
in
heterogeneous
populations.
However,
none
has
explored
prevalence
correlates
among
Chinese
international
students
studying
US
colleges
during
pandemic.This
study
examines
enrolled
universities
pandemic
identifies
associated
factors,
including
habits,
social
psychological
support,
sleep
quality,
remote
learning.Between
June
July
2020,
we
conducted
a
cross-sectional
through
Wenjuanxing,
web-based
survey
platform.
Participants
were
recruited
with
snowball
sampling
21
student
associations
universities.
The
consisted
demographic
questions,
Social
Support
Rating
Scale
(SSRS),
Insomnia
Severity
Index
(ISI),
Patient
Health
Questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9),
General
Anxiety
Disorder-7
(GAD-7),
self-constructed
questions
on
academic
performance,
financial
concerns,
use
media,
physical
exercise,
support.
Cut-off
scores
10
used
for
both
PHQ-9
GAD-7
to
determine
binary
outcomes
anxiety,
respectively.
Bivariant
analyses
multivariable
logistic
regression
performed
identify
factors.Among
1881
participants,
found
(PHQ-9
score⩾
10)
at
24.5%
(GAD-7
20.7%.
A
higher
risk
was
recent
exposure
traumatic
events,
agreement
pandemic's
negative
impacts
status,
strong
learning
personal
relationships,
ISI
score.
lower
disagreement
performance
future
careers,
willingness
seek
professional
help
emotional
issues,
SSRS
In
addition,
lot
workloads,
often
staying
up
online
classes,
score.This
high
pandemic.
Multiple
correlates-including
pandemic-related
workload,
learning,
help,
quality-were
identified.
It
is
critical
further
investigate
this
population
provide
more
flexible
options
access
services.
Education Sciences,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
11(9), С. 473 - 473
Опубликована: Авг. 27, 2021
Stressful
events
can
cause
a
significant
impact
on
education;
however,
it
is
not
yet
clear
how
the
interplay
between
anxiety,
work,
and
social
dysfunction
relates
to
learning
impairments.
In
this
study,
we
investigated
of
COVID-19
pandemic
students’
mental
health.
This
study
was
conducted
during
four
modules
remote
Psychopharmacology
course
5
October
20
December
2020.
We
collected
data
from
28
Psychology
undergraduate
students
at
University
São
Paulo,
Brazil.
used
pre-
post-test
multiple-choice
questions
obtain
quantitative
measure
learning.
Students
completed
an
online
survey
report
demographic
information,
functional
impairment
(Work
Social
Adjustment
scale;
WSAS),
generalized
anxiety
(Generalized
Anxiety
Disorder
GAD-7),
coronavirus
(Brazilian
adapted
version
Coronavirus
Scale;
CAS-BR),
self-perception
with
lectures’
methodology.
our
sample,
42.9%
respondents
experienced
symptoms
disorders
(GAD-7
≥
15),
53.6%
had
moderate
severe
(WSAS
>
20).
also
observed
overlapping
profile
highly
anxious
dysfunctional
students.
A
chi-square
test
independence
revealed
relation
pairs
answers
GAD-7
scores,
indicating
that
less
were
more
likely
perform
better
in
post-tests.
Intriguingly,
correlational
analysis
suggested
scores
20)
change
incorrect
correct
answer
suggests
psychological
distress
states
might
influence
ability
coordinate
work
activities
performance
Although
evaluated
small
sample
students,
highlights
importance
investigating
measures
as
part
remote-learning
curriculum.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
18(16), С. 8755 - 8755
Опубликована: Авг. 19, 2021
This
work
studied
self-reports
from
adolescents
on
how
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
changed
their
behaviors,
relationships,
mood,
and
victimization.
Data
collection
was
conducted
between
September
2020
February
2021
in
five
countries
(Sweden,
USA,
Serbia,
Morocco,
Vietnam).
In
total,
5114
high
school
students
(aged
15
to
19
years,
61.8%
females)
responded
our
electronic
survey.
A
substantial
proportion
of
reported
decreased
time
being
outside
(41.7%),
meeting
friends
real
life
(59.4%),
performance
(30.7%),
while
reporting
increased
do
things
they
did
not
have
for
before
(49.3%)
using
social
media
stay
connected
(44.9%).
One
third
exercise
felt
that
more
control
over
life.
Only
a
small
substance
use,
norm-breaking
or
The
overall
impact
adolescent
gender-specific:
we
found
stronger
negative
female
students.
results
indicated
majority
could
adapt
dramatic
changes
environment.
However,
healthcare
institutions,
municipalities,
schools,
services
benefit
findings
this
study
meet
needs
those
young
people
who
signaled
worsened
psychosocial
functioning,
stress,
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
19(5), С. 2966 - 2966
Опубликована: Март 3, 2022
Higher
education
organizations
have
been
influenced
by
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
During
school
closures,
online
teaching
and
learning
has
become
a
new
routine
that
may
lead
to
changes
in
lifestyles
adversely
affect
university
students’
health.
Therefore,
this
study
was
understand
potential
impact
of
on
physical
mental
health
investigating
differences
activity,
psychological
distress,
student
life
stress
Taiwanese
students
between
in-class
periods.
A
total
181
were
recruited
from
local
university.
All
participants
requested
complete
an
survey
self-report
periods,
respectively.
The
results
indicated
significant
reduction
activity
various
intensities
(p
<
0.05).
Specifically,
male
showed
greater
decrease
vigorous
compared
their
female
peers.
Yet,
there
no
increase
distress
period
period.
In
summary,
drastically
reduces
during
students.
Notably,
be
at
risk
insufficient
participation
activity.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
19(15), С. 9347 - 9347
Опубликована: Июль 30, 2022
The
worldwide
spread
of
SARS-CoV-2
has
been
responsible
for
an
infectious
pandemic,
with
repercussions
on
socio-economic
aspects
and
the
physical
mental
health
general
population.
present
systematic
review
aimed
to
evaluate
data
belonging
European
framework,
analyzing
population
by
age
group.
Original
articles
reviews
state
have
researched
starting
from
2021.
Initially,
a
total
1764
studies
were
found,
among
which
75
selected.
Youth
group
most
affected
pandemic
consequences
health,
emotional
behavioral
alterations
observed
third
more
than
half
children
adolescents
examined.
Among
both
adults,
female
gender
had
higher
prevalence
psychopathological
symptoms.
main
risk
factors
poor
social
support,
economic
difficulties,
and,
in
particular,
unemployment
or
job
changes.
Additional
individual
perception
loneliness,
presence
pre-pandemic
illness/distress,
some
personality
traits,
such
as
neuroticism,
impulsiveness,
use
maladaptive
coping
strategies.
Unexpectedly,
elderly
maintained
good
resilience
towards
change,
even
if
stress
factor
was
represented
feeling
loneliness
contact.
As
regards
suicidal
behaviors,
adolescents,
there
increase
attempts
25%,
greater
gender.
This
increased
also
association
symptoms
anxiety
depression,
socio-environmental
conditions.
In
conclusion,
groups
found
be
at
psychological
burden
during
waves,
thus
representing
priority
targets
socio-health
interventions.