Women & Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 15
Опубликована: Янв. 17, 2025
A
growing
body
of
evidence
suggests
a
potential
link
between
the
SARS-CoV-2
vaccine
and
menstrual
changes
in
women
who
were
menstruating
at
time
vaccination.
Nevertheless,
prevalence
this
event
those
with
secondary
amenorrhea
for
different
causes,
i.e.
formerly
women,
remains
unclear.
It
is
plausible
that,
analogous
to
observed
currently
they
experienced
some
degree
alteration
their
reproductive
health,
defined
here
as
menstrual-related
disturbances.
The
aim
was
analyze
phenomenon
identify
factors
associated
occurrence
disturbances
subpopulation.
Study
design:
retrospective
observational
cross-sectional
study
conducted
among
adult
Spanish
December
2021
using
an
online
survey
(N
=
17,512).
present
analysis
includes
subpopulation
vaccinated
548).
General
characteristics,
medical
history,
adverse
events
following
COVID-19
vaccination
recorded.
Chi-square,
Mann-Whitney
U
McNemar
mid-P
tests
performed.
Bivariate
logistic
regression
then
used
key
influencing
unexpected
event.
In
comparison
first
dose,
significantly
higher
percentages
respondents
(dose
1:
38.5
percent
vs.
dose
2:
44.8
percent)
after
receiving
second
one.
Among
them,
related
length
flow
stand
out,
being
long-term
nature
about
17-20
cases.
Interindividual
1
may
include
weight,
perimenopause,
preexisting
diagnoses
non-autoimmune
rheumatic/articular
conditions,
use
hormonal
contraceptives,
suffering
from
other
side
effects
-
such
arm
pain
number
previous
pregnancies;
2,
these
alterations
1,
well
contraceptives
perimenopause.
Formerly
might
experience
Potential
pregnancies.
iScience,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
26(4), С. 106401 - 106401
Опубликована: Март 15, 2023
There
has
been
increasing
public
concern
that
COVID-19
vaccination
causes
menstrual
disturbance
regarding
the
relative
effect
of
compared
to
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Our
objectives
were
test
potential
risk
factors
for
reporting
cycle
changes
following
and
compare
parameters
disease.
We
performed
a
secondary
analysis
retrospective
online
survey
conducted
in
UK
March
2021.
In
pre-menopausal
vaccinated
participants
(n
=
4,989),
18%
reported
after
their
first
vaccine
injection.
The
prevalence
any
was
higher
women
who
smoke,
have
history
disease,
or
are
not
using
estradiol-containing
contraceptives.
second
sample
including
both
unvaccinated
12,579),
alone
associated
with
abnormal
parameters,
while
disease
an
increased
heavier
bleeding,
"missed"
periods,
inter-menstrual
bleeding.
npj Digital Medicine,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
5(1)
Опубликована: Ноя. 2, 2022
COVID-19
vaccination
may
be
associated
with
change
in
menstrual
cycle
length
following
vaccination.
We
estimated
covariate-adjusted
differences
mean
(MCL),
measured
days,
between
pre-vaccination
cycles,
and
post-vaccination
cycles
within
vaccinated
participants
who
met
eligibility
criteria
the
Apple
Women's
Health
Study,
a
longitudinal
mobile-application-based
cohort
of
people
U.S.
manually
logged
cycles.
A
total
9652
(8486
vaccinated;
1166
unvaccinated)
contributed
128,094
(median
=
10
per
participant;
inter-quartile
range:
4-22).
Fifty-five
percent
received
Pfizer-BioNTech's
mRNA
vaccine,
37%
Moderna's
8%
Johnson
&
Johnson/Janssen
(J&J)
vaccine.
was
small
increase
MCL
for
which
first
dose
(0.50
95%
CI:
0.22,
0.78)
second
(0.39
0.11,
0.67)
vaccines
compared
Cycles
single
J&J
administered
were,
on
average,
1.26
days
longer
(95%
0.45,
2.07)
than
Post-vaccination
returned
to
average
length.
Estimated
follicular
phase
increased
(0.97
0.53,
1.42)
or
(1.43
1.06,
1.80)
(2.27
1.04,
3.50),
Menstrual
appears
temporary
should
not
discourage
individuals
from
becoming
vaccinated.
The Lancet Digital Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
4(9), С. e667 - e675
Опубликована: Авг. 9, 2022
BackgroundAnecdotal
reports
of
menstrual
irregularities
after
receiving
COVID-19
vaccines
have
been
observed
in
post-authorisation
and
post-licensure
monitoring.
We
aimed
to
identify
classify
vaginal
bleeding
vaccination
submitted
a
voluntary
active
surveillance
system.MethodsThis
observational
cohort
study
included
recipients
vaccine
who
were
aged
18
years
older
reported
their
health
experiences
v-safe,
smartphone-based
system
for
monitoring
safety
the
USA,
from
Dec
14,
2020,
Jan
9,
2022.
Responses
survey
questions
on
reactions
extracted,
pre-trained
natural
language
inference
model
was
used
free-text
comments
related
menstruation
response
an
open-ended
prompt
about
any
symptoms
at
intervals
vaccination.
Related
responses
further
categorised
into
themes
timing,
severity,
perimenopausal
postmenopausal
bleeding,
resumption
menses,
other
responses.
examined
associations
between
symptom
theme
respondent
characteristics,
including
type
dose
number
received,
solicited
local
systemic
reported,
care
sought.Findings63
815
respondents
or
which
62
679
female
(1·0%
5
975
363
≥18
years).
Common
identified
timing
(70
981
[83·6%]
responses)
severity
(56
890
[67·0%]
responses).
Other
menopausal
(3439
[4·0%]
menses
(2378
[2·8%]
Respondents
submitting
more
likely
seek
than
those
themes.InterpretationReports
heterogeneous
are
being
although
this
is
unable
characterise
relationship
these
Methods
that
leverage
pretrained
models
interpret
unsolicited
signs
offer
promise
initial
evaluation
unexpected
adverse
events
potentially
associated
with
use
newly
authorised
licensed
vaccines.FundingCenters
Disease
Control
Prevention.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
130(7), С. 803 - 812
Опубликована: Апрель 10, 2023
Abstract
Objective
To
assess
whether
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
vaccination
impacts
menstrual
bleeding
quantity.
Design
Retrospective
cohort.
Setting
Five
global
regions.
Population
Vaccinated
and
unvaccinated
individuals
with
regular
cycles
using
the
digital
fertility‐awareness
application
Natural
Cycles°.
Methods
We
used
prospectively
collected
cycle
data,
multivariable
longitudinal
Poisson
generalised
estimating
equation
(GEE)
models
multinomial
logistic
regression
to
calculate
adjusted
difference
between
groups.
All
were
for
confounding
factors.
Main
outcome
measures
The
mean
number
of
heavy
days
(fewer,
no
change
or
more)
changes
in
quantity
(less,
at
three
time
points
(first
dose,
second
dose
post‐exposure
menses).
Results
included
9555
(7401
vaccinated
2154
unvaccinated).
About
two‐thirds
reported
days,
regardless
status.
After
adjusting
factors,
there
significant
differences
by
A
larger
proportion
experienced
an
increase
total
(34.5%
unvaccinated,
38.4%
vaccinated;
4.0%,
99.2%
CI
0.7%–7.2%).
This
translates
estimated
40
additional
people
per
1000
normal
who
experience
a
greater
following
first
vaccine
dose'
suffice.
Differences
resolved
post‐exposure.
Conclusions
small
probability
occurred
COVID‐19
which
after
post‐vaccination
cycle.
did
not
differ
Our
findings
can
reassure
public
that
any
are
transient.
BMJ,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown, С. e074778 - e074778
Опубликована: Май 3, 2023
To
evaluate
the
risks
of
any
menstrual
disturbance
and
bleeding
following
SARS-CoV-2
vaccination
in
women
who
are
premenopausal
or
postmenopausal.A
nationwide,
register
based
cohort
study.All
inpatient
specialised
outpatient
care
Sweden
from
27
December
2020
to
28
February
2022.
A
subset
covering
primary
for
40%
Swedish
female
population
was
also
included.2
946
448
aged
12-74
years
were
included.
Pregnant
women,
living
nursing
homes,
with
history
menstruation
disorders,
breast
cancer,
cancer
genital
organs,
underwent
a
hysterectomy
between
1
January
2015
26
excluded.SARS-CoV-2
vaccination,
by
vaccine
product
(BNT162b2,
mRNA-1273,
ChAdOx1
nCoV-19
(AZD1222))
dose
(unvaccinated
first,
second,
third
dose)
over
two
time
windows
(one
seven
days,
considered
control
period,
8-90
days).Healthcare
contact
(admission
hospital
visit)
before
after
menopause
(diagnosed
International
Statistical
Classification
Diseases
Related
Health
Problems,
Tenth
Revision
codes
N91,
N92,
N93,
N95).2
580
007
(87.6%)
2
received
at
least
one
652
472
(64.0%)
vaccinated
three
doses
end
follow-up.
The
highest
postmenopausal
observed
dose,
days
risk
window
(hazard
ratio
1.28
(95%
confidence
interval
1.01
1.62))
(1.25
(1.04
1.50)).
impact
adjustment
covariates
modest.
Risk
suggested
23-33%
increased
BNT162b2
mRNA-1273
but
association
less
clear.
For
premenopausal,
almost
completely
removed
weak
associations
noted
crude
analyses.Weak
inconsistent
healthcare
contacts
postmenopausal,
even
evidence
recorded
an
premenopausal.
These
findings
do
not
provide
substantial
support
causal
related
disorders.
Vaccine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
41(36), С. 5271 - 5282
Опубликована: Июль 3, 2023
Many
signals
of
menstrual
disturbances
as
possible
side
effects
vaccination
against
COVID-19
have
been
reported.
Our
objective
was
to
compare
the
risk
before
and
after
among
women
aged
18-30
years
in
Oslo,
Norway.
We
used
electronic
questionnaires
collect
reports
from
3972
years,
participating
population-based
Norwegian
Young
Adult
Cohort.
examined
occurrence
(heavier
bleeding
than
usual,
prolonged
bleeding,
shorter
interval
between
menstruations,
longer
spot
bleedings,
stronger
pain
during
menstruation,
period
without
bleeding)
first
second
dose
vaccine.
Relative
risks
(RR)
according
were
estimated
using
a
self-controlled
case-series
design.
performed
additional
analyses
stratified
by
vaccine
brand,
contraception/hormone
use,
presence
gynecological
condition(s).
The
prevalence
any
disturbance
36.7%
last
cycle
prior
dose.
RR
for
heavier
usual
1.90
(95%
CI:
1.69-2.13)
1.84
(1.66-2.03)
Increased
menstruation
also
observed
both
doses.
RRs
did
not
differ
with
or
condition(s)
disturbances.
Menstrual
common
regardless
vaccination.
found
increased
vaccination,
particularly
pain.
In
future,
characteristics
should
be
included
trials.
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
50(3), С. 212 - 225
Опубликована: Июнь 10, 2024
Menstrual
health
is
a
key
patient-reported
outcome
beyond
its
importance
as
general
indicator
of
and
fertility.
However,
menstrual
function
was
not
measured
in
the
clinical
trials
COVID-19
vaccines.
The
purpose
this
review
to
synthesise
existing
literature
on
relationship
between
vaccination
outcomes.
Molecular Pharmaceutics,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
21(2), С. 393 - 409
Опубликована: Янв. 8, 2024
Female
reproductive
health
has
traditionally
been
an
underrepresented
area
of
research
in
the
drug
delivery
sciences.
This
disparity
is
also
seen
emerging
field
mRNA
therapeutics,
a
class
medicines
that
promises
to
treat
and
prevent
disease
by
upregulating
protein
expression
body.
Here,
we
review
advances
therapies
through
lens
improving
female
health.
Specifically,
begin
our
discussing
fundamental
structure
biochemical
modifications
associated
with
mRNA-based
drugs.
Then,
discuss
various
packaging
technologies,
including
lipid
nanoparticles,
can
be
utilized
protect
transport
drugs
target
cells
Last,
conclude
usage
therapy
for
addressing
pregnancy-related
vaccination
against
sexually
transmitted
diseases
women.
Of
note,
highlight
relevant
clinical
trials
using
while
providing
their
corresponding
National
Clinical
Trial
identifiers.
In
undertaking
this
review,
aim
provide
background
understanding
its
specifically
address
issues
overarching
goal
information
toward
gender
certain
aspects
research.