Differential diagnosis of autism, attachment disorders, complex post‐traumatic stress disorder and emotionally unstable personality disorder: A Delphi study
British Journal of Psychology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Сен. 20, 2024
Abstract
Individuals
diagnosed
with
autism,
attachment
disorders,
emotionally
unstable
personality
disorder
(EUPD)
or
complex
post‐traumatic
stress
(CPTSD)
can
present
similar
features.
This
renders
differential
and
accurate
diagnosis
of
these
conditions
difficult,
leading
to
diagnostic
overshadowing
misdiagnosis.
The
purpose
this
study
was
explore
professionals'
perspectives
on
the
disorders
CPTSD
in
young
people;
EUPD
adults.
A
co‐produced
three‐round
Delphi
gathered
information
through
a
series
questionnaires
from
106
international
professionals
expertise
assessing
and/or
diagnosing
at
least
one
conditions.
To
provide
specialist
guidance
data
triangulation,
working
groups
experts
by
experience,
clinicians
researchers
were
consulted.
statements
considered
have
reached
consensus
if
80%
participants
agreement.
Two
hundred
seventy‐five
consensus.
Overlapping
differentiating
features,
methods
assessment,
difficulties
encountered
during
suggestions
for
improvements
identified.
findings
highlight
current
practices
people
Areas
future
research,
clinical
service
provision
implications,
also
Язык: Английский
A Systematic Review on Assessing Assessments: Unveiling Psychometric Properties of Instruments for Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder in Minors under Protective Measures
Children,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
11(2), С. 144 - 144
Опубликована: Янв. 24, 2024
Background:
Reactive
attachment
disorder
(RAD)
and
disinhibited
social
engagement
(DSED)
manifest
in
individuals
facing
system
challenges,
particularly
observed
minors
under
protective
measures.
The
lack
of
standardized
tools
for
assessing
these
difficulties
uncertainty
about
the
most
effective
instruments
from
a
psychometric
perspective
prompted
this
study.
Aim:
Using
COSMIN
checklist,
we
systematically
reviewed
RAD,
adhering
to
PRISMA.
Methodology:
Examined
included
Disturbance
Attachment
Interview,
Preschool
Age
Psychiatric
Assessment,
Relationship
Patterns
Questionnaire,
Assessment
RAD
DSED,
Development
Well-Being
Disorder
Questionnaire.
Results:
Of
10
articles
analyzed,
results
highlight
research
emphasis
on
internal
consistency
structural
construct
validity,
sidelining
other
properties.
Conclusion:
Most
review
validity
consistency.
These
measures
are
satisfactory
but
insufficiently
evaluated.
It
is
necessary
evaluate
using
indicators
such
as
cross-cultural
measurement
error,
or
responsiveness
adolescents
Язык: Английский