Training-related improvements in mental well-being through reduction in negative interpretation bias: A randomized trial of online socio-emotional dyadic and mindfulness interventions
Journal of Affective Disorders,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
354, С. 662 - 672
Опубликована: Март 12, 2024
Effects
of
online
contemplative
practices,
especially
partner-based
on
psychological
well-being
remain
mixed,
with
sparse
understanding
potential
affective-cognitive
mechanisms.
The
study
aimed
to
assess
the
efficacy
two
interventions
in
improving
depression,
anxiety,
emotion
regulation
(ER),
and
resilience,
evaluate
mechanistic
role
negative
attention
interpretation
biases.
Employing
a
randomized
controlled
design
(n
=
285),
we
compared
10-week
mindfulness-based
socio-emotional
dyadic
interventions,
both
supported
by
weekly
coaching
sessions.
Mental
health
aspects
were
assessed
using
validated
self-report
measures
biases
mouse-contingent
Scrambled
Sentences
Task.
Both
waitlist
control,
led
reductions
depression
ER
difficulties,
while
trait
anxiety
decreased
only
after
mindfulness
training.
Increases
multidimensional
resilience
observed
training
stress
recovery
training,
control.
Socio-emotional
significant
bias
this
mediated
anxiety.
Neither
state
or
bias.
subclinical
nature
overrepresentation
females
sample
limits
generalizability.
Findings
indicate
that
sessions,
can
reduce
difficulties.
Though
practice
reduced
enhanced
recovery,
increased
resilience.
bias,
which
emerged
as
an
intervention-specific
mechanism.
These
findings
highlight
benefits
intervention
approaches
for
well-being.
Язык: Английский
Large-scale digital phenotyping: Identifying depression and anxiety indicators in a general UK population with over 10,000 participants
Journal of Affective Disorders,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Impact of childhood maltreatment on adult mental health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic
Brain Behavior and Immunity,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
A neuroscience perspective on the plasticity of the social and relational brain
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 3, 2025
Over
the
past
two
decades,
fields
of
social
and
contemplative
neurosciences
have
made
significant
strides.
Initial
research
utilizing
fMRI
identified
neuronal
networks
involved
in
empathy,
mentalizing,
compassion,
as
well
complex
interactions
among
these
networks.
Subsequent
studies
shifted
to
testing
plasticity
skills
via
different
types
mindfulness-
or
compassion-based
mental
training
programs,
demonstrating
brain
plasticity,
enhanced
capacities
motivation,
improved
health
overall
well-being.
Next,
researchers
developed
scalable
evidence-based
online
programs
address
growing
levels
problems
loneliness,
both
exacerbated
by
COVID-19
pandemic.
Innovative
approaches,
such
novel
relational
partner-based
practices
app-based
dyadic
offer
solutions
counteract
ongoing
societal
deterioration.
Current
are
now
applying
above
findings
support
resilience
building
within
diverse
domains
society
professional
populations-such
healthcare
workers
teachers-at
high
risk
burn-out.
Future
should
explore
broader
impact
training-related
individual
changes
on
larger
systems,
potentially
leading
development
a
translational
neuroscience
approach
that
leverages
insights
from
needs,
thereby
enhancing
resilience,
health,
cohesion.
Язык: Английский
COVID-19-Pandemie und die psychische Gesundheit in Deutschland: Verlauf, resiliente und vulnerable Gruppen
Der Nervenarzt,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 3, 2025
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die
COVID-19(„coronavirus
disease
2019“)-Pandemie
stellte
die
bisher
wohl
größte
gesundheitliche
Krise
des
21.
Jahrhunderts
dar.
Sie
bedeutete
für
viele
Menschen
eine
andauernde
Exposition
gegenüber
psychisch
relevanten
Stressoren
bei
gleichzeitig
eingeschränkten
Bewältigungsmöglichkeiten.
Ziel
der
Arbeit
vorliegende
Übersicht
hat
zum
Ziel,
den
aktuellen
Kenntnisstand
Verlauf
psychischen
Gesundheit
in
Deutschland
während
COVID-19-Pandemie
zusammenfassend
darzustellen.
Material
und
Methoden
Anhand
longitudinaler
wiederholt-querschnittlicher
Erhebungen
werden
wesentliche
Erkenntnisse
zusammengefasst
Vulnerabilitäts-
Resilienzfaktoren
herausgearbeitet.
Ergebnisse
Berichtet
weite
Teile
Bevölkerung
zumindest
vorübergehende
Beeinträchtigungen
Wohlbefindens
im
Sinne
einer
erhöhten
Angstsymptomatik
Depressivität
sowie
verringerten
Lebenszufriedenheit,
insbesondere
Frauen
Kindern
bzw.
Jugendlichen.
Gleichzeitig
wurden
Mehrzahl
Fälle
resiliente
Verläufe
beobachtet,
d.
h.
meisten
Personen
gelang
es
Pandemie,
ihre
psychische
aufrechtzuerhalten.
Als
Vulnerabilitätsfaktoren
gelten
neben
weiblichen
Geschlechtszugehörigkeit
einem
jüngeren
Alter
auch
finanzielle
Schwierigkeiten.
wichtige
zeigen
sich
dagegen
ein
positiver
Bewertungsstil,
kognitive
Flexibilität,
soziale
Unterstützung,
Selbstwirksamkeitserleben
und,
auf
gesellschaftlicher
Ebene,
sozialer
Zusammenhang
Vertrauen
Institutionen.
Diskussion
identifizierten
bieten
konkrete
Ansatzpunkte
zur
Förderung
„pandemic
preparedness“.
Interplay between uncertainty intolerance, emotion regulation, cognitive flexibility, and psychopathology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-wave study
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
13(1)
Опубликована: Июнь 17, 2023
Abstract
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
created
a
significant
mental
health
burden
on
the
global
population.
Studies
during
have
shown
that
risk
factors
such
as
intolerance
of
uncertainty
and
maladaptive
emotion
regulation
are
associated
with
increased
psychopathology.
Meanwhile,
protective
cognitive
control
flexibility
been
to
protect
pandemic.
However,
potential
pathways
through
which
these
function
impact
remain
unclear.
In
present
multi-wave
study,
304
individuals
(18
years
or
older,
191
Males),
residing
in
USA
data
collection,
completed
weekly
online
assessments
validated
questionnaires
across
period
five
weeks
(27th
March
2020–1st
May
2020).
Mediation
analyses
revealed
longitudinal
changes
difficulties
mediated
effect
increases
stress,
depression,
anxiety
Further,
individual
differences
moderated
relationship
between
difficulties.
While
emerged
for
health,
seems
against
negative
effects
promote
stress
resilience.
Interventions
aimed
at
enhancing
might
protection
similar
crises
future.
Язык: Английский
Resilient Stress Reactivity Profiles Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Contemplative Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Personalized Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(5), С. 493 - 493
Опубликована: Май 4, 2024
Low-dose
app-based
contemplative
interventions
for
mental
health
are
increasingly
popular,
but
heterogeneity
in
intervention
responses
indicates
that
a
personalized
approach
is
needed.
We
examined
whether
different
longitudinal
resilience-vulnerability
trajectories,
derived
over
the
course
of
COVID-19
pandemic,
predicted
differences
diverse
outcomes
after
mindfulness
and
socio-emotional
dyadic
online
interventions.
The
CovSocial
project
comprised
assessment
(phase
1)
an
open-label
efficacy
trial
2).
A
community
sample
253
participants
received
12
min
daily
or
mindfulness-based
interventions,
with
weekly
coaching
10
weeks.
Before
intervention,
completed
validated
self-report
questionnaires
assessing
health.
Stress
reactivity
profiles
were
from
seven
repeated
assessments
during
pandemic
(January
2020
to
March/April
2021)
categorized
into
resilient
(more
plasticity)
vulnerable
(less
stress
recovery
profiles.
After
both
only
individuals
showed
significant
improvements
depression
symptomatology,
trait
anxiety,
emotion
regulation,
recovery.
Those
did
not
show
any
outcome.
Limitations
this
study
include
relatively
small
size
potential
biases
associated
participant
dropout.
Brief
may
be
more
beneficial
those
greater
levels
resiliency
plasticity
response
stressors.
More
might
require
intense
formats.
Язык: Английский
Reducing neuroendocrine psychosocial stress response through socio-emotional dyadic but not mindfulness online training
Frontiers in Endocrinology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
15
Опубликована: Июнь 24, 2024
Introduction
Stress-related
diseases
pose
significant
health
risks
and
show
wide
prevalence.
Empirical
evidence
suggests
that
contemplative
practices,
such
as
socio-emotional
dyadic
mental
exercises,
hold
promise
in
mitigating
the
adverse
effects
of
stress
promoting
psychosocial
well-being.
This
study
aimed
to
investigate
differential
two
online
training
programs
on
response:
first
involved
classic
mindfulness
while
second
incorporated
a
approach
known
Affect
Dyad.
Methods
The
was
conducted
part
longitudinal
CovSocial
project’s
phase
2
context
COVID-19
pandemic.
140
individuals
participated
Trier
Social
Stress
Task
(TSST),
where
response
assessed
with
cortisol
saliva
samples
subjective
questionnaires
cross-sectional
design
after
active
groups
finished
their
intervention
period.
Participants
were
randomly
assigned
group,
mindfulness-based
or
control
group
did
not
receive
any
training.
Both
consisted
ten-week
period
daily
12-minute
app-based
practice
weekly
2-hour
coaching
sessions
led
by
teachers.
Results
showed
Dyad
but
exhibited
significantly
lower
levels
at
10,
20,
30,
40
minutes
stressor
well
total
output
compared
during
TSST,
indicating
reduced
hormonal
social
stressor.
Subjective
markers
differences
between
three
groups.
Discussion
These
findings
indicate
practice,
which
emphasizes
non-judgmental
empathic
listening
acceptance
challenging
emotions
presence
others
within
one's
life
context,
may
serve
protective
factor
against
triggered
fear
negative
judgments.
Given
high
prevalence
stress-related
diseases,
based
practices
thus
represent
an
efficient
scalable
for
reduction.
Язык: Английский
10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(11), С. 3295 - 3295
Опубликована: Июнь 3, 2024
Background:
App-based
contemplative
interventions,
such
as
mindfulness-based
have
gained
popularity
for
the
promotion
of
mental
health;
however,
understanding
underlying
intervention-specific
mechanisms
remains
limited,
especially
related
to
novel
inter-relational
dyadic
practices.
Methods:
We
tested
(n
=
253)
seven
putative
two
brief
(daily
12-min)
online
interventions:
attention-focused
mindfulness
and
socio-emotional
partner-based,
both
supported
by
weekly
coaching.
Weekly
self-reports
rumination,
worry,
psychological
flexibility,
affective
control,
social
support,
acceptance,
were
obtained
over
10
weeks
intervention,
depression,
anxiety,
resilience
assessed
pre-
post-intervention
outcomes.
Results:
Significant
week-to-week
reductions
in
rumination
increases
flexibility
observed
interventions.
Only
attention-based
practice
led
temporal
only
control.
Mediation
analyses
with
slopes
variables
mediators
detected
no
significant
indirect
effects.
However,
exploratory
moderation
revealed
that
intervention-related
depressive
symptomatology
anxiety
vulnerability
predicted
acceptance
control
group,
worry
group.
Limitations
study
include
reliance
on
self-report
measures,
relatively
small
sample
size,
absence
long-term
follow-up
assessments
indicating
need
future
well-powered
longitudinal
studies
comparing
intervention
modalities.
Conclusions:
present
preliminary
evidence
practice-specific
active
ingredients
which
can
be
leveraged
enhance
their
efficiency
health.
Язык: Английский
Genetic predisposition for negative affect predicts mental health burden during the COVID-19 pandemic
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 8, 2024
Abstract
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
was
accompanied
by
an
increase
in
mental
health
challenges
including
depression,
stress,
loneliness,
and
anxiety.
Common
genetic
variants
can
contribute
to
the
risk
for
psychiatric
disorders
may
present
a
factor
times
of
crises.
However,
it
is
unclear
what
extent
polygenic
played
role
response
COVID-19
pandemic.
In
this
study,
we
investigate
whether
scores
(PGSs)
health-related
traits
distinguish
between
four
resilience-vulnerability
trajectories
identified
during
associated
lockdowns
2020/21.
We
used
multinomial
regression
genotyped
subsample
(
n
=
1316)
CovSocial
project.
most
resilient
trajectory
characterized
lowest
burden
highest
recovery
rates
served
as
reference
group.
Compared
trajectory,
higher
value
on
PGS
well-being
spectrum
decreased
odds
individuals
be
one
more
vulnerable
(adjusted
R
-square
0.3%).
Conversely,
neuroticism
increased
0.2%).
Latent
change
extracted
from
not
with
any
PGS.
Although
our
findings
support
influence
COVID-19,
small
added
explained
variance
suggests
limited
utility
such
markers
identification
general
population.
Язык: Английский